Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SC Black lawmakers say their agenda is stifled
Spartanburg Herald-Journal ^ | May 31, 2003 | LEE BANDY

Posted on 05/31/2003 4:53:02 AM PDT by Captain Shady

Black lawmakers say their agenda is stifled

LEE BANDY
Knight Ridder Newspapers

COLUMBIA -- Most black legislators say they can't get their proposals passed or even considered in the General Assembly because of an age-old problem -- racism. They say if they want to get a bill through the Legislature, they normally have to take it to a friendly white Republican lawmaker and ask him or her to introduce it.

"Black legislators still are searching for equal footing in the General Assembly," said state Rep. Seth Whipper, a black lawmaker from Charleston. "There are problems with complete acceptance by white legislators. "Some people seem not to vote for legislation blacks are involved with."

Several Republicans said race isn't the reason bills by black lawmakers are rejected: The proposals are considered on their merits and dismissed because of differing philosophies.

The problem became public this month when state Rep. Leon Howard, a black Columbia Democrat, and state Rep. John Graham Altman, a white Charleston Republican, almost came to blows after Altman employed a rarely used procedural maneuver to quash a bill Howard introduced. The proposal would have mandated paper coverings on all drinking straws.

Howard, a representative since 1995, called it part of a disturbing pattern of the House blocking legislation offered by black lawmakers.

"When I first got elected, I found out quickly I could not, as a black member, pass a bill on my own," Howard said. "I had to give it to a white lawmaker to get it passed. It was almost like slavery days."

Altman said black authorship is not the problem; it's the type of legislation black members offer. "It's socialistic and liberal," Altman said of the agenda of most black lawmakers. "It has no chance of passing."

An analysis by The State newspaper shows black lawmakers, all Democrats, don't have much success getting legislation passed -- but neither do white Democrats:

--Of 157 bills the 32 black lawmakers introduced this year, only one passed. That bill, offered by state Sen. Darrell Jackson, D-Richland, created a mechanism for black colleges to get state lottery money.

--White Democrats offered 304 bills and saw 16, or 5.3 percent, pass.

--Even House Democratic Leader James Smith, who is white, doesn't have much to brag about. He hasn't gotten one bill of his own through.

Black lawmakers have introduced bills this year addressing issues including increased education funding, better health care for the poor, and criminal justice reforms.

Most of the 19 black lawmakers interviewed said political partisanship is as much, if not more, of a factor than racism in what gets passed and what doesn't. Several black lawmakers declined to talk on the record, saying the topic was too sensitive.

Republicans control the state House and Senate and the flow of legislation. They set the agenda and the calendar.

"Most of it is partisan," said state Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, a black legislator from Orangeburg and former House Democratic leader. "But race is also a factor. Race permeates everything we do here."

When Democrats controlled both chambers in 1993-94, blacks also lagged in getting legislation approved -- trailing even Republicans, all of whom are white. During those years, the General Assembly approved 8.9 percent of the bills proposed by black legislators and 16 percent of those proposed by Republicans.

"It really is kind of sad," Cobb-Hunter said. "You have women and men of color with great ideas, and they never see the light of day unless some Republican decides to sponsor it."

State Rep. Todd Rutherford, a black Columbia legislator, can vouch for that. He recalled two years ago when he tried to get an amendment attached to a DUI bill on the House floor. His measure extended from 10 to 30 the number of days a person arrested for drunk driving had to apply for alcohol and drug abuse counseling. The amendment was going nowhere, he said, until the bill's floor manager, state Rep. Bill Cotty, stood up and embraced the measure. Cotty, a white Republican from Columbia, confirmed the story.

"If we have a good idea, we have to find a white Republican to carry the ball for us," Rutherford said. "If it is a bill authored by a black legislator, we're laughed at. The bill won't go anywhere. Our bills are often called silly" by white lawmakers.

House Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville, took issue with black representatives who say their legislation is doomed.

"I see no indication of that whatsoever," said Wilkins, who is white. "Bills are defeated because of philosophies."

Clemson University political science professor Bruce Ransom, who is black, agreed.

The problem black legislators have, Ransom said, is that much of their legislation "tends to be progressive -- some might say more liberal -- and not in keeping with the mainstream of South Carolina."

ajority Leader Rick Quinn, a white Columbia Republican, said, "Ideas rise and fall on their merits. People aren't going to vote against good ideas offered by black members."

One particular issue -- creation of the state lottery -- is a good example of two very different perspectives in the Legislature. Quinn cites it as an example of a bill initiated successfully by a black lawmaker, state Rep. John Scott, a Columbia Democrat.

Many black lawmakers, however, point to the lottery as an example of how a black lawmaker wasn't given credit for a major piece of legislation. Scott had been pitching a lottery bill for several years. The measure that finally became law looked very much like Scott's bill, but it did not have his name on it, black lawmakers said. It was credited as a committee bill. Several black members were quick to praise Wilkins, saying his actions are not racially motivated.

For instance, they credit Wilkins with naming two black Democrats -- Scott and state Rep. Joe Neal of Columbia -- to key conference committees on the lottery in 1999 and predatory lending this year.

"There certainly is involvement by African-American members," Wilkins said, "and John Scott and Joe Neal are real good examples of that on critical legislation."

Wilkins also has appointed two black committee chairmen -- Joe Brown of Columbia to Medical, Military, Public and Municipal Affairs; and Mack Hines of Florence to Interstate Cooperation.

But this inclusiveness must encompass the entire House leadership, including Republican committee chairmen, black lawmakers say.

State Rep. Jerry Govan of Orangeburg, chairman of the Legislative Black Caucus, agreed with fellow black legislators that legislation offered by them tends to languish in committee longer than others. Also, there is a tendency for other representatives to oppose bills authored by black legislators, he said.

Bills sponsored by black lawmakers "seem to get closer scrutiny." Govan said. "We're very concerned. There's no rhyme or reason to it."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: democrarts; racerelations; republicans
Seems to be more a phisophy thing than a race thing to me. Ask James Smith.
1 posted on 05/31/2003 4:53:03 AM PDT by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady
Yawn. When all else fails, play the race card.
2 posted on 05/31/2003 4:56:13 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Exactly. And the race card is becoming more and more expensive for the Democrats. The more they yell racism, the more they lose.
3 posted on 05/31/2003 5:16:34 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abclily
Caused by racism?...gee, never saw that one coming.< rolls eyes >


4 posted on 05/31/2003 6:12:58 AM PDT by Gringo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: BeechF33A
These legislators should request the NAACP stop the stupid boycott of South Carolina. The entire matter is ugly and hurts business and employees.
6 posted on 05/31/2003 6:35:08 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gringo1
Waving the race card around is caused by racism? Say what?
7 posted on 05/31/2003 10:19:22 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady
Black lawmakers say their agenda is stifled

God damn at least these worthless black lawmakers are allowed to even have an 'agenda'. Can you imagine if there was a 'white lawmakers agenda'. instantly it would be denounced as an evil racist conspiracy. Yet when blacks conpsire to gain special benefits for their race, it's noble and great.

8 posted on 05/31/2003 10:22:29 AM PDT by Godel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady; Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; ...
Prime example of what happens when the parties become racially polarized. Ever since White liberal 'Rats and self-appointed Black shysters (Jesse Jackson, Sr., et al) bamboozled African-Americans into believing their party was the only way to go, it was only a matter of time when realignment in states like SC would render their effectiveness practically dead. They were taken for granted when the 'Rats were in the majority and now they are utterly irrelevent in the lawmaking process with the GOP in control. It's a shame and utterly destructive to the African-American community that keeps sending hard-line Socialistic 'Rats to the legislature. They are so frustrated that they are reduced to screaming "racism" so their shrill voices can be heard and similarly fool their constituents into believing they are fighting for them, when they're only fighting for their own personal political/power gain. The GOP has GOT to go into these communities and ask African-Americans if this is what they're happy with, do they want to continue to send utterly ineffective legislators to Columbia, or do they want someone who will be a part of the power structure and be able to deliver ? Right now, the GOP is cocky in SC, they don't need Black votes, but that is wrongheaded and feeds the perception of racism. It's going to be difficult, but with hard work, it will pay a nice dividend in the long run and do much to help the Black community, which has been wallowing in misery ever since the 'Rats took hold of their souls. It's a very liberating experience.
9 posted on 05/31/2003 5:51:50 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Years ago when I had black students in class, they would nearly always answer "Democrat" when asked the party of Abraham Lincoln. Yet, I had specifically taught Lincoln as the first of the modern Republican party presidents. Nevertheless, they insisted every time on calling Lincoln a "Democrat." Nonblacks almost never did that.

So I think blacks are sticking with Abe Lincoln and the Democrat party, come hell or high water. Many actually associate the GOP with the KKK!!!!
10 posted on 05/31/2003 6:49:52 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Theodore R.
A lot of educating has to be done, but it must.
12 posted on 05/31/2003 7:15:31 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
The GOP has GOT to go into these communities and ask African-Americans if this is what they're happy with, do they want to continue to send utterly ineffective legislators to Columbia, or do they want someone who will be a part of the power structure and be able to deliver ? Right now, the GOP is cocky in SC, they don't need Black votes, but that is wrongheaded and feeds the perception of racism.

Mark Sanford has been a/the leader in making it clear he represents all South Carolinians, whatever race. Give him some time.

13 posted on 05/31/2003 7:22:25 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
It's not just Sanford. This outreach should be done on a county-by-county basis at the grassroots.
14 posted on 05/31/2003 8:09:48 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I agree. Many blacks are conservative,but the GOP has to do more missionary work to find them ,wake them,and activate them.
As you say the GOP is cocky in SC at this time. They would tell you that the future is so bright that they have to wear shades. This cockiness might work against them in the future if their message isn't heard in the non-white population in SC which is nearing 40 percent.
15 posted on 06/01/2003 9:40:09 AM PDT by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady; Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; ...
That's EXACTLY right. It's the % of the population that worries me. More African-Americans are returning to southern states, now that it's largely safe for them to return (safe from KKK nuts and the like, albeit not particularly safe in neighborhoods with high crime perpetrated not by White racists, but by their own people). It really isn't THAT difficult for the 'Rats to elect their own people, since all they have to do is peel off an additional 10-20% of the White vote (the ones who voted for Hodges in '98) and watch as the GOP edge disappears (which could happen in an economic downturn). But turn that around and how easy is it for us to peel off that many more Black voters ? It's VERY hard.

A prime example of this is that people forget that in the early '70s we had White Republican Congressmen representing Downtown Atlanta (now held by 'Rat John Lewis, who is Black), urban DeKalb County (formerly held by Cynthia McKinney), and Downtown Memphis (held by the Ford Family) in VERY polarized districts. Embarrassingly for us in districts that had between 40-50% African-Americans at that time, the White Republicans chose to ignore, rather than embrace and reach out to them, and predictably, by 1974, all 3 seats went 'Rat when the latter were able to pick up a bit more White voters and have never gone back. Anyone ever heard of Sen. Fletcher Thompson of GA ? Nope. You see, Thompson was the last GOP Congressman from Atlanta and as Michael Barone pointed out in 1972, all he needed was a decent increase in his % of the Black vote and he would've defeated a fella named Sam Nunn for the GA Senate seat and become the first Republican Senator since Reconstruction (Thompson is still alive today, and might've still been the Senator there instead of the current Saxby Chambliss). 30 more years we had to wait because that outreach went unheaded. So the next time someone says it isn't THAT important to reach out in Southern states, just point to the example of Mr. Thompson. It's just that important.
16 posted on 06/01/2003 11:44:24 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady
" it's the type of legislation black members offer. "It's socialistic and liberal."

All I had to do to recognize this is to read the title. It's consistent.

17 posted on 06/01/2003 11:51:17 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson