Skip to comments.
Scientists find there is no quick cure for Sars
Times Online ^
| April 23, 2003
| James Doran in Toronto and Oliver Wright
Posted on 04/22/2003 4:57:23 PM PDT by 11th_VA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: I'll be your Huckleberry; pram; riri
Here's an older link on SARS posted by Mother Abigail:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/876176/posts
Pram, By artifacts Mother Abigail meant that the viral pieces being found weren't the root cause but were impairing the researchers from seeing beyond. For instance in radiology, artifacts on x-rays can misguide the radiologist. You probably have some photos with small artifacts caused by specks of dust or lint on a camera lense.
21
posted on
04/23/2003 9:01:17 AM PDT
by
Domestic Church
(AMDG...paging the pink panther)
To: 11th_VA
No quick cure? Then find a slow cure....anything to cut down on all these SARS threads.
22
posted on
04/23/2003 9:03:25 AM PDT
by
Consort
(Use only un-hyphenated words when posting.)
To: Domestic Church; per loin; CathyRyan; aristeides; EternalHope
Interestinq quote I read last night that I think may apply to SARS.It is in response William Beveridge who authored Influenza: The Last Great Plague
He was wrong ofcourse. (Beveridge), and yet he was partially correct: the flu is in fact the last classic type of plague...He goes on to say " A disease used to be defined either by it's symptoms or by the damage itcaused to anatomical structures. Neither defintion applies to AIDS (in his view the first modern plague), a disease without specific clinical symptoms, charachterized by invisible subcellular damage and caused by a germ that could not be detected even by the most up to date analysis"
Excerpted from Virus, Luc Montagnier
23
posted on
04/23/2003 9:34:44 AM PDT
by
riri
To: riri; All
To: Domestic Church
Thank you,
That thread seems so long ago. How fast this is all moving.
To: Domestic Church; riri
Did you notice that MA bookmarked that thread to herself? I don't remember seeing that.
To: Consort
....anything to cut down on all these SARS threads. I agree! We need more room for the long Scott Peterson threads. And Dixie Chickens too!
27
posted on
04/23/2003 2:26:56 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
To: Revolting cat!
Right. Nobody overdoes it like us.
28
posted on
04/23/2003 2:47:07 PM PDT
by
Consort
(Use only un-hyphenated words when posting.)
To: I'll be your Huckleberry
Yes, I noticed MA did that and I wondered why she mentioned it too(and then I bookmarked as well.) Much to read between the lines.
29
posted on
04/23/2003 3:48:56 PM PDT
by
Domestic Church
(AMDG...paging the pink panther)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson