Skip to comments.
What Wolfowitz Really Said: The truth behind the Vanity Fair "scoop."
The Weekly Standard ^
| 06/09/03
| William Kristol
Posted on 05/30/2003 9:06:20 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
Special edition of the Schadenfreude Ping...
VANITY FAIR CAUGHT IN MASSIVE LIE - PAUL WOLFOWITZ QUOTES *****FABRICATED***** - SPREAD THE WORD!!!
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
21
posted on
05/31/2003 12:10:18 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: xm177e2
It depends how Vanity Fair handles this. If it publishes a full correction and an apology, it should not be added to the list of liars. The specific reporter in question should be, but not the magazine.The magazine and its management are ultimately responsible. Unless their retractions are printed as full stories the size of the original lies, unless every ounce of public relations given to promote their original "big story" is given to promote the retraction - things that have NEVER HAPPENED IN THIS HISTORY OF MODERN JOURNALISM - then Vanity Fair is as responsible as the reporter.
22
posted on
05/31/2003 12:13:19 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Pokey78
23
posted on
05/31/2003 12:42:59 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: Pokey78
bump
24
posted on
05/31/2003 1:20:49 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: xm177e2
It depends how Vanity Fair handles this. If it publishes a full correction and an apology, it should not be added to the list of liars. The specific reporter in question should be, but not the magazine. Are you going to hold your breath? I'm not!!! But seriously I hope they do print a correction and apologize.
25
posted on
05/31/2003 2:26:05 AM PDT
by
Terp
(Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
To: Pokey78
Good catch Pokey78.
To: Pokey78
I must say that I'm really disappointed in Sam Tanenhaus (I assume it's the same one), who's biography of Whitaker Chambers was excellent...
27
posted on
05/31/2003 4:45:48 AM PDT
by
Lyford
To: Howlin
Wonder how much it cost us yearly to maintain the No Fly Zone? An expensive operation we no longer foot the bill for.
28
posted on
05/31/2003 4:50:11 AM PDT
by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
To: Pokey78
I listened to what Wolfowitz said and found it quite honest, truthful and non-controversial. However, the slavering liberals in the media are desperate to gin-up a controversy.
Unfortunately, the rank and file lie-berals will repeat these accusations without reading the article itself or give it much philosophical thought. Does anybody think that the Sunday morning talk shows WON'T be spending their time on this overblown story?
29
posted on
05/31/2003 4:57:44 AM PDT
by
DoctorMichael
(Liberalism = Evil)
To: Pokey78
Pentagon staffers were wise enough to tape-record the Tanenhaus-Wolfowitz interview.Guess Vanity Fair didn't realize they were playing with the first team. Egg once again on the faces of the left's media mouthpieces.
30
posted on
05/31/2003 5:09:36 AM PDT
by
Jimmy Valentine's brother
(MrConfettiman was in the streets while I was still yelling at the TV)
To: Pokey78
Vanity Fair "blaired" what Wolfowitz said.....
To: Pokey78
These liberals should keep up their twisted reporting -- Vanity Scare included -- pretty soon the entire American public will discount news reports the way Conservatives do.
32
posted on
05/31/2003 6:25:35 AM PDT
by
jrlc
To: Terp
You just can't trust those liberal journalists.
To: Pokey78
Furthermore, people of good will are entitled to disagree, even in retrospect, about the wisdom and probable effects of Saddam's forcible removal. Oh, really? Where would that be?
To: Pokey78
Wolfowitz' words, "polished version"
Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the most important casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.
Wolfowitz' words, "unvarnished version"
Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the real casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For propaganda reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason the sheeple could be roused with.
To: Terp
We have our own axis of media weasels........and ought to include the BBC in that deck of cards.
36
posted on
05/31/2003 7:59:12 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: Terp
Vanity Fair, can now be added to the list of liars..................................They have been on the list from the start and are near the top.
37
posted on
05/31/2003 8:28:39 AM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(Negotiate!! .............(((Blam!.)))........... "Now who else wants to negotiate?")
To: Pokey78
They all do it.
What is it?
Lie for the rats to spread BS to damage GW and his administration.
Vanity Fair is no different than the NY Slimes, LA Slimes, Washington Compost, Atlanta Urinal and CNN.
Misquotes like this are as hit pieces.
38
posted on
05/31/2003 8:48:58 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Can anyone ever remember the NY Slimes printing a truthful story? I can't!)
To: Grampa Dave
Come on Coffee, kick in. This should have been:
Misquotes like this are used as hit pieces and our president and his administration.
39
posted on
05/31/2003 8:50:33 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Can anyone ever remember the NY Slimes printing a truthful story? I can't!)
To: iconoclast
Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the real casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For propaganda reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason the sheeple could be roused with.I suppose this is an attempt at cleverness, but unfortunately for your theory, it turns out that the very real torture and oppression of the Iraqi people is the issue the "sheeple" were roused by....and it should have roused the liberals, who love to espouse "human rights" causes in theory, but it's obviously more important to smear Bush and the Pentagon "war mongers" in this case.
As far as the WMD, time will tell, although you've apparently already made up your mind. It must be disappointing for you to learn that Wolfowitz was misquoted, but hang in there, the liberal media will keep trying.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson