Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Want to Fund Chinese Abortions
Seamax ^ | 5/11/2003 | Fr. Michael Reilly

Posted on 5/12/2003, 3:21:24 AM by Hugenot

Everyone knows that Red China is involved in forced abortions as a means of population control and perhaps some people know that American law precludes financial support for coerced abortion.

But how many people know that the Democrats just voted to weaken that law?

The Kemp-Kasten Human Rights Provision does not allow the United States to sponsor programs that involve “coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”

In an effort to make UN Population Fund (UNFPA) eligible for US funding, Rep. Joe Crowley (D, NY) sponsored an amendment that would make UNFPA responsible only if they directly coerced women to have abortions. Twenty-two Democrats and one Republican voted in favor of the UNFPA amendment.

Austin Ruse of the Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute reports that this amendment would permit the UNFPA to continue indirectly supporting coerced abortion in China and other countries, since the terms of the amendment define UNFPA involvement as indirect.

In July 2002 Secretary of State Colin Powell announced that “UNFPA’s support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion….In light of the Kemp-Kasten amendment, no funds…may be provided to UNFPA…”

According to Ruse, the latest US State Department report for China, released in March, notes that “From 1998 through 2002, the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) conducted a 4-year pilot project in 32 counties…. However, these counties retained the birth limitation policy, including the requirement that couples employ effective birth control methods, and enforced it through other means, such as social compensation fees.”

Perhaps the best part of the story is that Crowley seeks $100 million for UNFPA over the next two years. Isn't it amazing that we can't afford tax cuts, but we can afford $100 million for the United Nations to fund forced abortions in China? Is that a reward to the UN for all the support they gave us in the Iraqi war?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; china; democrats; forcedabortions; taxcuts; unitednations

1 posted on 5/12/2003, 3:21:25 AM by Hugenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
Sounds like the DemoRats.

I wonder who the guy is that calls himself a Republican?

2 posted on 5/12/2003, 3:38:36 AM by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
To some Democrats, an abortion a day keeps the doctor away.
3 posted on 5/12/2003, 3:41:07 AM by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
I wonder how democrats would feel if Republicans endorsed money for just democrats to have abortions?
4 posted on 5/12/2003, 4:13:58 AM by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
I guess that the millions of American children they're killing just doesn't satisfy their bloodlust anymore.
5 posted on 5/12/2003, 5:05:25 AM by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auggy
I wouldn't mind so much, if they supported abortions for people in the middle east, in fact, I would donate money to the cause.
6 posted on 5/12/2003, 9:48:22 PM by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
I am afraid SARS may take care of China's over-population worries.....
7 posted on 5/12/2003, 9:52:01 PM by myprecious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
I believe all DemocRATS should be aborted right now. Dasshole should go first.
8 posted on 5/13/2003, 6:38:40 AM by ImphClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
Democrats really hate babies, don't they?
9 posted on 5/13/2003, 4:12:12 PM by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugenot
Why?
10 posted on 5/13/2003, 6:04:25 PM by freekitty (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; bulldogs; ...
ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

11 posted on 5/14/2003, 6:08:01 PM by Mr. Silverback (Tried a vegetarian diet, but they were too darn stringy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
I wouldn't mind so much, if they supported abortions for people in the middle east, in fact, I would donate money to the cause.

I'm sorry to tell you this, but you are a major putz. We don't need that crap at FR. Try DU, they like spending government funds to kill brown people.

12 posted on 5/14/2003, 6:10:38 PM by Mr. Silverback (Tried a vegetarian diet, but they were too darn stringy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
DU would probably have a pro-life stance around the world, except in europe and america. Is it so wrong, to advocate "Reproduction rights" for people in the middle east?
13 posted on 5/14/2003, 6:17:00 PM by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Trust me, the reason the "pro-choice" crowd fights so hard for these initiatives is because they are inherently racist groups. Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood's founder, used to praise the Nazis back in the 30's and she even let the Nazi Minister of Racial Hygiene write a feature article.

Finally, does this sound familiar: "NO racism or violence in posts." To advocate genocide against the Arabs, whether by bombs or "Family Planning" is racist, plain and simple.

14 posted on 5/15/2003, 4:10:24 PM by Mr. Silverback (No clintons in office, ever again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson