Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA - RECKLESS LAWSUIT PREEMPTION SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY VOTE! (Gun lawsuit ban)
email | 4-8-03 | NRA Staff

Posted on 04/07/2003 9:51:43 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan

SPECIAL CONGRESSIONAL ALERT!

RECKLESS LAWSUIT PREEMPTION SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY VOTE!

H.R. 1036, the NRA-backed reckless lawsuit preemption legislation, has been scheduled for a vote this Wednesday, April 9 by the full U.S. House of Representatives. This critical reform seeks to put an end to the efforts of anti-gun extremists to drive law-abiding gun manufacturers into bankruptcy with their tactic of filing endless predatory lawsuits that have no merit. H.R 1036 currently has 251 cosponsors, more than a majority of U.S. Representatives, so the chance of it passing is strong. However, we can expect anti-gun lawmakers to do everything possible to derail this legislation, including offering amendments that would attempt to weaken or gut this measure.

Please be sure to call your U.S. Representative TODAY and urge him to support H.R. 1036 in its current form, and to oppose any amendments that would weaken or gut this critical legislative reform. If you need contact information for your U.S. Representative, please use our "Write Your Representatives" tool.

Remember to contact your U.S. Representative TODAY!


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; nra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
H. R. 1036

To prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 27, 2003
Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. JOHN, Ms. HART, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. FORBES, Mr. GOODE, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. HILL, Mr. MICA, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. TURNER of Ohio, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. HALL, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. PITTS, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. AKIN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. NEY, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CANNON, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. ROSS, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. CRANE, Mr. HERGER, Mr. PENCE, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. BOYD, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. KELLER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. TERRY, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. WICKER, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. BUYER, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. MATHESON, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. BACA, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. ISSA, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. WELLER, Mr. RENZI, Mr. UPTON, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. COBLE, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. BASS, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BURR, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CANTOR, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BERRY, Mr. JANKLOW, Mr. TIBERI, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. POMBO, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. CARTER, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. NUNES, Mr. COX, Mr. OTTER, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. DELAY, Mr. KLINE, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. LINDER, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. HAYES, Mr. GORDON, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. FLETCHER, Mr. COLE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. WAMP, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. NUSSLE, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. BONNER, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. REYES, Mr. WOLF, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. GOSS, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HYDE, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. SANDLIN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. REGULA, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BAKER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. TANNER, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. SESSIONS, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. DREIER, Mr. FEENEY, Mrs. BONO, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. CAMP, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. TURNER of Texas, Mr. OSE, Mr. OSBORNE, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. MOLLOHAN, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. CHABOT, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. BURNS, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. PORTER, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. TIAHRT, and Mr. RYUN of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL
To prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSES.

(a) FINDINGS- The Congress finds the following:

(1) Citizens have a right, protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, to keep and bear arms.

(2) Lawsuits have been commenced against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms that operate as designed and intended, which seek money damages and other relief for the harm caused by the misuse of firearms by third parties, including criminals.

(3) The manufacture, importation, possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States are heavily regulated by Federal, State, and local laws. Such Federal laws include the Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act, and the Arms Export Control Act.

(4) Businesses in the United States that are engaged in interstate and foreign commerce through the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, importation, or sale to the public of firearms or ammunition that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce are not, and should not, be liable for the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse firearm products or ammunition products that function as designed and intended.

(5) The possibility of imposing liability on an entire industry for harm that is solely caused by others is an abuse of the legal system, erodes public confidence in our Nation's laws, threatens the diminution of a basic constitutional right and civil liberty, invites the disassembly and destabilization of other industries and economic sectors lawfully competing in the free enterprise system of the United States, and constitutes an unreasonable burden on interstate and foreign commerce of the United States.

(6) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, and private interest groups are based on theories without foundation in hundreds of years of the common law and jurisprudence of the United States and do not represent a bona fide expansion of the common law. The possible sustaining of these actions by a maverick judicial officer or petit jury would expand civil liability in a manner never contemplated by the Framers of the Constitution, by the Congress, or by the legislatures of the several states. Such an expansion of liability would constitute a deprivation of the rights, privileges, and immunities guaranteed to a citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

(b) PURPOSES- The purposes of this Act are as follows:

(1) To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products for the harm caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended.

(2) To preserve a citizen's access to a supply of firearms and ammunition for all lawful purposes, including hunting, self-defense, collecting, and competitive or recreational shooting.

(3) To guarantee a citizen's rights, privileges, and immunities, as applied to the States, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to section 5 of that Amendment.

(4) To prevent the use of such lawsuits to impose unreasonable burdens on interstate and foreign commerce.

(5) To protect the right, under the First Amendment to the Constitution, of manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and trade associations, to speak freely, to assemble peaceably, and to petition the Government for a redress of their grievances.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON BRINGING OF QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY ACTIONS IN FEDERAL OR STATE COURT.

(a) IN GENERAL- A qualified civil liability action may not be brought in any Federal or State court.

(b) DISMISSAL OF PENDING ACTIONS- A qualified civil liability action that is pending on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be dismissed immediately by the court in which the action was brought.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS- The term `engaged in the business' has the meaning given that term in section 921(a)(21) of title 18, United States Code, and, as applied to a seller of ammunition, means a person who devotes, time, attention, and labor to the sale of ammunition as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the sale or distribution of ammunition.

(2) MANUFACTURER- The term `manufacturer' means, with respect to a qualified product, a person who is engaged in the business of manufacturing the product in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a manufacturer under chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code.

(3) PERSON- The term `person' means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity, including any governmental entity.

(4) QUALIFIED PRODUCT- The term `qualified product' means a firearm (as defined in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 921(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, including any antique firearm (as defined in section 921(a)(16) of such title)), or ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17) of such title), or a component part of a firearm or ammunition, that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

(5) QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY ACTION-

(A) IN GENERAL- The term `qualified civil liability action' means a civil action brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of a qualified product by the person or a third party, but shall not include--

(i) an action brought against a transferor convicted under section 924(h) of title 18, United States Code, or a comparable or identical State felony law, by a party directly harmed by the conduct of which the transferee is so convicted;

(ii) an action brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se;

(iii) an action in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly and willfully violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought;

(iv) an action for breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the product; or

(v) an action for physical injuries or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product, when used as intended.

(B) NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT- In subparagraph (A)(ii), the term `negligent entrustment' means the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows or should know the person to whom the product is supplied is likely to use the product, and in fact does use the product, in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to the person and others.

(6) SELLER- The term `seller' means, with respect to a qualified product--

(A) an importer (as defined in section 921(a)(9) of title 18, United States Code) who is engaged in the business as such an importer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such an importer under chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code;

(B) a dealer (as defined in section 921(a)(11) of title 18, United States Code) who is engaged in the business as such a dealer in interstate or foreign commerce and who is licensed to engage in business as such a dealer under chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code; or

(C) a person engaged in the business of selling ammunition (as defined in section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code) in interstate or foreign commerce at the wholesale or retail level, consistent with Federal, State, and local law.

(7) STATE- The term `State' includes each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States, and any political subdivision of any such place.

(8) TRADE ASSOCIATION- The term `trade association' means any association or business organization (whether or not incorporated under Federal or State law) that is not operated for profit, and 2 or more members of which are manufacturers or sellers of a qualified product.

1 posted on 04/07/2003 9:51:45 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Bump
2 posted on 04/07/2003 9:53:49 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bang_list
BTTT
3 posted on 04/07/2003 9:56:16 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Mr. WILSON of South Carolina,

My representative. Thanks for the post, Dan!

4 posted on 04/07/2003 9:57:22 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
Not this s**t again.
5 posted on 04/07/2003 9:58:02 PM PDT by ProudAmerican2003 (Courtesy of The Red White and Blue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]



Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


6 posted on 04/07/2003 9:58:48 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
bump
7 posted on 04/07/2003 10:00:35 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmerican2003
ProudAmerican2003 signed up 2003-04-08.
8 posted on 04/07/2003 10:11:05 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmerican2003
Not this s**t again.

If sh*t stands for Liberal trial lawyer litigation bullsh*t, I am in complete agreement.

Welcome to FR.

9 posted on 04/07/2003 10:14:36 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
I hate to walk on a thread, but has anyone heard anything about the NRA fighting to help the 'assault weapon' ban sun set? They keep calling for money yet do not seem to be doing anything besides putting out magazines.
10 posted on 04/07/2003 10:14:43 PM PDT by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmerican2003
What's wrong with this bill? It's actually a pro-gun bill.
11 posted on 04/07/2003 10:14:51 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I favor the objective of this bill. The anti-gun strategy is to bankrupt firearms manufacturers with endless litigation. It is time to put an end to that strategy. This may also help in California where the legislature exposed manufacturers and retailers to civil liability for criminal use of products they sold or manufactured...actions completely beyond their control.
12 posted on 04/07/2003 10:35:58 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
It's actually a pro-gun bill.

Yup. And it sounds like it stands a good chance of passing. But it would also seem that some on the left would prefer that it didn't or that it was weakened some before passing. Hence the call to urge your representative to pass it unimpeded.
13 posted on 04/07/2003 10:40:46 PM PDT by so_real (It's all about sharing the Weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Not that the uneducated Leftist press will figure this out, but it is a major sign of a paradidgm shift when you have more than half of all Congressmen *sponsoring* pro-gun legislation.

The Trial Lawyers, race pimps, and closet Reds must be shivering in their dirty, open-toed sandals at this and other pro-gun developments (e.g. arming pilots, progressive CCW, etc.).

But I will give the media this much credit, at least we no longer hear endless cries of how anyone who votes for pro-gun legislation has cost herself any chance of re-election. Even our biased press knows that much isn't true-enough to fool the public any longer.

14 posted on 04/08/2003 12:17:47 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmerican2003
"Not this s**t again."

Meaning what?
15 posted on 04/08/2003 1:17:10 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Bang list!
16 posted on 04/08/2003 1:54:22 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
(a)(1) Citizens have a right, protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, to keep and bear arms.

(3) The manufacture, importation, possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States are heavily regulated by Federal, State, and local laws. Such Federal laws include the Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act, and the Arms Export Control Act.

#######

Typical NRA doublespeak. Citizens have a RKBA, but they don't. The law says #1, why mention illegal legislation (#3) unless you're repealing it?

17 posted on 04/08/2003 2:53:54 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmerican2003
Huh?
18 posted on 04/08/2003 7:23:48 AM PDT by wardaddy (G-d speed our fighters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: TERMINATTOR
So they sould pretend the laws do not exist even if their case for limiting liablity is stronger if they mention such laws?
20 posted on 04/08/2003 8:41:27 AM PDT by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson