Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Psst . . . Democrats Debating Tonight (And nobody even knows, much less cares! Bwa-ha!)
The New York Times ^ | May 3, 2003

Posted on 05/03/2003 12:24:49 PM PDT by Timesink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: sweetliberty
From the article:

-Span, the nation's venerable electronic forum, was eager for live coverage for the nonprofessional electorate out here, but it says it had to settle for playbacks beginning Sunday afternoon. Otherwise, 40 or so local ABC outlets and Internet broadcasters are opting to broadcast the debate when it is over, after 11 tonight, while others are not. (Blacked-out New Yorkers can only envy Pocatello and Traverse City tonight.)

So, I can't watch, at all, I guess (NYer's blacked out). I'll try to get more specific times for the "after 11" tonight.

21 posted on 05/03/2003 1:47:16 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Should be pure comedy. I am missing one. There are Dean, Kerry, Edwards, Sharpton, Moseley-Braun, Lieberman, Grahm and Gebhart. Who is the ninth candidate?
22 posted on 05/03/2003 1:51:03 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Best I could do, from here

: The debate, sponsored by ABC News, will not be televised live nationally. It will be taped for airing later on nearly 50 ABC affiliates around the country, with most showing it after the Saturday night news but some waiting until later in the night or Sunday morning.

23 posted on 05/03/2003 1:53:48 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
A THOUGHT: I think they don't want to air it live nationally because they're too afraid of having the speech impediments of which they accuse GW. They may say things as: misunderestimate or strategery, for example; why, they may even choke on a pretzel or while taking a sip of water. They may not know the Vice Premier of a certain foreign country. They may not know who is the individual leading in Iraq's interim government now that Saddam Hussein is gone. And Kerry might mistakenly say "we need a regime change in the US, too." All mistakes will be cut or dubbed over by press time!
24 posted on 05/03/2003 1:57:17 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Dennis Kucinich
25 posted on 05/03/2003 1:59:24 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty; Budge; nicmarlo; TheLion
As of now - and Lord knows that with C-SPAN, any of this could change at any moment - it's scheduled to air on C-SPAN tomorrow at 1:15 pm, 6:30pm and 9:30pm Eastern.
26 posted on 05/03/2003 2:00:14 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Never heard of him. What's his story?
27 posted on 05/03/2003 2:00:31 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
So the debates will be tucked away in some obscure place and time.

Dear me, I always thought the purpose of debates was to showcase the particular talents and views of the candidates to the voters, hence helping them to decide who to vote for.

The "secret" debate is more likely due to there being no talent, and no variation in views for the lot of them. They are simply "the opposition candidate(s)"

28 posted on 05/03/2003 2:01:12 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
What??? You mean it isn't going to be on ANYTHING live?
29 posted on 05/03/2003 2:02:36 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The Nine Horsemen of the Apocolypse?
30 posted on 05/03/2003 2:03:21 PM PDT by gitmo ("The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Never heard of him. What's his story?

Imagine a perpetually pissed-off Paul Wellstone, and you'll get the gist. Just plug his name into FR's search engine, and all sorts of amusing articles will come up about him and his opinions.

31 posted on 05/03/2003 2:03:31 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty

Kucinich
32 posted on 05/03/2003 2:04:22 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Just saw a brief clip on Fox. Looks like a born loser.
33 posted on 05/03/2003 2:05:04 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
What??? You mean it isn't going to be on ANYTHING live?

I think it will be on ABCNEWS' Internet video feed live, though i'm not 100% certain of that. And you have to pay for that feed. $5/mo just for ABC, or $10/mo through Real Networks, where you get ABC plus a zillion other things.

34 posted on 05/03/2003 2:05:26 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Thanks, Timesink!
35 posted on 05/03/2003 2:05:37 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one; sweetliberty
I was guessing McCain.
36 posted on 05/03/2003 2:07:11 PM PDT by gitmo ("The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
lol!
37 posted on 05/03/2003 2:07:40 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Cowards! Of course I would never pay to watch the RATs make complete asses of themselves. I guess i'll have to try and catch the later taped delay.
38 posted on 05/03/2003 2:07:51 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
LOL!
39 posted on 05/03/2003 2:08:38 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Considering I'm a Chicagoan who still considers Carol Motley Brawn a criminal, and hoped I'd never have to see her ugly face again, I could not ever watch it.
40 posted on 05/03/2003 2:08:51 PM PDT by JustPiper (Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson