Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz Bombshell: Saddam Behind 9/11 Attacks and OKC Bombing

Posted on 06/01/2003 3:40:37 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

Wolfowitz Bombshell: Saddam Behind 9/11 Attacks and OKC Bombing

Sunday, June 1, 2003

Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, said by some to be the architect of America's war on Iraq, reportedly suspects that Saddam Hussein played a significant role in the three worst terrorist attacks ever on the U.S. - the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Discussing his soon-to-be-released Vanity Fair interview with the top Pentagon official, Sam Tanenhaus told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley on Saturday: "Wolfowitz states that there's a very strong connection, he's convinced, between Saddam and the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993. This is a very controversial idea and yet Wolfowitz embraces it and has for quite some time."

The Vanity Fair writer added, "Also I was told by a source very close to him that Wolfowitz entertains the possibility that Saddam was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995."

While a media firestorm has erupted over Wolfowitz's comments suggesting that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction played a smaller role in the decision to go to war than previously thought, Tanenhaus said the press has missed the real news in his report.

"[There are] allegations he made or that others close to him have made that, to me, are much more startling," the author told WABC's Crowley. "That's what I thought was going to be the news [coming out of this interview]."

In a transcript on the interview released by the Pentagon, Wolfowitz also indicates that he suspects Saddam was involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Asked why Iraq was at the top of the U.S.'s list when it came to taking action in the war on terror, Wolfowitz told Tanenhaus that Saddam's weapons of mass destruction played a role, but then added:

"Plus the fact, which seems to go unremarked in most places, that Saddam Hussein was the only international figure other than Osama bin Laden who praised the attacks of September 11."

Discussing the secretary's comments on MSNBC on Friday, Tanenhaus said that the reason Saddam's role in 9/11 never became the centerpiece of the Bush administration's rationale for war was because there was no consensus on the issue.

"The secretary himself has said both in his interview with me and at other times, particularly in the interview with me, that there were sharp disagreement[s] about, for instance, Saddam's involvement in other acts of terrorism," Tanenhaus explained. He cited the "World Trade Center in '93 and in 2001, September 11, and other connections with al Qaeda."

President Bush's supporters have been mystified over why the administration never spotlighted the claims of two Iraqi defectors, who, two months after the 9/11 attacks, detailed to U.S. intelligence evidence linking Saddam to training in 9/11-style airline hijacking operations.

Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Harold Baer awarded the families of two World Trade Center victims $104 million based on evidence linking the 9/11 attacks to Salman Pak, a terrorist training camp located 25 miles south of Baghdad.

TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; iraq; okcbombing; saddam; wolfowitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-92 last
To: Free ThinkerNY; Mr. Silverback; Sparta; Dan from Michigan; justshutupandtakeit
I've known of the Salman Pak terror training camp containing the airliner fuselage in Iraq since last year from Rush limbaugh's show. He had all the links to the articles about this (mostly from British newspapers) and even satellite photos of the camp on his website before the Battle for Iraq started. In vain I tried to convince the Louisville peaceniks of this but they huffed that I was lying even when I gave them all the same links. The Left will refuse to admit they were wrong but we must continue to counter them anyway.
51 posted on 06/01/2003 4:55:32 PM PDT by BlueOneGolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE do I find my way to the Oklahoma message page?

Click on anyones name and hope they have a state flag flying. Click the flag and it will take to that state's home page. Click "other locations" and find the state you want.

There are other ways but this will get you there.

52 posted on 06/01/2003 5:01:27 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
I have long held that those two boobs, Mcviegh and Nichols, acted with Iraqi help. The rapid call off of John Doe number 2, convinced me there was more to the story. I hate the Clintons, so Im probably blinded by my hatred for him, but OKC was tailormade for Clinton. He was able to denounce terrorism and the Right Wing as a result. I believe he was handed evidence of Iraqi complicity and covered it up for the above mentioned reason, AND to avoid having to do anything that would upset his liberal and socialist agenda. Going to war, you see, would require patriotism and love for your countrys citizens, things that Clinton just doesnt have.
53 posted on 06/01/2003 5:04:58 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Bundesnachrichtendienst is like our intelligence agencies. Permanent bureaucrats. Doesn't change much from one administration to the next.
54 posted on 06/01/2003 5:04:58 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I suspect OKC was the Islamofascists doing Clinton a favor. Homegrown militia types were useful idiots on for the ride. Why not a German spook? He would also be doing the American administration a favor.
55 posted on 06/01/2003 5:07:07 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
I have long held that those two boobs, Mcviegh and Nichols, acted with Iraqi help. The rapid call off of John Doe number 2, convinced me there was more to the story.

Janya Davis, then of the NBC affiliate, named John Doe number two as a former member of the Iraqi National Guard living in OKC at the time.

56 posted on 06/01/2003 5:09:43 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Iraq info
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Thank you for this... I've suspected that not only Wolfowitz, but Cheney has some good knowledge on this as well. He just won't let it slip out yet, like Wolfowitz evidently has.

I think there is a gigantic hair ball of information embarrassing to the United States of American from the failed Clinton, Clinton & Gore administration that a whole lot of people are frantically trying to keep under wraps!!!

57 posted on 06/01/2003 5:20:02 PM PDT by SierraWasp (You have to ask yourself, do you really understand all you know about your adamant position???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
It's not a big stretch and in fact poll after poll on FNC has shown the majority of Americans believe Iraq is behind 9/11. No one asks in polls about OKC, but I've been quite suspicious for some time Iraq was behind that as well.
58 posted on 06/01/2003 5:38:31 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
This is the reason why I supported the Iraq War. This is reason enough for War with Iraq. The WMDs, UN resolutions, and humanitarian concerns are irrelevant.

If the administration came out and said there was a connection to specific terrorist attacks on the US by Iraq such as 9/11 or OkCity the world would not have baulked at us taking action against them so I wonder why they did not do so int he first place. After the fact at a time like this makes it look as if they are searching for a justification since the WMD claims are not around as we claimed them to be.

Even though I do not support the US roll of global policeman and our interventionist policies I would have supported a strike on Iraq if they took out our embassies or the trade center, etc. Personnally I do not think we had to be at odds with Iraq all these years or back in 1990 either but even so a country can not allow a strike like we took without taking substantial counter action (not Clintonian tokanism). I supported our action against Afghanistan but not Iraq because as you said the justification given were "irrelevant" for the latter but substantial for the former.

59 posted on 06/01/2003 6:13:21 PM PDT by u-89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Thanks for the heads up!
60 posted on 06/01/2003 7:15:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
Thanks for the instruction on finding my flag page, Joe!
61 posted on 06/01/2003 8:24:13 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; honway; OKCSubmariner; Nancie Drew
Thanks for pinging me. That's a serious statement about OKC.
62 posted on 06/01/2003 8:48:20 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
So did I. I have heard interviews with others who also say he was involved in these things. This is not just some newbie nutcase making things up as implied here by some.
63 posted on 06/01/2003 8:52:23 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I've believed the same thing. Iraq was knee deep in alot more than WMD.

If I was a conspiracy theorist, I'd start looking at the French and Germans also. Thier huge push for a european superstate to "counter" the US is a little too convienent. Let's see, the US takes a massive attack on a major financial center causing much havoc and putting us into crisis mode demanding all our attention. Don't forget that billions were reportedly moved all around the markets just prior to 9/11.

Then, the we have to use more resources and and turn our attention from domestic issues/economy to the War on Terror.

The weasels complete refusal and active opposition to make things go easy in the UN again ties us up for months. Euro keeps gaining on dollar. Big push made to change oil "dollars" to "euros". Canada and Mexico, who border the US and just really can't compete with us in any way are also on board the weasel ship. Our two closest neighbors who should be with us just because they are our two closest neighbors.

Things were going well with Russia too, Pootie was loved here. Why the big switcharoo? Not only about oil, Russia has nice reserves of thier own, maybe Cold war era debt, but a free Iraq with a market economy would be much better equipped to pay off that debt. So whats with Pootie?

I'd think the whole world hates us, our success, our freedom and our way of life. And IF I was a conspiracist, I'd say a massive campaign to just put the screws to the US was organized behind the scenes, and we could be in the beginning stages of WW4 as well as the War on Terror. WW4 using and manipulating markets, manipulation of opinion by anti-american press, world leaders cutting deals just to screw the americans and try to take us down.

Glad I'm not a conspiracist.
64 posted on 06/01/2003 9:48:51 PM PDT by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The English papers have completely distorted what he said in this interview. Did Vanity Fair do much better?
65 posted on 06/01/2003 10:29:07 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tet68
tis why things that start at newsmax, die at newsmax.

newsmax does have some good columnists now and then, micheal reagan comes to mind, amoung others, but their "news" links on the left side and down center of site is too often sucker bait.
66 posted on 06/02/2003 12:08:27 AM PDT by EERinOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Wallaby; honway; Fred Mertz; rubbertramp; MizSterious

The Vanity Fair writer added, "Also I was told by a source very close to him that Wolfowitz entertains the possibility that Saddam was involved in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995."

27 posted on 06/01/2003 5:55 PM CDT by aristeides

if that was there ace in the hole, why didn't they play it years ago?

67 posted on 06/02/2003 5:26:04 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I left few out.

-Admission by Iraqi scientists that they were instructed to lie to UN weapons inspectors.

-Refusal of SH to account for banned arms materiel we knew he had obtained after the Gulf War and refusal of SH to prove that materiel that was supposed to be destroyed was destroyed.

-Willingness of SH to be deposed (and die) rather than be forthcoming to the UN. This is the most baffling of all. If he had nothing to hide, why would he sacrifice everything? Had he been forthcoming, he'd still be tyrannizing his subjects at this hour. Why did he sacrifice everything just to be defiant? He might have been maniacal, but he was no fool or he wouldn't have remained in power for 3 decades.
68 posted on 06/02/2003 5:26:29 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thinden
Discredit Clinton too much, and you risk destabilizing the two-party system. The Republicans' funders may not like that idea too much.
69 posted on 06/02/2003 5:28:20 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Fight 1 World Government
Said if we didn't find WMD then we were wrong to go to war. No evidence of Saddam being part of 9/11.

Unfortunately, there was/is still little discussion of Iraq's violation of dozens of UN Resolutions during the past decade and what the UN should do to hold member nations accountable for abiding by the resolutions.

If the UN nations had enforced the resolution passed last fall when push came to shove, we wouldn't have had to peddle the WMD angle so hard.

There was plenty of rationale for going into Iraq, the WMD being just one. The other reasons were contained in the dozens of UN Resolutions defied by SH.

Perhaps you could ask your friend who does not support Bush any longer what the UN should do when a country so openly defies its resolutions.

70 posted on 06/02/2003 5:34:24 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
71 posted on 06/02/2003 5:35:49 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
Oh, boy. What a post to wake up to. I'm not a conspiracy theorist either but you sure have made me think in a different direction. All in all, I felt a lot more comfortable when I was only worried about Islamic extremists! I'll be sure to re-read your post a few times and mull all that over.
72 posted on 06/02/2003 6:08:23 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
There's a great book about the Iraqi link to the 1993 attack called "The War Against America: Saddam Hussein and the World Trade Center Attacks: A Study of Revenge"
By Laurie Mylroie, R. James Woolsey
73 posted on 06/02/2003 6:34:35 AM PDT by Heuristic Hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueOneGolf
Correct on both counts.
74 posted on 06/02/2003 7:29:11 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tet68
When chasing ghosts what better could be done than call GhostBusters da, da, da, da, da, da?
75 posted on 06/02/2003 7:30:31 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, said by some to be the architect of America's war on Iraq, reportedly suspects that Saddam Hussein played a significant role in the three worst terrorist attacks ever on the U.S. - the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. +++

OK 95 too? Wolfowitz overdone himself:)). Does it mean that Timoty MacVeigh was wrongly executed?
76 posted on 06/02/2003 12:40:57 PM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
There certainly seemed to be quite a rush to execute McVeigh. Personally, I don't doubt his guilt, but I wish we could have had more testimony from him. I wonder if he would have talked after 9/11.
77 posted on 06/02/2003 12:49:34 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Heuristic Hiker
Thanks for the tip. I've seen Laurie Mylroie in interviews but didn't know about the book.
78 posted on 06/02/2003 4:36:50 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator

To: justshutupandtakeit
Or does the fact he can't be found mean that he never existed either?


81 posted on 06/02/2003 4:59:35 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Professional FReeper. Do not attempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

click on 'My Comments'

then on you name in the upper right hand coner

then on 'My Locale' 5 down on the left
82 posted on 06/02/2003 5:01:33 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Professional FReeper. Do not attempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AmericaIsAlwaysRight
The Middle Eastern connection to Oklahoma City

Indianapolis Star
Jim Crogan
February 17, 2002

Ever since the country was savagely attacked on Sept. 11, the FBI has relentlessly investigated flight schools, airports, universities, mosques, Middle Eastern charities and Muslim communities, looking for connections to al-Qaida or other jihadist groups.

The only stone, it seems, the bureau hasn't been willing to turn over is its own investigation into the Oklahoma City bombing. Presumably, that's because the 1995 terrorist attack was the exclusive work of homegrown extremists Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. Or was it?

Even though McVeigh went to his death denying any larger plot, serious questions remain unanswered. Did John Doe No. 2 ever exist? If so, who is he? If not, why did a second suspect initially emerge? What material or witnesses did the bureau use to create its three sketches of this alleged co-conspirator?

And then there's that troublesome FBI-authorized all-points bulletin issued just minutes after the truck bomb exploded. The alert sent members of Oklahoma City law enforcement searching for two Middle Eastern-looking men seen speeding away from the blast area in a brown Chevy pickup with tinted windows and a bug shield. The APB was abruptly cancelled several hours later without explanation.

The evidence that the Oklahoma City bombing involved a larger conspiracy, one with Middle Eastern connections, is compelling. And the trail begins with that mysterious pickup.

The week after the bombing, Jayna Davis, a veteran Oklahoma City reporter at KFOR-TV, got a tip, which began her investigation of a local property management company. Dr. Samir Khalil owns Samara Properties, and several former employees told Davis they had seen a pickup, matching the APB's description, at the office.

Davis discovered that Khalil, a Palestinian expatriate, had pled guilty in 1991 to several counts of insurance fraud and served eight months in a federal prison. Khalil's court papers indicated that the FBI investigated him for alleged connections to the Palestine Liberation Organization. But Khalil vehemently denied any PLO links. And he's never responded to my calls for comment.

Former Samara employees also told Davis that six months before the bombing, Khalil hired a group of Iraqi refugees to do painting and construction work. This group had allegedly fled Iraq to escape Saddam Hussein's regime. But a Samara employee told Davis he saw them cheering the terror attack and vowing to die in Saddam's service.

Davis then used surveillance camera to take pictures of these Iraqis. Eventually, she focused on one man, Hussain Alhussaini (also known as Al-Hussaini Hussain), who seemed to match the last FBI profile sketch and description of John Doe No. 2.

Over the next several months, she interviewed witnesses who said they saw McVeigh in the company of a Middle Eastern-looking man in the days and hours before the bombing. Using KFOR's photo line-up, they identified that individual as Alhussaini.

Perhaps the most intriguing statements she collected came from a host of staff members at a motel near downtown Oklahoma City. They reported seeing McVeigh with a number of Middle Eastern men at the site in the months preceding the bombing. Using KFOR's photos, those men were identified as Samara employees. Alhussaini was included in that group.

The motel witnesses also said they saw several of the Iraqis moving large barrels around in the back of an old white truck. The barrels, they alleged, emanated a strong smell of diesel fuel, one of the key ingredients used in the Oklahoma City bomb.

Davis also discovered that the mysterious brown Chevy pickup was impounded by the FBI on April 27, 1995. The pickup had been abandoned in an apartment building lot. According to the police report, the truck had been stripped of its license plate, inspection tag and all its vehicle identification numbers. It also was spray-painted yellow, but the original color was listed as brown. One resident at the complex told the FBI the driver was "clean-shaven, with an olive complexion, dark, wavy hair and broad shoulders," in his late 20s or early 30s and of Middle Eastern descent.

Davis also used a hidden camera to interview Lana Padilla, Terry Nichols' ex-wife, about Nichols' repeated trips to the Philippines, a hotbed for terrorist activity. "Tim bought Terry the first ticket for the Philippines," Padilla said. That trip occurred in 1989. His last visit came in November 1994.

Ramzi Yousef, the Iraqi convicted for masterminding the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and a plot to blow up U.S. airliners, operated out of Mindanao and Manila in the Philippines. Yousef received funding from Osama bin Laden. According to a motion filed by the McVeigh defense team, an American fitting Nichols' description met with Yousef in the Philippines in 1992 or 1993.

Davis eventually aired a number of pieces, taking care to disguise the Iraqi's identity. However, Alhussaini voluntarily stepped forward on June 15, 1995, to publicly claim that KFOR and Davis had labeled him as John Doe No. 2.

Alhussaini told Channel 9 in Oklahoma City he was living in fear. He claimed to be working at one of Khalil's properties when the bombing occurred. And he produced a handwritten time sheet as proof. The former Iraqi soldier also denied knowing McVeigh, and demanded a public apology from KFOR.

KFOR and Davis stood by their reports and countered with witnesses who contradicted Alhussaini's assertions, including the time sheet, which was labeled a fabrication. Alhussaini responded by filing a state civil libel suit. However, he withdrew the suit the day before a judge was scheduled to rule on KFOR's motion for summary judgment.

Meanwhile, Alhussaini's suit froze KFOR's coverage of the story. And Davis eventually quit after The New York Times bought the station and the investigation was stopped. The former reporter, who had collected 22 signed affidavits from the witnesses she interviewed, was called to testify before a state grand jury that examined the bombing in 1997. With the witnesses' permission, she gave the grand jury the affidavits.

Alhussaini then refiled his libel suit in federal court. Once again attorneys for KFOR and Davis filed for a dismissal. On Nov. 17, 1999, U.S. District Judge Tim Leonard granted their motion. In his ruling, Leonard stated that all the facts in Davis' report were either true or statements of opinion, and did not libel the plaintiff. Alhussaini then appealed the ruling. A hearing was held on Sept. 10; a decision is pending.

Alhussaini moved from Oklahoma City and was reportedly living in the Boston area. His lawyer declined to give me a phone number for his client.

According to 1997 medical records produced during his federal suit, Alhussaini said he had worked for a while at Boston's Logan Airport (where two of the planes were hijacked on Sept. 11). Quoting from those records, Alhussaini first told his psychiatrist that he had quit his airport job because, "If anything happens there, I will be a suspect." However, he later told his doctor that he "wanted to look for another job because he feels unsafe in the environment he works in, the airport, given the recent events involving his being previously suspected of involvement in the Oklahoma bombing."

Alhussaini's specific job at the airport was never identified. I contacted the Massachusetts Port Authority, which oversees Logan, to obtain dates of employment. A spokesperson said the agency would not release any information.

During the course of her investigation, Davis made contact with Yossef Bodansky, executive director of the 13-year-old Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare. Bodansky told Davis the task force had warned of an impending Islamic-sponsored terrorist attack in America's heartland back in 1995.

On Feb. 27, 1995, the task force had issued its first confidential warning to federal agencies that Islamic terrorists "may soon strike Washington D.C., specifically the Capitol and the White House." This confidential alert, which he said was quietly distributed to federal intelligence agencies and law enforcement, claimed the attacks were to begin after March 21, 1995.

"Striking inside the U.S. is presently a high priority for Iran," stated the warning. The alert also stated that upcoming terrorist strikes might be directed against "airports, airlines and telephone systems." In light of Sept. 11, it was a telling note.

On March 3, 1995, the task force issued an update. This "super-sensitive" alert stated there was a "greater likelihood the terrorists would strike at the heart of the U.S." Bodansky also told Davis that after the truck bombing, he reviewed intelligence data that confirmed, "Oklahoma City was on the list of potential targets."

Bodansky gave Davis copies of the task force's original alert and some of his confidential notes detailing the update and Oklahoma City's target status. His material notes an independent warning from Israeli intelligence a month before the bombing. The warning indicated a terrorist attack was impending and that "lilly whites" would be activated. Lilly whites, Bodansky writes, were people without any background or police records who would not be suspected members of a terrorist group.

Now President Bush has labeled Iran, Iraq and North Korea an "axis of evil." And hyperbole aside, details of Iran's alleged involvement in terrorism were included in last summer's U.S. Department of Justice indictment issued in connection with the Khobar Towers attack in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, Bodansky told me that Iran and Iraq agreed to cooperate in terrorist operations against the West.

Over the past seven months, I reviewed all of Davis' documents, including the material she got from Bodansky. I also conducted my own follow-up interviews and found no holes in her investigation. As for Davis, she's tried twice to give her material to the FBI.

According to her attorney Tim McCoy, Department of Justice attorneys prosecuting Nichols rejected Davis' documents in 1997 because they didn't want more material to turn over to the defense. McCoy testified to this at a recent hearing in Nichols' state murder case.

In 1999, former FBI agent Dan Vogel accepted the material, but he said that higher-ups later rejected it because the agency questioned Davis' ownership rights.

I called the bureau but it declined to explain this strange turn of events. Perhaps if Vogel had been allowed to testify at a recent hearing in Nichols' Oklahoma murder trial, details would have been forthcoming. But the Justice Department refused to let him take the stand.

Is this a case of FBI incompetence, political interference or the Justice Department's desire not to complicate a seemingly open-and-shut case against McVeigh and Nichols? I don't know.

I do know that too many questions remain unanswered. And I wonder: If the FBI had followed through on these leads, might agents have turned up links to sleeper cells or the network that planned the Sept. 11 massacre?

Jim Crogan is a free-lance writer and investigative reporter based in Los Angeles. His work has appeared in Newsweek , Time , the Los Angeles Times and other publications. His e-mail address is

83 posted on 06/02/2003 5:03:13 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY (((Not just an internet conspiracy theory )))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Is it me, or does Vanity Fair have a habit of teasing stuff that just isn't there?
84 posted on 06/02/2003 6:16:04 PM PDT by ChadGore (Frustrate one liberal a day, that's all we ask.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Here's a great quote from Wolfowitz:

"It sort of calls to mind the joke about the President and the Pope are on a boat, and the Pope's hat blows off. The President says, no, I'll get it for you and walks across the top of the waves, picks up the hat and walks back across the top of the waves, hands the hat to the Pope and the next day the headlines are, "President Bush can't swim." [Laughter]


85 posted on 06/02/2003 6:34:57 PM PDT by ChadGore (Frustrate one liberal a day, that's all we ask.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Thanks ever so for the instructions, CyberCowboy.
86 posted on 06/02/2003 9:39:17 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of Richard Nixon
Your wish is my command:

Why, thank you very kindly Mr. President.

87 posted on 06/03/2003 3:23:50 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
88 posted on 06/03/2003 7:14:31 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden
The strangest thing about the OKC bombing was the FBI couldn't decide where to cast the blame. They had so many agitprop scenarios to choose from. It's like central casting.
89 posted on 06/04/2003 4:58:40 AM PDT by rubbertramp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
90 posted on 06/04/2003 9:00:34 PM PDT by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
2 bad this stuff, if true, never came out during the clinton-puken years.

bill needed to get re-elected in 1996 and didn't want any interference.
91 posted on 06/04/2003 9:02:50 PM PDT by liberalnot (what democrats fear the most is democracy .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz


92 posted on 06/29/2005 9:19:26 AM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson