Mary Cheney ducks out of GOP gay group

Advocate ^ | June 2, 2003 | Advocate

[Clint N. Suhks]

Or from dimwits, as your vote in 2000 attested.

Name calling after only 18 posts? That must be a new record for you sink? Thanks for not disappointing.

[sinkspur]

Either way, like for drug addicts, we should offer them help if they seek it.

Most don't.

Homosexuality is not against the law in 37 states; in those where the practice of it is, the laws are not enforced. Drug usage is against the law in every state that I know of.

[sinkspur]

Name calling after only 18 posts?

Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.

I figured one shot was worth another.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Homosexuality is not against the law in 37 states; in those where the practice of it is, the laws are not enforced. Drug usage is against the law in every state that I know of.

So what does that have to do with whether they need trestment or not? NOTHING. Both are worthy treatment

[Clint N. Suhks]

Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.

What evidence is needed more that probability and statistics?

[sinkspur]

So what does that have to do with whether they need trestment or not? NOTHING. Both are worthy treatment

Drug treatment works; treatment to "cure" gays doesn't.

[Consort]

...outside of economic issues, what would the difference then be, between the GOP and the democratic party? Abortion and thats it I assume?

The GOP overall supports Guns, vouchers, a sensible environmental policy, support for the military and national security, pro tax reform, respect for religion, pro scouting, pro tort reform, conservative judiciary, pro law and order, pro life, pro individual responsibility,...

[SoDak]

After seeing a series of stories in the media lately about gays and the GOP, I'm of the opinion that a lot of people in the media yearn for the old days of the GOP eating their own, and are liking to stir the pot a little and see what might be cooking.

[sinkspur]

What evidence is needed more that probability and statistics?

Probability and statistics are not evidence.

Cite the "evidence" that incestuals support Bush.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Drug treatment works; treatment to "cure" gays doesn't.

What was that about the dimwit with no evidence?

[sinkspur]

Cite your evidence of large numbers of gays turning straight.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Probability and statistics are not evidence. Cite the "evidence" that incestuals support Bush.

Bunk! Probability and statistics for a population this large is proof enough for even the dimest wit.

[TLBSHOW]

bump

[Sonny M]

The GOP overall supports Guns, vouchers, a sensible environmental policy, support for the military and national security, pro tax reform, respect for religion, pro scouting, pro tort reform, conservative judiciary, pro law and order, pro life, pro individual responsibility,...

At least 4 if not 5 of the above, would directly conflict with the gay agenda and homosexuals would be strongly opposed to at least most of this in general, yet orientation shouldn't matter?

How does one say pro-scouting, respect for religion and vouchers, support for the military, and then say sexual orientation doesn't matter

[sinkspur]

Probability and statistics for a population this large is proof enough for even the dimest wit.

So, cite them.

[Clint N. Suhks]

I didn't say "large" numbers of gays change you did, it depends on their willingness to change. I understand it's similar to the success rate of curing Schizophrenia.

[sinkspur]

I didn't say "large" numbers of gays change you did, it depends on their willingness to change. I understand it's similar to the success rate of curing Schizophrenia.

Which is, de minimis.

[Clint N. Suhks]

So, cite them.

If Incestuals are .1% of the voting population then it's likely that Bush got 50,000 votes.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Which is, de minimis.

Not to those who want to change, you have no heart.

[Sonny M]

Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.

With all due respect, 50 million people voted for Bush, I doubt every single one of them was a solid person. For gods sake, I know people who voted for Nader in 1996, voted for Bush in 2000, and are thinking of voting Nader again, because they can't even tell the difference between the two.