Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz Bombshell: Saddam Behind 9/11 Attacks and OKC Bombing

Posted on 06/01/2003 3:40:37 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Maria S
Re the Smoocher of Suha the blood libeler:

Her foremost critic was flown into the Pentagon.

The radar plot shows a single fast boat speeding away from the crash scene.

A hundred witnesses saw the missile--the CIA cartoon to the contrary notwithstanding.

As for OKC, Laurie Mylroie indicates Ramzi Yousef of WTC I and his supposed uncle Khalid Sheik Mohammed of WTC II/911 were Pakistani Baluch with Kuwaiti passports--indicating they were sheepdipped by Saddam's intel post Kuwait invasion.

Saddam's intel met with Osama and envoys as far back as 1997 and met with Mohammed Atta in Prague no matter what the worthless Deutch appointee Tenet says.

Saddam has been bankrolling other terrorists as well, viz the Palestinian bombers.

To take down Iraq is a blow against the anti-American, anti-Israeli terrorist cartel--witness the rabid fulminating of the anti-Semitic, anti-U.S. crowd worldwide.

Senator Butch touts renewing the assault weapons ban, yet the only mass importation of AK-47s attempted was by her and traitorrapist42's donor Wang Jun.

We have met the terrorists and they have the same last name.

41 posted on 06/01/2003 4:13:20 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, said by some to be the architect of America's war on Iraq, reportedly suspects that Saddam Hussein played a significant role in the three worst terrorist attacks ever on the U.S. - the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.



42 posted on 06/01/2003 4:14:56 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa

Well, if Wolfowitz says WMDs was one of several justifictaions for war weighed against each other, there must have been others.

It was frustrating that 9/11, WTC '93, TWA 800, etc. were not the original reasons used, but I suppose it is simpler for that to come out afterward, when there is no question of war vs. trial.

43 posted on 06/01/2003 4:24:43 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
My question is more basic. Does in fact Andreas Strassmeir in fact fit in anywhere? Sure, he was at Elohim City, and is strongly linked to Tim McVeigh. But was he anything more than a German double agent? Did he play an acvtive role in the planning for OKC?

What is the connection between Strassmeir and Terry Nichols, if any?

I'm more interested in the time Terry Nichols spent in the south of the Philippines, who he met there, and if there is any chance that he is "The Farmer".
44 posted on 06/01/2003 4:29:02 PM PDT by John Valentine (Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Thanks. I'd like to hear more from Wolfowitz on this.
45 posted on 06/01/2003 4:35:52 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (Home page for lease. Terms negotiable. Free 30-day trial period available. See to appreciate....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

-Salman Pak with 737 airplane fuselage.
-The other terrorist training camp on the Iran border.
-Bounty paid by Iraq to families of suicide bombers.
-Iraq official seen in Europe meeting with Atta.
-Al Qaeda honchos found in Baghdad.
46 posted on 06/01/2003 4:41:50 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita; Poohbah; L,TOWM; Grampa Dave; Howlin; Miss Marple; dighton; Chancellor Palpatine; Dog; ...
Perfectly innocent explanations for all of them might exist.

Now, the chance of those innocent explanations existing is slightly worse than my chances of going out with Jennifer Love Hewitt next weekend, but there is a chance.
47 posted on 06/01/2003 4:50:24 PM PDT by hchutch (America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Or does the fact he can't be found mean that he never existed either?

I'm slipping into existential malaise here,
does this mean that the democrats are right when they say,
"What didn't he know and when didn't he know it?"???
48 posted on 06/01/2003 4:53:29 PM PDT by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I wish I had remembered the airplane training camps a few days ago. got in a discussion with someone who I thought was a Bush supporter and is no longer. Said if we didn't find WMD then we were wrong to go to war. No evidence of Saddam being part of 9/11.

Course he had no compassion for the Iraqi people now free either.

I'm sure when we do find them, he will say they were planted.

49 posted on 06/01/2003 4:55:24 PM PDT by Fight 1 World Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: Free ThinkerNY; Mr. Silverback; Sparta; Dan from Michigan; justshutupandtakeit
I've known of the Salman Pak terror training camp containing the airliner fuselage in Iraq since last year from Rush limbaugh's show. He had all the links to the articles about this (mostly from British newspapers) and even satellite photos of the camp on his website before the Battle for Iraq started. In vain I tried to convince the Louisville peaceniks of this but they huffed that I was lying even when I gave them all the same links. The Left will refuse to admit they were wrong but we must continue to counter them anyway.
51 posted on 06/01/2003 4:55:32 PM PDT by BlueOneGolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE do I find my way to the Oklahoma message page?

Click on anyones name and hope they have a state flag flying. Click the flag and it will take to that state's home page. Click "other locations" and find the state you want.

There are other ways but this will get you there.

52 posted on 06/01/2003 5:01:27 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
I have long held that those two boobs, Mcviegh and Nichols, acted with Iraqi help. The rapid call off of John Doe number 2, convinced me there was more to the story. I hate the Clintons, so Im probably blinded by my hatred for him, but OKC was tailormade for Clinton. He was able to denounce terrorism and the Right Wing as a result. I believe he was handed evidence of Iraqi complicity and covered it up for the above mentioned reason, AND to avoid having to do anything that would upset his liberal and socialist agenda. Going to war, you see, would require patriotism and love for your countrys citizens, things that Clinton just doesnt have.
53 posted on 06/01/2003 5:04:58 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Bundesnachrichtendienst is like our intelligence agencies. Permanent bureaucrats. Doesn't change much from one administration to the next.
54 posted on 06/01/2003 5:04:58 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I suspect OKC was the Islamofascists doing Clinton a favor. Homegrown militia types were useful idiots on for the ride. Why not a German spook? He would also be doing the American administration a favor.
55 posted on 06/01/2003 5:07:07 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
I have long held that those two boobs, Mcviegh and Nichols, acted with Iraqi help. The rapid call off of John Doe number 2, convinced me there was more to the story.

Janya Davis, then of the NBC affiliate, named John Doe number two as a former member of the Iraqi National Guard living in OKC at the time.

56 posted on 06/01/2003 5:09:43 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Iraq info
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Thank you for this... I've suspected that not only Wolfowitz, but Cheney has some good knowledge on this as well. He just won't let it slip out yet, like Wolfowitz evidently has.

I think there is a gigantic hair ball of information embarrassing to the United States of American from the failed Clinton, Clinton & Gore administration that a whole lot of people are frantically trying to keep under wraps!!!

57 posted on 06/01/2003 5:20:02 PM PDT by SierraWasp (You have to ask yourself, do you really understand all you know about your adamant position???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
It's not a big stretch and in fact poll after poll on FNC has shown the majority of Americans believe Iraq is behind 9/11. No one asks in polls about OKC, but I've been quite suspicious for some time Iraq was behind that as well.
58 posted on 06/01/2003 5:38:31 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
This is the reason why I supported the Iraq War. This is reason enough for War with Iraq. The WMDs, UN resolutions, and humanitarian concerns are irrelevant.

If the administration came out and said there was a connection to specific terrorist attacks on the US by Iraq such as 9/11 or OkCity the world would not have baulked at us taking action against them so I wonder why they did not do so int he first place. After the fact at a time like this makes it look as if they are searching for a justification since the WMD claims are not around as we claimed them to be.

Even though I do not support the US roll of global policeman and our interventionist policies I would have supported a strike on Iraq if they took out our embassies or the trade center, etc. Personnally I do not think we had to be at odds with Iraq all these years or back in 1990 either but even so a country can not allow a strike like we took without taking substantial counter action (not Clintonian tokanism). I supported our action against Afghanistan but not Iraq because as you said the justification given were "irrelevant" for the latter but substantial for the former.

59 posted on 06/01/2003 6:13:21 PM PDT by u-89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Thanks for the heads up!
60 posted on 06/01/2003 7:15:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson