Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Church asks Tom Daschle to stop calling himself a Catholic
Weekly Standard (via Matt Drudge) ^ | April 17, 2003 | SB00

Posted on 04/17/2003 9:36:31 AM PDT by SB00

TOM DASCHLE may no longer call himself a Catholic. The Senate minority leader and the highest ranking Democrat in Washington has been sent a letter by his home diocese of Sioux Falls, sources in South Dakota have told The Weekly Standard, directing him to remove from his congressional biography and campaign documents all references to his standing as a member of the Catholic Church.

This isn't exactly excommunication--which is unnecessary, in any case, since Daschle made himself ineligible for communion almost 20 years ago with his divorce and remarriage to a Washington lobbyist. The directive from Sioux Falls' Bishop Robert Carlson is rather something less than excommunication--and, at the same time, something more: a declaration that Tom Daschle's religious identification constitutes, in technical Catholic vocabulary, a grave public scandal. He was brought up as a Catholic, and he may still be in some sort of genuine mental and spiritual relation to the Church. Who besides his confessor could say? But Daschle's consistent political opposition to Catholic teachings on moral issues--abortion, in particular--has made him such a problem for ordinary churchgoers that the Church must deny him the use of the word "Catholic."

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; daschle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-455 next last
To: SoothingDave
An act of nullity does nothing to make children "illegitimate."

In terms of canon law, no. But that kind of hair-splitting makes no logical sense to anyone except a canon lawyer, as Sheila Kennedy explained in Shattered Faith. Her book, by the way, had the very good effect of derailing at least one Kennedy's political career. Unfortunately, it did not seem to make a dent in the scandal of annulment-on-demand in the American Catholic Church. That will not end until we have a new and improved set of bishops. Sounds as if the guy in South Dakota might be pointing the way.

201 posted on 04/17/2003 12:01:49 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: lorrainer
2004, I believe.
202 posted on 04/17/2003 12:01:53 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
All of them? Do I win the ceegar?
203 posted on 04/17/2003 12:02:02 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"Another matter is the "punishment" is selective. Thousands of Catholics who are public figures need to be instructed to cease calling themselves Catholic per this standard. That won't happen, because it would backfire."

I agree. The big problem is the Church has an enormous credibility problem right now. The Church can denounce Dashole all they want, nobody will care that much outside of practicing Catholics. The Church has more important things to denounce in my opinion. We may think it's important (people who post here frequently that are more religous than most of America), but the typical piece of crap democrat could care less about what the church says about Dashole. His anti-Bush, anti-war statements will have a much more damaging impact on his re-election efforts than some abortion flap with the Catholic Church. Just my $.02, but I could be wrong.
204 posted on 04/17/2003 12:02:33 PM PDT by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Glad you pinged me .......this is very big news indeed!

I had a discussion with one of my priests on election day about supporting pro-life Catholic candidates like JEB BUSH. This priest is an old (about 80) MA DemocRAT and told me he was voting for McBride.

I told him he'd better 'go to confession if he voted for pro-abortion McBride'! As you can imagine...he didn't take that remark too well. I'm quite sure he voted for McBride because a few week after he was gloating when pro-abortion Landrieu won the special election in LA.

This same priest had the gall to tell me that 'abortion isn't the only issue'!
205 posted on 04/17/2003 12:03:13 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04........Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I don't see how that means people can't call Catholicism a religion and must refer to it as a denomination, which was your "point" in the first place.

I never made any such point. People can call it anything they want. I just corrected them.

Some call America free as well, they can if they want, but it "don't make it so".

206 posted on 04/17/2003 12:03:23 PM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Perhaps not in the eyes of the law, but what else is the point of saying a marriage never existed -- particularly when the request is made against the will of one of the partners, and by a POS Kennedy who just wants to get laid by another woman?

I would say first let us separate the issues here. One is the meaning of an annullment.

The other is whether certain influential people obtain them unworthily, or if too many are granted in general unworthily.

OK?

Now, I don't think anybody denies that the American Church has been way too loose in granting annullments. And I'm not about to tell you that a certain Kennedy is without influence.

So yes there are abuses. No doubt about it.

Now let's return to the definition of an annullment. It is a declaration that a valid marriage had never occurred.

However, this is not to make children of such a purported marriage "illegitimate."

The Church in general frowns on that type of labelling to begin with. No child is "illegitimate" in the eyes of God. A rapist's child in his victim is not deserving of death because of his father's crime and a child of a void marriage is not to be stigmatized.

If you want to talk about "legitimacy" of a child it is based not upon a later determinatino of fact, but the circumstances as they were known at the time. At the time of the children's birth, as far as anyone could determine, they were the product of a marriage. So they are as "legitimate" as any other children.

SD

207 posted on 04/17/2003 12:06:34 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
It is highly unusual, IMHO, for a church to ask that a member not identify him/herself with that church....highly unsual.

Yeah, I've NEVER heard of it ! Thanks ! Great news !

208 posted on 04/17/2003 12:06:36 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
This same priest had the gall to tell me that 'abortion isn't the only issue'!

Hmmmm....What would Jesus say about that? (I already know the answer : )

209 posted on 04/17/2003 12:06:46 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Torie
What is not OK is demanding that Daschle retract the claim. That is beyond his pay grade.

Torie. If a politician were to peddle libelous falsehoods about Jews, would it be OK for the ADL to demand a retraction? Would this be "beyond their pay grade"?

Daschle's willful misrepresentation is an abuse of both freedom of speech and of religion; in demanding that he desist, Daschle's bishop is exercising his own constitutional rights.

210 posted on 04/17/2003 12:06:48 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Great news !

Methinks O'Reilly's right: Daschole's on the slippery slope down; he's washed up, finished. (tra la la la la) : )

211 posted on 04/17/2003 12:09:13 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
But that kind of hair-splitting makes no logical sense to anyone except a canon lawyer, as Sheila Kennedy explained in Shattered Faith.

I'm 34 years old and I have never in my life seen anyone scandalised by the fact of legitimacy. Where we are now in this country illegitimacy is practically the norm, and for some populations it is.

Only a Kennedy would be distraught over such a thing.

SD

212 posted on 04/17/2003 12:10:39 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Grit
"... he spoke of California Governor Gray Davis's claim to be a 'pro-choice Catholic.'"

There is no such thing as a pro-choice Catholic. Only pro-choice former Catholics.

213 posted on 04/17/2003 12:11:15 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SB00
There are too many politicians who have allowed their political ambitions to trump what is morally right, and that includes Catholics, Jews, Protestants, etc. It's apparent that most of them have forgotten that at some point they will have to answer to a higher authority.
214 posted on 04/17/2003 12:11:44 PM PDT by luvtheconstitution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #215 Removed by Moderator

To: SB00
First, the pedophile priests, then the RATS.
216 posted on 04/17/2003 12:12:59 PM PDT by doug from upland ("You are not fit to be commander in chief" -- the father of Sgt. Shughart who died in Somalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
The Catholic Church has been using the same Creed for over a thousand years

Hmmm. Are you sure you want to make that assertion? Tell me, if a child dies three days after birth, before it has a chance to be christened/baptized, does it go to heaven? Hell? Research that question in Catholic doctrine before you answer.

As a medievalist by trade, I can tell you in no uncertain terms that the Catholic church has "modified" quite a few elements of its creed over the past 2,000 years...

217 posted on 04/17/2003 12:13:16 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Soþlice! [Truly!] See, all those years of Anglo-Saxon and Old Icelandic paid off...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
He's talking about the Nicene Creed. It has not changed since the addition of the filioque in 383.

SD

218 posted on 04/17/2003 12:15:24 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo
FYI: He's a French-Catholic at that!

Funny. Daschle doesn't sound like a French name....unless maybe it's Alsatian.

219 posted on 04/17/2003 12:15:35 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (A Person With No Sense Of Humor Is Someone Who Confuses The Irreverent With The Irrelevant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Pardon me for venting. I do not know of any church that is immune from influence by the rich and powerful, but I hope it is at least embarrassing.
220 posted on 04/17/2003 12:17:52 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson