Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel formally approves the 'road map'
Jerusalem Post ^ | May. 25, 2003 | THE JERUSALEM POST INTERNET STAFF

Posted on 05/25/2003 6:43:08 AM PDT by yonif

The cabinet approved the US-backed 'road map' peace plan Sunday by a vote of 12 to seven with four ministers of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Likud Party abstaining.

The decision approved the plan that calls for Palestinians to achieve statehood by 2005, making it the first time Israel formally affirmed a Palestinian right to statehood.

But a number of conditions were attached to the plan, including an insistence that the Palestinians not demand a so-called 'right of return' by refugees to Israel, which passed by a separate vote of 16-1.

Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Education Minister Limor Livnat, Health Minister Dan Naveh and Internal Security Minister Tsahi Hanegbi abstained in the vote for the 'road map'. Among those who voted against were ministers from the National Religious Party and the National Union.

Justice Minister Yosef (Tommy) Lapid of the Shinui Party, whose five ministers all voted in favor, said he voted yes, because "we cannot continue to recruit reservists for duty in the territories unless they are confident the government is doing the utmost to make peace."

Zevulun Orlev of the NRP called the plan "a gamble on the country's future," since it offers no concrete guarantees of a cessation of terror attacks in exchange for the Palestinians achieving statehood.

The vote followed a five and a half hour long meeting held at the cabinet's routine meeting site at The Prime Minister's Office, just two days after Sharon embraced the "road map" to Mideast peace, after receiving assurances from the US that 14 Israeli concerns about the plan would be addressed.

The Palestinians accepted the plan last month, immediately after it was presented.

Left-wing Israelis gave mixed reactions to the vote. Lawmaker Ran Cohen of the Meretz Party said that unless the cabinet set a detailed timetable for implementing the plan, and the Palestinians set to work cracking down on terrorism, the 'road map' would become an "exercise in futility."

Sharon was quoted as telling ministers at the start of the meeting that Israel needs to back the plan, if only for the sake of helping to cure an economic recession that is worsened by the continuation of a 32-month uprising and terror wave.

"There is a clear link between our political and our economic situation," Sharon said, according to Israel Radio.

He reassured ministers he would not back away from any of the government's objections, according to Benny Rom, spokesman for Infrastructure Minister Yosef Paritzky.

Before the meeting, Sharon convened Likud ministers to muster their support behind the plan. Media reports said it was a stormy session, with hardliners sticking fast to their views.

Uzi Landau, a Likud minister said he would vote against the plan and called Washington's reassurances a "sugar coated cyanide pill."

Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told the radio before the vote was held that he was not happy with the peace plan, but planned to vote for it.

"I think the document is not a good one, but we have to choose when we battle the US, and now is not the time," Olmert said.

Meanwhile, Sharon was quoted by the Yediot Aharonot daily as saying Saturday that "the time has come to say yes to the Americans, the time has come to divide this land between us and the Palestinians." According to Yediot, Sharon reiterated his belief that a Palestinian state was inevitable.

"No one can teach me about these areas," Sharon said. "I am no less connected to these lands that we will have to leave when the time comes than those who speak in such lofty terms. But you have to be realistic." Sharon has said he envisions a Palestinian state in about half the West Bank with no Palestinian foothold in Jerusalem.

According to media reports, Sharon's bureau chief, Dov Weisglass opened the session with a review of agreements reached with the US regarding the "road map." Later Sharon reportedly spoke, giving his economic rationale for supporting the plan.

An Israeli official told The Jerusalem Post on Saturday that Israel had no interesting in creating a crisis with the US over the plan at this time.

"We are still at the gateway to the road map, and there are certain preliminary steps the Palestinians must take before we even start first stage, like taking steps to stop the violence and halt the incitement. Why create a crisis now?," the official said.

According to this logic, it is not wise to create a political crisis over the road map now, when it is still unclear whether Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) will take the steps to stop the violence which are needed for it to kick in.

Bringing the plan to the cabinet Sunday was made possible because of a statement by Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice that was distributed by the White House.

"The United States government received a response from the government of Israel explaining its significant concerns about the road map," the statement read.

"The United States shares the view of the government of Israel that these are real concerns, and will address them fully and seriously in the implementation of the road map." Sharon's office then issued its own carefully worded statement Friday, which read:

"In view of the recent statement of the US regarding the Israeli comments on the road map, which shares the view of the government of Israel that these are real concerns and in view of the US promise to address those concerns fully and seriously in the implementation of the road map to fulfill the president's vision [of June 24, 2002], we are prepared to accept the steps set out in the road map."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abomination; cabinet; desolation; israel; roadmap; yesha
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2003 6:43:08 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
But a number of conditions were attached to the plan, including an insistence that the Palestinians not demand a so-called 'right of return' by refugees to Israel, which passed by a separate vote of 16-1.

An "approval" with a critical pre-requisite such as this is not actually an approval. It is a "counter-offer".

I was hoping that when Bubba left, the USA would no longer spin stuff like this. Alas, some things remain exactly the same.

Also, Netanyahu has given his supporters another example of his lack of backbone. If he wanted people to see his as a man of principle, he should have voted NO instead of abstaining.

2 posted on 05/25/2003 7:46:25 AM PDT by Mr170IQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr170IQ; yonif
1 posted on 05/25/2003 6:43 AM PDT by yonif

now 8:05 AM . . . great jubilation here at FreeRepublic!!!

3 posted on 05/25/2003 8:06:27 AM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr170IQ
Bump, I can't believe no one is talking about the big news of the day.
4 posted on 05/25/2003 8:18:03 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yonif
*Yawn.* Just more proof that it is Israel who always wants peace, and makes and accepts overtures and concessions. But of course this, as all the other ME "peace plans" will go no place. Because the Arafat-Mazen regime is not interested in "peace", except maybe in the peace of the grave for Jews. As with Camp David, this an excercise in futility, a show for the world. Nothing will come it. Islamoterrorism will continue. Nevetheless the enemies of Israel will salivate at this news, for they think it brings them one step closer to Israel's destruction. WRONG again.
5 posted on 05/25/2003 8:32:22 AM PDT by veronica (How's about a Palestinian state inside France? It could be called "Francenstine"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr170IQ
Alas, some things remain exactly the same.

It is a shame that terrorists are being appeased. Terrorists should never be allowed to have power in any part of the world. With the moves of this administration, the PLO-terrorist regime is getting audience from our American government, a government I thought wanted to defeat terrorist regimes.

It is a dangerous move to Israel's security....and existence.

6 posted on 05/25/2003 8:33:10 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; RaceBannon; BlueOneGolf; Paved Paradise; Mr. Mojo; Thinkin' Gal; ...
PING
7 posted on 05/25/2003 8:33:40 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
And Bush is talking about having a summit in Egypt? When will we learn that this is not the answer, the answer is the destruction of terrorism (which the PA is a part of).
8 posted on 05/25/2003 8:34:45 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Big Mistake

Once again the lambs (Israel) are being led to the slaughter.

I hope Israel wakes up before it is too late.

This peace map will lead Israel down a path to destruction.

9 posted on 05/25/2003 8:39:10 AM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"*Yawn.* Just more proof that it is Israel (born of terrorism - Irgun Stern Haganah ) who always wants peace, and makes and accepts overtures . . . we shall see . . .
10 posted on 05/25/2003 8:43:51 AM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yonif
We are learning all the time, yet the more things change the more they stay the same. No sane person, or history buff, thinks this whole thing is anything but another show, a dance macabre that will eventually be lots of sound and fury signifying nothing. As long as terrorist factions proliferate in the ME, and homicide bombings continue, any talk of a "Palestinian" state is an absurdity that will never occur. Then again, if a "Palestinian" state would mean ALL Islamofascists could be kept out of Israel, and Israel would be free to answer *any* attack from such a "state" or it's satellite allies with full and *I mean full force*, it's something to consider. :)

11 posted on 05/25/2003 8:44:18 AM PDT by veronica (How's about a Palestinian state inside France? It could be called "Francenstine"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veronica
It will be harder to combat terrorism if they have a state. Once they are a state, they will join the Arab league, and sign all these different defense pacts with Arab countries. So if Israel were to go pursue the terrorists, they will have this to bear. Furthermore, after a state is established there will be a UN force which will be on the border, because the PLO will invite them. It will serve as a safety net for their terrorism, as Israel will not be able to pursue terrorists behind these UN guys. If Israel were to go there, there will be a huge outcry and countries in the UN will take steps to combat Israel's "agression."

A state will be dangerous. It will be similar to what Cuba did to the US in the 1960s.
12 posted on 05/25/2003 8:48:25 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Justice Minister Yosef (Tommy) Lapid of the Shinui Party, whose five ministers all voted in favor, said he voted yes, because "we cannot continue to recruit reservists for duty in the territories unless they are confident the government is doing the utmost to make peace."

. . .

Sharon was quoted as telling ministers at the start of the meeting that Israel needs to back the plan, if only for the sake of helping to cure an economic recession that is worsened by the continuation of a 32-month uprising and terror wave.

Interesting.

13 posted on 05/25/2003 8:48:45 AM PDT by Scenic Sounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Haber
The existence of Israel is the only way to guarantee the Jewish people have defense.

Israel was not founded on terrorism, as you said correctly.

The roadmap will hurt the ability of Israel to safeguard its citizens. Look at all the terrorism the PA is perpetrating. Think about what will happen when it has a state to run.
15 posted on 05/25/2003 9:08:59 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Haber
To suggest that Israel was born of terrorism is also to say that the United States was similarly created. Needless to say it's a complete untruth in both cases.

Go to any anti-semitic website, and you will note that one of their ongoing schticks is to claim Israel was born of terrorism. It's revisionist history, not unlike Holocaust denial, and like Holocaust denial, it's a lie. And of course by doing this, they are also trying to mitigate current Islamic/Palestinian terrorism.

16 posted on 05/25/2003 9:13:31 AM PDT by veronica (How's about a Palestinian state inside France? It could be called "Francenstine"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
"*Yawn.* Just more proof that it is Israel (born of terrorism - Irgun Stern Haganah ) who always wants peace, and makes and accepts overtures . . . we shall see . . .

Could you please provide some descriptions and details which characterize the just Israeli independence movement as terrorist in nature.

17 posted on 05/25/2003 9:15:00 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Haber
Yours was a very good post btw.
18 posted on 05/25/2003 9:16:37 AM PDT by veronica (How's about a Palestinian state inside France? It could be called "Francenstine"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
great jubilation here

Are you naive enough to truly believe that the Palestinians can live up to the conditions of the "roadmap," and that they'll be given a state in Judea and Samaria? LOL. You seem to be addicted to disappointment.

Understand that the Arab terrorist organizations and their Saudi-bakced sponsors do not want this agreement to succeed, as much as they might (publicly) say otherwise. If this thing ever gets even close to being signed by all parties concerned, expect a wave of suicide/homicide bombing the likes of which we've never before seen to assure that it doesn't happen. Bush and Sharon are smart enough to know this, of course, and that's why they're merely going through the motions.

....And we're going through these motions for two main reasons: 1) to (hopefully) placate the Arab "street" long enough to take care of all our business - next order of business: Syria - in the region relatively unhindered by Muslim fanaticism, and 2) to show the world once and for all that the Palestinians are simply not capable living up to peace agreements. Regarding #2, it's kind of like the "last chance" we gave to Saddam's regime before we annihilated it. That's why Sharon appears so willing to see this thing through --- he knows the Pallies can't handle it.

As far as the Palestinian "right of return" is concerened, I'm all for it ---- a return to their homeland in Jordan, that is.

19 posted on 05/25/2003 9:28:15 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
>> return to their homeland in Jordan, that is<<

Why no one in the Arab world (and many in the Western world) can seem to understand this is beyond me. It is a simple fact. The Palestine "refugees" are refugees by CHOICE. The are a festering wound held open and infected by the arab world spefically to keep the Middle eEst unstable. This is done (and sadly, sucessfully) to distract the arab populace from realizing they have gone absolutely nowhere and the only reason the Middle East isn't like Africa is oil.

The current plan, if followed by both sides and if Isreal doesn't once again give in to terrorism (they keep encouraging it by capitulating every time a homicide bomber blows himself up), has the best chance of closing this wound once and for all, with one caveat: Splitting up the terrories is going to create a world of logistical problems. I would hope this blatant oversight is corrected once real negotiations begin.

I know I will probably be disappointed again, but I look with cautious optimism at what is underway.
20 posted on 05/25/2003 9:36:57 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson