Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Jayson Blair, and now Fox Butterfield. Will the NY Times falsehoods never end? (/sarcasm off).
1 posted on 05/13/2003 2:01:39 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Liz
Never write a slanderous report about a state supreme court justice. If this is true, and you never can tell with the NYT tabloid these days, the guy should be called 'Butter Brain'.
2 posted on 05/13/2003 2:23:25 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


3 posted on 05/13/2003 2:28:12 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
This is not the first time Fox Butterfield has been in trouble at The New York Times.
4 posted on 05/13/2003 2:30:53 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Rule #1: Don't piss off a guy who buys his ink by the barrel.

Addendum to Rule #1: NOBODY should piss off a judge.
7 posted on 05/13/2003 2:47:00 AM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
...newspaper attorney James Wooley said any errors were unintentional and without malice

Notice that the Times' lieyer didn't say that the piece wasn't without an agenda, something that Fox "I Hate Guns" Butterfield is absolutely famous for here on Free Republic.

8 posted on 05/13/2003 5:27:29 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
I hope that this sets a legal precedent. Hopefully, the NY Slimes will find itself up to its lying neck with lawsuits targeting lies and half truths to advance the left wing agenda!
9 posted on 05/13/2003 8:49:26 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
any errors were unintentional and without malice

Here we go with the "absence of malice BS"!

17 posted on 05/13/2003 9:03:50 AM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones (D-Ohio) was the prosecutor for the case, and she refused to allow it to go forward.

She was in the process of starting up her campaign for the House of Representatives, so this would have cramped her style. It was a huge national story, as the guy has been trying for decades to clear his father's name.

The new prosecutor, William Mason, finally sent it to trial, and Reese lost.

Wonder why Tubbs-Jones got cleared in this. She was obviously derelict in her duties. She, too, should have recused herself if she had no intention of following the rule of law.
20 posted on 05/13/2003 9:06:16 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
The lawyers smell blood and the New York Times has made a LOT of enemies over the years.
21 posted on 05/13/2003 9:07:19 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Butterfield no doubt will be bailed out this mess by his rich and famous mother. But it still will be a sticky situation.....
26 posted on 05/13/2003 9:26:30 AM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson