Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein to introduce "Assault Weapon Ban" renewal today.
San Fransisco Gate ^ | 5/07/03 | MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 05/08/2003 11:14:27 AM PDT by BlessingInDisguise

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: AAABEST
Exactly! The lack of law abiding citizens ready and able to defend themselves creates a target rich environment.
21 posted on 05/08/2003 11:58:46 AM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
Hmmm... Ironic I bet Feinstien's body guards are packing. Yeah take the weapons away from us so that the real criminals will have the weapons leaving us with nothing to defend ourselves.
22 posted on 05/08/2003 12:01:11 PM PDT by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise

Are you guys going to vote for Bush even though he will sign this?

I will.
23 posted on 05/08/2003 12:02:47 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01
Ha, Feinstein used to pack heat herself back in Kali. Seriously!
24 posted on 05/08/2003 12:02:47 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
The difference is in the definition of an assault weapon. The current law and Feinstein's bill cast a narrower net than does the proposal by House Democrats.

This is perfect. Let them write a 'new' assault weapons ban. It will have an even slimmer chance of passing than the renewel of the existing law. Plus, Bush is not committed to signing a 'new' law.

25 posted on 05/08/2003 12:03:57 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I know it won't reach his desk anyways, but if by some miracle it did, and he signed it I GUARANTEE YOU he will be a one term President.

And I'm already seriously considering voting for someone else after the Patriot Act and the fact that he was against arming pilots, do you think I would vote for him after he signed an AWB extension or signed a bill to make it permanent???

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

26 posted on 05/08/2003 12:05:16 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
And now as a direct result of the "AWB" pocket and compact size handguns are becoming all the rage as you cannot buy new magazines that hold more than ten rounds anyways.

An unintended consequence of the ban. We now have much higher quality and more powerful pocket (CCW) guns available, and a nice variety of them as well.

27 posted on 05/08/2003 12:05:41 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: templar
You're right, some good came of the AWB :)
28 posted on 05/08/2003 12:07:05 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01
Hmmm... Ironic I bet Feinstien's body guards are packing.

Actually, DiFi has one of the few carry permits ever issued in SanFran.

29 posted on 05/08/2003 12:08:03 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
Ha, Feinstein used to pack heat herself back in Kali. Seriously!

Used to? You mean she quit? Maybe she can't get a license for D.C. and just has to make do with armed security guards?

30 posted on 05/08/2003 12:08:08 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
Go to your home page, and then click on "links."
31 posted on 05/08/2003 12:10:27 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
"And I'm already seriously considering voting for someone else after the Patriot Act and the fact that he was against arming pilots, do you think I would vote for him after he signed an AWB extension or signed a bill to make it permanent???

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"

My guess is that you didn't vote for Bush in 2000, either. So who cares?
32 posted on 05/08/2003 12:11:23 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Hmmm...gotta get me one of those TEC-9s

Got one. Got a KG-99 as well. Bought them mostly because they were being banned and I felt a need to own them for that reason. I've Fired both of them extensively. They both have proven to be highly reliable and I actually hit a target with one of them once.

33 posted on 05/08/2003 12:14:09 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I do. I don't want this country turning into the 4th reich or the union of american socialists, but when both choices suck bigtime, you have to vote for someone else. It's just that simple. I don't vote for candidates who support unconstitutional positions. I wish I could vote for Ron Paul....but I don't live in Texas.


34 posted on 05/08/2003 12:18:09 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: templar
"and I actually hit a target with one of them once."

Hehe

35 posted on 05/08/2003 12:18:56 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
"The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

It’s actually ...

"..., the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

But I heed your warning of grammatical challenges.
36 posted on 05/08/2003 12:21:56 PM PDT by Eric Esot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
Thanks Fraulein.

Can I ask the origin of your username?

37 posted on 05/08/2003 12:22:46 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley
Everything I own has been deemed illegal by certain unconstitutional (IMHO) statutes in California.

LOL! That is the best way to buy.

38 posted on 05/08/2003 12:22:49 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric Esot
Thanks for the correction!
39 posted on 05/08/2003 12:23:16 PM PDT by BlessingInDisguise (Vote Libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: All

40 posted on 05/08/2003 12:24:40 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson