Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists find there is no quick cure for Sars
Times Online ^ | April 23, 2003 | James Doran in Toronto and Oliver Wright

Posted on 04/22/2003 4:57:23 PM PDT by 11th_VA

SCIENTISTS searching for a cure for severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) have suffered a setback after finding that the virus blamed for the potentially fatal disease was not present in most patients taken ill. The World Health Organisation announced last week that the corona virus — responsible for the common cold — was at the root of the epidemic of a virulent strain of pneumonia. But Dr Frank Plummer, scientific director of the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, refuted the claim yesterday after weeks of intensive research into the disease that has killed 14 people in Toronto.

“Only 40 per cent of the people with what we call Sars have the corona virus. We have found no other virus but the connection between Sars and corona is actually very weak,” he said.

A WHO spokesman said that it was aware of the Canadian findings and was investigating. Dick Thompson, for the WHO, said that in previous tests carried out for the organisation the corona virus had been present in 90 per cent of all cases. “For now, we stand by our view that the corona virus is the cause, but what we need to investigate is why we have this anomaly in Canada,” he said. “One possibility is that it has been present in all the cases but is simply not being picked up at the time of testing. All the cases in Canada came from one infected person. We need to see if the virus has mutated.”

On April 16, Dr Klaus Stohr, of the WHO, released the results of a series of experiments on monkeys infected with Sars. “We can now say with all confidence that the causative agent of Sars is the corona virus first detected in Hong Kong on March 21,” he said. But Dr Marc-André Beaulieu, senior medical adviser with Health Canada, said that all scientists and government departments working on Sars should now be “more prudent”.

The announcement by Canadian officials came as researchers in British Columbia claimed to be doing a trial of a test for Sars on patients with suspected or probable symptoms of the disease. The researchers said that they were making progress and hoped to have a test available to the public within weeks.

But Dr Beaulieu said: “In order to develop a good diagnostic test you have to have a clear definition of the cause. For us this means we now have to be more prudent. We are saying that we would prefer to have a much more clear understanding of what causes the disease.”

The revelations from Health Canada coincided with an emergency meeting between Canadian health officials and senior officials from the American Centres for Disease Control.

American officials have become increasingly worried about the spread of Sars over the US-Canadian border since the disease was diagnosed this week in a man in Pennsylvania. The man was known to have been in contact with a 500-strong church group from Toronto, from which two people have died and 27 others have been infected. The 471 remaining members of the group are in quarantine.

Travellers to Toronto are being asked to monitor their health while in the city and during the ten days after their return. Sars has killed more than 230 people and infected some 4,500 since it emerged in China in November.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cnml; coronavirus; sars; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: I'll be your Huckleberry; pram; riri
Here's an older link on SARS posted by Mother Abigail:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/876176/posts

Pram, By artifacts Mother Abigail meant that the viral pieces being found weren't the root cause but were impairing the researchers from seeing beyond. For instance in radiology, artifacts on x-rays can misguide the radiologist. You probably have some photos with small artifacts caused by specks of dust or lint on a camera lense.
21 posted on 04/23/2003 9:01:17 AM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...paging the pink panther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
No quick cure? Then find a slow cure....anything to cut down on all these SARS threads.
22 posted on 04/23/2003 9:03:25 AM PDT by Consort (Use only un-hyphenated words when posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church; per loin; CathyRyan; aristeides; EternalHope
Interestinq quote I read last night that I think may apply to SARS.It is in response William Beveridge who authored Influenza: The Last Great Plague

He was wrong ofcourse. (Beveridge), and yet he was partially correct: the flu is in fact the last classic type of plague...He goes on to say " A disease used to be defined either by it's symptoms or by the damage itcaused to anatomical structures. Neither defintion applies to AIDS (in his view the first modern plague), a disease without specific clinical symptoms, charachterized by invisible subcellular damage and caused by a germ that could not be detected even by the most up to date analysis"

Excerpted from Virus, Luc Montagnier

23 posted on 04/23/2003 9:34:44 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: riri; All
SARS tied to genetic engineering?.
24 posted on 04/23/2003 11:03:31 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
Thank you,

That thread seems so long ago. How fast this is all moving.
25 posted on 04/23/2003 2:20:12 PM PDT by I'll be your Huckleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church; riri
Did you notice that MA bookmarked that thread to herself? I don't remember seeing that.
26 posted on 04/23/2003 2:22:41 PM PDT by I'll be your Huckleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Consort
....anything to cut down on all these SARS threads.

I agree! We need more room for the long Scott Peterson threads. And Dixie Chickens too!

27 posted on 04/23/2003 2:26:56 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Right. Nobody overdoes it like us.
28 posted on 04/23/2003 2:47:07 PM PDT by Consort (Use only un-hyphenated words when posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: I'll be your Huckleberry
Yes, I noticed MA did that and I wondered why she mentioned it too(and then I bookmarked as well.) Much to read between the lines.
29 posted on 04/23/2003 3:48:56 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...paging the pink panther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson