Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Wolfowitz Really Said: The truth behind the Vanity Fair "scoop."
The Weekly Standard ^ | 06/09/03 | William Kristol

Posted on 05/30/2003 9:06:20 PM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Special edition of the Schadenfreude Ping...

VANITY FAIR CAUGHT IN MASSIVE LIE - PAUL WOLFOWITZ QUOTES *****FABRICATED***** - SPREAD THE WORD!!!


Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


21 posted on 05/31/2003 12:10:18 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
It depends how Vanity Fair handles this. If it publishes a full correction and an apology, it should not be added to the list of liars. The specific reporter in question should be, but not the magazine.

The magazine and its management are ultimately responsible. Unless their retractions are printed as full stories the size of the original lies, unless every ounce of public relations given to promote their original "big story" is given to promote the retraction - things that have NEVER HAPPENED IN THIS HISTORY OF MODERN JOURNALISM - then Vanity Fair is as responsible as the reporter.

22 posted on 05/31/2003 12:13:19 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
THe UK Telegraph's little pack o' distortion on the vanity Fair interview misquote:

WMD Just a Convenient Excuse for War, Admits Wolfowitz (In Your Dreams, libs)

23 posted on 05/31/2003 12:42:59 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bump
24 posted on 05/31/2003 1:20:49 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
It depends how Vanity Fair handles this. If it publishes a full correction and an apology, it should not be added to the list of liars. The specific reporter in question should be, but not the magazine.

Are you going to hold your breath? I'm not!!! But seriously I hope they do print a correction and apologize.

25 posted on 05/31/2003 2:26:05 AM PDT by Terp (Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Good catch Pokey78.
26 posted on 05/31/2003 2:45:28 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I must say that I'm really disappointed in Sam Tanenhaus (I assume it's the same one), who's biography of Whitaker Chambers was excellent...
27 posted on 05/31/2003 4:45:48 AM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Wonder how much it cost us yearly to maintain the No Fly Zone? An expensive operation we no longer foot the bill for.
28 posted on 05/31/2003 4:50:11 AM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I listened to what Wolfowitz said and found it quite honest, truthful and non-controversial. However, the slavering liberals in the media are desperate to gin-up a controversy.

Unfortunately, the rank and file lie-berals will repeat these accusations without reading the article itself or give it much philosophical thought. Does anybody think that the Sunday morning talk shows WON'T be spending their time on this overblown story?

29 posted on 05/31/2003 4:57:44 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (Liberalism = Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Pentagon staffers were wise enough to tape-record the Tanenhaus-Wolfowitz interview.

Guess Vanity Fair didn't realize they were playing with the first team. Egg once again on the faces of the left's media mouthpieces.

30 posted on 05/31/2003 5:09:36 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother (MrConfettiman was in the streets while I was still yelling at the TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Vanity Fair "blaired" what Wolfowitz said.....
31 posted on 05/31/2003 5:24:52 AM PDT by austinite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
These liberals should keep up their twisted reporting -- Vanity Scare included -- pretty soon the entire American public will discount news reports the way Conservatives do.
32 posted on 05/31/2003 6:25:35 AM PDT by jrlc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terp
You just can't trust those liberal journalists.
33 posted on 05/31/2003 6:51:39 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Furthermore, people of good will are entitled to disagree, even in retrospect, about the wisdom and probable effects of Saddam's forcible removal.

Oh, really? Where would that be?

34 posted on 05/31/2003 6:56:13 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Wolfowitz' words, "polished version"

Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the most important casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.

Wolfowitz' words, "unvarnished version"

Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the real casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For propaganda reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason the sheeple could be roused with.

35 posted on 05/31/2003 7:34:11 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terp
We have our own axis of media weasels........and ought to include the BBC in that deck of cards.
36 posted on 05/31/2003 7:59:12 AM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Terp
Vanity Fair, can now be added to the list of liars..................................

They have been on the list from the start and are near the top.

37 posted on 05/31/2003 8:28:39 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Negotiate!! .............(((Blam!.)))........... "Now who else wants to negotiate?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
They all do it.

What is it?

Lie for the rats to spread BS to damage GW and his administration.

Vanity Fair is no different than the NY Slimes, LA Slimes, Washington Compost, Atlanta Urinal and CNN.

Misquotes like this are as hit pieces.
38 posted on 05/31/2003 8:48:58 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Can anyone ever remember the NY Slimes printing a truthful story? I can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Come on Coffee, kick in. This should have been:

Misquotes like this are used as hit pieces and our president and his administration.

39 posted on 05/31/2003 8:50:33 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Can anyone ever remember the NY Slimes printing a truthful story? I can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the real casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For propaganda reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason the sheeple could be roused with.

I suppose this is an attempt at cleverness, but unfortunately for your theory, it turns out that the very real torture and oppression of the Iraqi people is the issue the "sheeple" were roused by....and it should have roused the liberals, who love to espouse "human rights" causes in theory, but it's obviously more important to smear Bush and the Pentagon "war mongers" in this case.

As far as the WMD, time will tell, although you've apparently already made up your mind. It must be disappointing for you to learn that Wolfowitz was misquoted, but hang in there, the liberal media will keep trying.

40 posted on 05/31/2003 9:01:36 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson