The Penguin Ping.
Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!
Got root?
Posted on 06/06/2003 12:56:55 AM PDT by yonif
Microsoft Corp. chief executive Steve Ballmer warned his staff in an e-mail Thursday that cheap Linux-based software is a growing threat to the software titan. He vowed to meet the challenge.
"Over the long term, I'm optimistic about our growth opportunities. But we face significant challenges in the near and mid term," he said in the e-mail, a copy of which was obtained by AFP.
"Non-commercial software products in general and Linux in particular, present a competitive challenge for us and for our entire industry, and they require our concentrated focus and attention," he said.
Linux, a freely available operating system used mostly by businesses, had grown as a rival since IBM Corp. decided two years ago to spend a billion dollars to offer it to customers as an alternative.
"IBM's endorsement of Linux has added credibility and an illusion of support and accountability," Ballmer said.
As businesses fretted about lean budgets and about Microsoft's attention to customers, non-commercial software such as Linux was seen as an "interesting" alternative, he said.
Many customers were looking at Linux because it would let them move to an Intel microchip-based computer while using existing UNIX software skills and applications, he said. Linux is an offshoot of UNIX.
Linux's weakness, however, was the lack of a central body investing in its development in areas such as engineering, manageability, compatibility and security, Ballmer said.
The major new Windows operating system release -- Longhorn -- would put Microsoft back in front, Ballmer said.
But the software titan would not rush to get Longhorn out to customers until it got the program right, he said.
Microsoft had made a big bet on Longhorn, the Microsoft chief executive said.
"One of our board members asked me recently: 'Is Longhorn a bet-the-company product?' I said that would be a pretty good way to put it. Big bets are obviously about putting money down on something you believe in, but more importantly, they're about breakthroughs."
Longhorn was potentially a bigger breakthrough than the first Windows, eventually incorporating almost all Microsoft products, he said.
"People have asked me: if competing with Linux is so important, can the company wait as long as it will take to get Longhorn done?" Ballmer said.
"My answer is twofold. First, the Windows Server 2003 generation of products offers stronger performance and value than Linux in most IT scenarios. Second, while we are not taking a relaxed approach to Longhorn, we will do the work and take the time required to get it right, because it truly is the next quantum leap in computing, which will put us years ahead of any other product on the market."
Which one is worse, Ballmer or Barney the purple dinosaur ?:)
In contrast, Microsoft customers are disabused of any notion of "support and accountability."
More seriously, Longhorn ain't no quantum leap, unless they are so thoroughly foolish as to think Palladium is a quantum leap. Nor does Longhorn "bet the company" in the way that Windows 2000 and XP did by bringing the NT kernel to mass market disktops. There was also no mention of .NET as a competitive advantage against Linux - indicating it isn't.
It all adds up to "We don't have a good response to Linux, but, uh, we have this big late thing called Longhorn, so, uh, could you, like, not ask that again before we ship Longhorn?"
And they say we don't know where Comical Ali is hiding.
Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!
Got root?
The issue is not "PC's", it's SERVERS.
When Linux is as easy to use for the average user things might change. I wouldn't run out and sell my Microsoft stock...
Again, the issue is not the desktop. The "average user" is not the focus. It's the back-end, it's various server-side services, it's the data-center......
Must have been from one of your worst nightmares.:)
It's never stopped them before.....
"Illusion"?
"Support and accountability"???
This from a Microsoft spokesman?
OMG...
I am speechless.
To Martha Stewart??
Ha ha?
Actually, come to think of it, it is an infinite double recursion, which would cause stack overflow in the end.:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.