Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For once, Democrats will sweat an election
Lexington Herald-Leader ^ | May 26, 2003 | Charles Wolf, AP

Posted on 05/29/2003 2:55:29 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Republican Wildcat
Here is the winning campaign ad for the pubbies nationwide;

Scene: Slideshow of poverty-stricken inner city streets, showing all ages, races and plenty of little dirty waifs with big doe eyes.

Voice over: "America, the Democrats only want to help you.(poor folk shown on screen) They've been trying to help you for over 75 years.(more poor folk) Ever since the New Deal.(still more poor folk) And the War on Poverty.(ditto)They've tried their best.(lots-o-poor folk)IT WASN'T MUCH HELP WAS IT?"

Vote Republican and help yourself, America!
21 posted on 05/30/2003 1:28:20 AM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Ben Chandler said his party must establish "a theme of helping people: the average citizen, the average Kentucky family."

It is this "little guy" approach that has brought victory for the KY "democracy" in 1971, 1975, 1979, 1983, 1987, 1991, 1995, and 1999. By implication in KY, if the Democrats are FOR the "little guy," then the GOP must be for the "rich people." So why does one think 2003 will be different with the grandson of Albert Benjamin "Happy" Chandler heading the Demo slate? I guess it could depend on turnout: if the GOP turns out at twice the rate of the Democrats, Fletcher might win.
22 posted on 05/30/2003 5:50:08 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I thought Bush carried Kentucky in 2000. Is that wrong? If a Republican can win the majority of votes in that state for any office, there is hope.

I believe you are correct. He also carried W VA. which totally caught the RATs by surprise. Now if only New England would join the rest of the country and start moving Right. No signs of that happening I'm afraid.

23 posted on 05/30/2003 5:57:11 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Miller allowed that "the Democratic Party might not be the party for every state in this country. But in a state like Kentucky, where more families are in lower and middle incomes, this should be a Democratic state."

That's their line, and it is powerful, but the truth is just the opposite, even at the state level, lower and middle income people benefit more from conservative themes, like right to work laws, friendly tax structure for business, etc.

When the person who signs your check is the declared enemy of your government, you suffer.

Can it be that people are waking up to this truth?

24 posted on 05/30/2003 6:00:24 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Eastern Kentucky has a reputation for Democrat vote fraud--a lot of "pass around money" is used over there.
25 posted on 05/30/2003 2:34:22 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Rush read this article on his show today, and spent an entire segment talking about Miller's quote and how this is the continuation of the Democrat "crack-up."
26 posted on 05/30/2003 2:39:47 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Democrat crack-up in KY???

GOP gubernatorial victories in the 20th Century:

1919
1943
1967

Did I miss one?
27 posted on 05/30/2003 7:50:30 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I just noticed that the 1919, 1943, and 1967 GOP gubernatorial victories in KY are all 24 years apart! So at that rate the GOP should have won the KY governorship 12 years ago! Do you think the GOP will have to wait another 12 years -- 2015?
28 posted on 05/30/2003 7:52:41 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
The bottom line is that the democrats will pay big time for their anti-war stance. Bet on it. They know it, but the press can't bring themselves to admit it.
29 posted on 05/30/2003 7:54:50 PM PDT by AlGone2001 (If liberals must lie to advance their agenda, why is liberalism good for me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Here's a link to what I was talking about (I highly recommend listening to the audio via the link at the bottom of the page).

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_053003/content/stack_a.guest.html
30 posted on 05/31/2003 9:23:32 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson