Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force, Central Command set war trophy policy
Air Force Link ^ | 04/21/03 | Master Sgt. Scott Elliott

Posted on 04/21/2003 1:56:49 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

04/21/03 - WASHINGTON -- Servicemembers deployed supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom may be tempted to bring home souvenirs of their war experience, but Air Force legal officials are urging them to think twice.

Depending on the item, bringing home a "war trophy" could lead to court-martial, said Lt. Col. Karen L. Manos, legal staff officer in the Air Force's operations law division at the Pentagon.

Air Force Joint Instruction 31-217, "Control and Registration of War Trophies and War Trophy Firearms," has been in effect since the Vietnam era, Manos said. The instruction specifies what a servicemember must do to legally bring home a war trophy, and lists items that are not allowed to be brought home.

"(The instruction) lets you bring home certain things, but it requires written permission from the theater commander," Manos said. "If you don't get permission, it would be like theft -- it would actually violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice and (the perpetrator) could be court-martialed."

Two airmen were prosecuted by court-martial for violating the instruction following Operation Desert Storm.

According to the instruction, servicemembers are not allowed to claim the following as trophies:

-- Property belonging to the United States or an allied nation.

-- Nameplates pulled from any type of equipment.

-- Live ammunition, flammables, explosives or any item containing explosives.

-- Weapons that are defined as firearms by the National Firearms Act.

-- Electronic equipment, such as radios or radar.

-- Government-owned or privately owned equipment of the enemy that is not designed for individual issue.

-- Government-owned or privately owned articles of a household nature that have intrinsic value, such as coin collections or jewelry.

-- Religious items.

-- Items that have military research, training or intelligence value.

-- Items obtained in violation of international law.

-- Weapons that emit gas.

"What you're left with, basically, are individual issue items," Manos said. "An Iraqi mess kit, or something like that, would be fine."

One potential gray area in the instruction is the collection of nonlethal items of vague military value, the colonel said.

"A lot of people are collecting things like pictures of Saddam Hussein and Iraqi flags," she said. "A potential argument would be that it's government-owned equipment not designed to be issued to an individual. It would probably be OK, but you'd still need permission to bring it home."

Besides the Air Force joint instruction, Central Command General Order 1A prohibits weapons, munitions and military articles and equipment from being brought home as souvenirs.

Customs laws and postal regulations also prohibit shipment of certain items through the mail. According to the Air Force's chief of postal policy, sending hazardous material through the mail could endanger innocent bystanders because the military often uses commercial airlines to carry its mail.

"Commercial airlines have a requirement to provide safe flights to their passengers," Bob Eichholz said. "We don't want the Federal Aviation Administration or commercial carriers to start putting restrictions on our mail."

Manos said that, besides safety concerns, the instruction and general orders are intended to help the American military keep the moral high ground.

"They were established for good order and discipline," she said. "We don't want to have U.S. servicemembers acting like those of some other nations, where they can be accused of pillaging and stealing everything in sight."

The key thing to remember, Manos said, is that there is a right way to collect and bring home souvenirs -- servicemembers simply have to follow the rules.

"The regulations recognize that servicemembers want to be able to bring something home to show they were part of a war and played an important part," she said. "The regulations are a way of controlling a natural human desire -- they're just making sure it doesn't get out of hand."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraqifreedom; souvenirs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I think the title is a bit misleading. It looks to me like the authorities are reiterating a current policy, not making a new one.
1 posted on 04/21/2003 1:56:49 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I'll bet a few of Saddam's gold plated guns will end up in some General's private collections.
2 posted on 04/21/2003 2:01:45 PM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
What about Saddam's femur?
3 posted on 04/21/2003 2:08:50 PM PDT by hilaryrhymeswithrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hilaryrhymeswithrich
What about Saddam's femur?

Well, it was designed for an individual's use...

4 posted on 04/21/2003 2:12:44 PM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Textide
It's obviously lacking in much military value!
5 posted on 04/21/2003 2:17:09 PM PDT by SpinnerWebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
How many hundreds of millions of dollars did they find in that one house?

I hate to say this, but somewhere down the line, some of those dollars are likely to go missing.
6 posted on 04/21/2003 2:21:25 PM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
Maybe, but I seem to recall a general geing court-marshalled after GW I due to his illegal transportation of war contraband. They don't tolerate pillage and plunder anymore.
7 posted on 04/21/2003 2:23:09 PM PDT by americafirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Weapons that emit gas.

Darn! I guess that leaves out Baghdad Bob.

8 posted on 04/21/2003 2:23:51 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Now to turn our attention to the reelection of a great President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Think again.

Once upon a time, guns warn't skeery to most folks.

Bringing weapons home was commonplace after the First and Second World Wars. Even Class IIIs (full auto).

There's a passage in Unintended Consequences that discusses this.

9 posted on 04/21/2003 2:23:58 PM PDT by George Smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
I was hoping one would wind up in Dubya's presidential library some day. It would be worth a trip from Los Angeles to Texas (probably Austin) to see that.
10 posted on 04/21/2003 2:24:57 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Now to turn our attention to the reelection of a great President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
I would like to think that some of that money stashed in Saddam's palace has been "liberated" by U.S. troops. That would be one way to afford the $96 cases of beer now for sale in the streets of Baghdad.

Personally, I do not see anything wrong with a member of the armed services claiming an Iraqi "firearm" as a souvenir. In most cases, I would presume that such firearms would be unused and in pristine condition. Well, about as pristine as something can be in Iraq.

11 posted on 04/21/2003 2:26:36 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
How many hundreds of millions of dollars did they find in that one house?

320 million dollars. It was contained in 80 metal boxes that each had 4 million dollars, all in used 100 dollar bills.

Who knows how much more is out there?

12 posted on 04/21/2003 2:59:05 PM PDT by Norman Arbuthnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Norman Arbuthnot
Hey, those are designed for individual issue!
13 posted on 04/21/2003 3:06:26 PM PDT by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Personally, I do not see anything wrong with a member of the armed services claiming an Iraqi "firearm" as a souvenir.

"Rewards are necessary in order to make the soldiers see the advantage of beating the enemy; thus, when you capture spoils from the enemy, they must be used as rewards, so that all your men may have a keen desire to fight, each on his own account." - Sun Tzu

14 posted on 04/21/2003 3:07:44 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
If taking of the following is one of the illegals, then why are the Clintons in jail?

Property belonging to the United States or an allied nation.
15 posted on 04/21/2003 3:10:09 PM PDT by UpToHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UpToHere
If taking of the following is one of the illegals, then why are the Clintons in jail?

Oh that it were so!

16 posted on 04/21/2003 3:18:05 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Textide
Darn....
17 posted on 04/21/2003 3:33:27 PM PDT by hilaryrhymeswithrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
"Rewards are necessary in order to make the soldiers see the advantage of beating the enemy; thus, when you capture spoils from the enemy, they must be used as rewards, so that all your men may have a keen desire to fight, each on his own account." - Sun Tzu

Good idea ! Let's let them rape the women and sell the chidren into slavery too !

(Of all the quotes from The Art of War - to pick the one least applicable to today's American Military ... scheeze..)

18 posted on 04/21/2003 5:03:29 PM PDT by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RS
Good idea ! Let's let them rape the women and sell the chidren into slavery too ! (Of all the quotes from The Art of War - to pick the one least applicable to today's American Military ... scheeze..)

I didn't say anything about raping women or selling children, neither does Sun Tzu so I have no idea what you're talking about. It's very "applicable", especially since the title of the thread is "Air Force, Central Command set war trophy policy".

We used to allow soldiers to keep guns and all kinds of booty. Now we're court martialing them, which is asinine and very inappropriate considering he risked his life to accomplish the mission.

In GW-I the Saudis wanted to reward us with money, but of course our stupid ass chain of command turned them down stating that it wouldn't look right and instead issued some guys Article 15s for having "contraband". Not good for moral or re-enlistment incentives.

Note: Generals get to keep whatever they want. "Do as I say, not as a leader does" syndrome. "Sheeze" my ass.

19 posted on 04/21/2003 6:13:12 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RS; AAABEST
I agree with Sun Tzu that rewards are a good idea -- only we now give ribbons and patches for overseas service and for combat service. I think these have more value to most troops than whatever they might take from the enemy.

No one should be too sure that General Officers get to avoid the policies. Remember Grenada and Admiral Metcalf? I can tell you that today's Generals and Admirals do. And they don't want their whole career to come to an abrupt and ignomious end like Adm. Metcalf, who tried to bring back an authorized trophy.
20 posted on 04/21/2003 6:59:10 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson