Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is she wearing? (Victoria Clarke attacked for her wardrobe)
The Guardian (U.K.) ^ | 04/02/03 | Gary Younge

Posted on 04/01/2003 8:21:29 PM PST by Pokey78

Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clarke has attracted more comment on her dress sense than her style of delivery. There could be a good reason for that, says Gary Younge

The US defence department's press office has been receiving complaints following its daily briefings. Given the abrasive style and evasive nature of defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld's delivery and the splits emerging between the politicians and the military, you would think it was about time.

But the complaints are not from peace protesters demanding more information on innocent civilians, or retired generals worried about supply lines, but men who believe that pink is an inappropriate colour to be worn from the Pentagon podium at a time of war.

The focus of their concern is the assistant secretary of defence for public affairs, Victoria Clarke. Or, more specifically, her wardrobe. The fact that at times such as these, not least in an era where women comprise 16 per cent of the US armed forces, men might still find time to fret about the shade of Clarke's plaid jackets rather than the tone and content of her delivery is worrying.

None the less, when you see the first woman to hold the job standing six feet tall in fire-engine red and pastel plaids in a room full of medalled-military blazers it is difficult not to notice. Even the Washington Post, not renowned for its frippery or flippancy, has been pushed to comment that Clarke's dress sense can at times detract from or even confuse the message. "The reality is that personal decisions and professional duties collide each time Clarke stands before the cameras to discuss developments in Iraq," wrote Robin Givhan in the Post on Friday. "It is understandable that some feel uneasy seeing condolences delivered by someone dressed in a pink plaid jacket suitable for Easter Sunday services."

The fact that Clarke, 43, is colour blind is a mitigating factor. "She couldn't tell you the exact colour of what she was wearing," says one senior defence official. But given the advisers to hand in such an image-conscious presidency, it offers only a partial explanation.

"Colour blindness could certainly explain Clarke's affection for jarring colour combinations," writes Givhan. "Or the tendency for her wardrobe to look like a collection of prepackaged separates rather than suits assembled based on mood or whims ... But it does not explain Clarke's decision to wear colour at all."

Either way, as the war goes from aerial bombing to street to street-fighting and the Pentagon takes centre stage, Americans will have to get accustomed to her idiosyncratic style. While she may never get the casting vote on the style council, Torie Clarke is going to become ever more familiar to viewers.

For a Republican party fighting a war far less popular with women than men, Clarke's on-screen presence has a particular currency. You will find her on the party's website, marketed as one of "thousands of women across the country who are providing the local leadership needed to deliver President Bush's compassionate conservative message." Yet while her delivery at the podium is a relief after Rumsfeld's scowl, her manner, let alone her message, is none the less abrupt.

She says she has abandoned the "smart blankety-blank" style that characterised her role as a PR woman in the corporate world when dealing with the press at the Pentagon. Her role, is "just too important". In most jobs "you think, well it isn't a matter of life or death. Here it is life or death matters," she told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. The Pentagon press corps regard her as a loyal supplier of the government's line of the day. Always on message, even when she is off-screen.

Raised as the youngest of five daughters in a middle-class family in Pennsylvania, her name alone presaged a fearsome if not fighting character. The way her father tells it she was named after Queen Victoria. According to her mother, "her heart valve didn't work so they baptised her right away, and when she made it through, they named her Victoria because she was victorious over death."

A lifelong Republican, she was press secretary for the Bush-Quayle presidential campaign in 1992. When Bush lost she moved into the private sector where she remained until she got a call from Bush junior's administration two years ago.

Referring to herself as the president of the Friends Don't Let Friends Go Back into Government Committee, she was a reluctant recruit. She had been in her present job just six months when American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into her workplace on September 11 2001. Later that day, she told the world the Pentagon was still open for business. Since then, with America declaring an endless war, Clarke has acquired an almost permanent presence.

And if her outfits raise eyebrows then it is a response with which she is familiar. As a child, her mother said: "She used to insist on walking around the house in a cowboy hat and leather pants. I think she actually had a holster and a gun." An instinct of which her current employers would no doubt approve.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraqifreedom; pentagon; theguild; victoriaclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
I guess Gary prefers crusty black pantsuits.
1 posted on 04/01/2003 8:21:29 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
She is smart as a whip, but, indeed, fashion-challenged.
2 posted on 04/01/2003 8:22:33 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I like her. I could care less what she wears. And, yes, its refreshing to see something besides Old Crusty.
3 posted on 04/01/2003 8:24:55 PM PST by CheneyChick (Lock & Load)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
How petty can these people get--now they're complaining about the dress code--the hatred is breathtaking
4 posted on 04/01/2003 8:26:27 PM PST by KansasCanadian (Living the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
Isn't she the Freeper known as Torie?
5 posted on 04/01/2003 8:26:56 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Looks OK to me.

6 posted on 04/01/2003 8:27:10 PM PST by martin_fierro (Mr. Avuncular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I have a feeling and hope that she is dressing like that for psychological reasons. Some sort of making her statements seem less scary our arab friends because she doesn't look like she can be taken seriously.
7 posted on 04/01/2003 8:27:44 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
Will old crusty ever be retired? I guess it will be patched and passed onto little Webster Hubblette (Chelsea).
8 posted on 04/01/2003 8:28:13 PM PST by GeishaGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KansasCanadian
Robin Given is the same bitch who blasted Katherine Harris about her make-up. Consider the source.
9 posted on 04/01/2003 8:28:30 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
C'mon now. You would think someone would assist her in selecting something less outrageous to wear.

What if Donald Rumsefeld showed up wearing something like that? Might as well be in a clown costume.
10 posted on 04/01/2003 8:28:49 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
In that particular position, I would have to say, as much as I hate to, that her attire should reflect professionalism. When she is not on the tube, she could express herself clotheswise, but not when acting as a Pentagon spokesperson.
11 posted on 04/01/2003 8:29:00 PM PST by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noslrac
You know she is. I like it.
12 posted on 04/01/2003 8:29:31 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
You must not have seen that pink and brown thing she was wearing about a week ago. I think there must have been 1,000 posts about it on the live thread.

If someone can find it, I think hole_n_one did a capture.
13 posted on 04/01/2003 8:29:50 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
One day she had this multi colored weird looking thing on...thats the first think I saw and thought to myself "what is she thinking." Then I began to wonder what purpose there would be behind it. Maybe she just has different ideas about dress and she can have that, it just seemed unprofessional at the time when she was mentioning POW's and such.
14 posted on 04/01/2003 8:30:05 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maro
RE #5

Yes.

15 posted on 04/01/2003 8:30:47 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

16 posted on 04/01/2003 8:32:13 PM PST by CheneyChick (Lock & Load)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Somehow I don't think these complaints originated from men. This catty nonsense has a woman's mark all over it.
17 posted on 04/01/2003 8:32:20 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Man, I can't see those earrings and dress together. But wait, I can and they clash!
18 posted on 04/01/2003 8:32:30 PM PST by steve86 (O.J. did it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
what is this, Katherine Harris redux
19 posted on 04/01/2003 8:32:34 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July 4th; Noslrac

This?

20 posted on 04/01/2003 8:32:50 PM PST by martin_fierro (Mr. Avuncular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson