A departure from my usual posts. Had to break away from Iraq for awhile. A good, logical piece, I think.
Lando
To: Lando Lincoln
Nice post! I just call it the "D"word it's become so overused.
2 posted on
03/24/2003 7:19:28 PM PST by
Mears
To: Lando Lincoln
Exactly what is "Diversity" and who authorized it as a legitimate priority in education, above reading, writing, and mathmatics? It sounds like recognition of biological collectives over the real diversity that respectfully occurs when people are individually free. Maybe the diversity programs should be referred to as biological collective presumptions and grudges that persist and are harbored by vote-gatherers for a very long time, while they think of other ideas that might actually qualify as ideas?
3 posted on
03/24/2003 7:20:16 PM PST by
kcar
To: Lando Lincoln
One could only wish!
President Bush did mention the "soft rascism" (or something like that) of low expectations. It seems to me that is relevent here.
To automatically grant someone special priviledges because of their race or sex is to scream that they are incompetant to achieve on their own.
4 posted on
03/24/2003 7:21:04 PM PST by
MIgramma
(FEAR= False Evidence Alleged Real)
To: Lando Lincoln; Travis McGee
What school of ideas or specific thoughts can be attributed to just one race? If someone could prove that one race is the only race that can solve x, and that another race is the only race that can solve y, then there may be a case for diversity. However, since problem solvers come from all races, no one can say that diversity of thought and ideas is needed to spread ideas across races.
5 posted on
03/24/2003 7:26:32 PM PST by
hollywood
(THIS JUST IN! It turns out that I'm pro-choice. I choose revolvers.)
To: Lando Lincoln
Thanks for posting this.
To: Lando Lincoln
Yes, good piece. Diversity Bookmark
9 posted on
03/24/2003 7:44:54 PM PST by
Texas_Jarhead
(write, fax, email, or call someone in govt and ask them to please stop the southern invasion)
To: Lando Lincoln
A good piece and he is right on. Racism is the belief that culture is inate. Diversity says that just because someone decends from a different ethnic group; he has a different culture. Enforced racism on campus makes college worse for minorities not better.
11 posted on
03/24/2003 7:45:44 PM PST by
Varda
To: Lando Lincoln
Bookmarking
12 posted on
03/24/2003 7:47:42 PM PST by
hispanarepublicana
(successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
To: Lando Lincoln
The supreme court should define diversity as religion, and thusly claim its disseminaion in the public sphere unconstitutional.
13 posted on
03/24/2003 7:49:48 PM PST by
Cosmo
(Freedom before equality)
To: Lando Lincoln
Its time to dump the race criteria. Diversity is the movement designed keep the country Balkinized and erase the country of it Eurropean & Judeo-Christian root. (As if we didn't already know that here at FR)
14 posted on
03/24/2003 7:50:52 PM PST by
oyez
(This country is too good for some people.....)
To: Lando Lincoln
The authors of the Michigan enrollment policy are no different from the Muslim who killed his fellow soldiers with a hand grenade.
15 posted on
03/24/2003 7:51:37 PM PST by
Wavyhill
To: Vince Colyer
BTTT
17 posted on
03/24/2003 8:26:27 PM PST by
hollywood
(THIS JUST IN! It turns out that I'm pro-choice. I choose revolvers.)
To: hollywood
BTTT.
18 posted on
03/24/2003 8:40:21 PM PST by
hollywood
(THIS JUST IN! It turns out that I'm pro-choice. I choose revolvers.)
To: Lando Lincoln
"diversity" provides benefits compelling enough to justify using race as a criterion"---Compare with-
"All men are created equal"---or-
"...not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character, I have a dream..."---or-
"...shall not discriminate based upon race, color, creed, etc..."
It seems pretty simple doesn't it?
27 posted on
03/24/2003 9:16:10 PM PST by
Darheel
(Visit the strange and wonderful.)
To: Lando Lincoln
Amen.
Except for, say, the "liberal" arts schools or the philosophy program at the UofM, diversity is a meaningless proposition.
-Does the speed of light or speed of sound in a vacuum vary according to your skin color?
-Are the basic building blocks of the DNA molecule any different in minority communities than they are in majority communities?
-Do the principles of differential calculus depend on how wealthy or poor your parents are?
-Are the economic laws of supply and demand any different in the 'hood than they are in white-bread suburbia?
-Does "Brown vs. the Board of Education" mean anything less to whites than it does to blacks?
-Do Grignard reagents work differently in Jesse Jackson's world than they do in the real world?
-Does Oboe fingering for an F differ in Detroit and Bloomfield Hills?
-What is the airspeed of an unladen Swallow?
I could continue, but...
We're talking fundamental laws, principles, rules, methods of derivation, and the basic thought process at most of the schools at the UofM. These ideas don't depend on your race, creed, sex, religion, or wealth. A diverse classroom doesn't change the underlying lesson AT ALL.
To: Lando Lincoln
Well stated, thanks!
33 posted on
03/24/2003 10:04:09 PM PST by
Tamzee
("Sabotage" and "Charade"....no French translation necessary.)
To: Lando Lincoln
read later
To: Lando Lincoln
*Bump*
38 posted on
03/25/2003 9:52:23 AM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
To: The_Macallan
BFYI.
40 posted on
03/30/2003 4:28:54 PM PST by
hollywood
(THIS JUST IN! It turns out that I'm pro-choice. I choose revolvers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson