1 posted on
06/11/2003 2:18:55 AM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: kattracks
The lunatics do indeed run the asylum.
2 posted on
06/11/2003 2:27:26 AM PDT by
Smile-n-Win
(The EU will break up any day, but the USA is here to stay!)
To: kattracks
In other words if you don't like the fact that you are mentally ill you can protest the APA (homosexuality 1973) and have it taken off.
That doesn't mean that they are not mentally ill. Homosexuals are still mentally ill.
3 posted on
06/11/2003 2:28:08 AM PDT by
kuma
To: kattracks
Isn't this argument exactly what Rick Santorum anticipated?
To: kattracks
Chickenhawks need love too. Then killing.
To: kattracks
Again, we don't for the most part blame someone these days for their alcoholism; we don't see it simply as a moral weakness," he added. "We do believe that these people have a disease or a disorder, but we also recognize that in having it that it impairs their function, that it causes them suffering that they need to turn for help," Berlin said.
This guy is still a do-gooder, but at least he recognizes the fact that "doing good" does not necessarily have to entail helping bad people violate others' rights.
9 posted on
06/11/2003 2:48:09 AM PDT by
Smile-n-Win
(The EU will break up any day, but the USA is here to stay!)
To: kattracks
Does this come as a great surprise to anyone? As soon as we started seeing NAMBLA being defended as a legitimate organization, the handwriting was on the wall. What's next, proclaiming that children really have no rights because they are net yet deemed to be persons before the age of consent? We'd better beware the fate of Sodom.
" It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones." (Luke 17:2)
"Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven." (Matthew 18:10)
11 posted on
06/11/2003 2:59:34 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: kattracks
"
Psychiatrists attending an annual APA convention May 19 in San Francisco proposed removing several long-recognized categories of mental illness - including pedophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism and sadomasochism - from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)."
And the trend continues to make all those exhibiting abhorrent mental disorders as normal.
The quality of life slides deeper into the mire.
Common cents? [sense] Why it's a penny, of course.
12 posted on
06/11/2003 3:16:05 AM PDT by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: kattracks
Psychiatry is not a science, it's an agenda
13 posted on
06/11/2003 3:20:29 AM PDT by
mict42
To: kattracks
Psychiatrists attending an annual APA convention May 19 in San Francisco Wonder how they picked that city.
To: kattracks
"And other psychiatrists have written, again in scientific journals, that if children can be forced to go to church, why should 'consent' be the defining moral issue when it comes to sex?" she said.Satan is at work in these people. This is outrageous.
18 posted on
06/11/2003 4:08:25 AM PDT by
gcraig
To: kattracks
Every last one of these f***ing nutcases should be locked in a crazy ward.
19 posted on
06/11/2003 4:09:39 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(POLICE TAGLINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE TAGLINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE TAGLINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE TAGLINE D)
To: kattracks
yes, Let's change the definitions of "normal" behavior. Then we can all be part of a "if it feels good do it society"! The truly sick people are in charge in the mental ward!!!!
21 posted on
06/11/2003 4:16:30 AM PDT by
D. Miles
To: kattracks
Someone can't understand whether they're a boy or a girl, and that's NOT abnormal?
22 posted on
06/11/2003 4:20:04 AM PDT by
jimt
To: kattracks
While obviously "normalizing" pedophilia is crazy (no pun intended), would removing it from the DSM-IV actually help court cases against pedophiles? It would still be illegal, and this could remove the mental-illness defense.
Burgulary is illegal and socially condemned. but a taste for it is not listed as a mental illness and can't be used for defense (though they certainly try a bunch of other avenues).
Just a thought,
LQ
To: kattracks
Homosexual activists have long argued that gender identity disorder should not be assumed to be abnormal. My nomination for the Most Conflicted Statement of the year. Wonder what the reaction of any of these Honorable Doctors would be if they barged in and found "Uncle" Ben diddling their little boy, or little girl?
31 posted on
06/11/2003 4:30:45 AM PDT by
William Terrell
(People can exist without government but government can't exist without people)
To: kattracks
An alternative title for this article could be, "Psychiatric Association Vastly Overrates Its Importance in Determining Criminal Behavior" Like anyone other them them thinks that they define normalcy.
40 posted on
06/11/2003 4:37:59 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: kattracks
"And other psychiatrists have written, again in scientific journals, that if children can be forced to go to church, why should 'consent' be the defining moral issue when it comes to sex?" she said.OMG.
"And other psychiatrists have written, again in scientific journals, that if children can be forced to go to school, why should 'consent' be the defining moral issue when it comes to sex?" she said.
"And other psychiatrists have written, again in scientific journals, that if children can be forced to take a bath, why should 'consent' be the defining moral issue when it comes to sex?" she said.
"And other psychiatrists have written, again in scientific journals, that if children can be forced to clean their rooms, why should 'consent' be the defining moral issue when it comes to sex?" she said.
Those "other psychiatrists" need to be taken out back and whipped until they lose the moral relativism. And the religious bigotry, while we're at it.
To: kattracks
a condition in which a person feels discomfort with his or her biological sex... Homosexual activists have long argued that gender identity disorder should not be assumed to be abnormal.Huh... Well when I feel discomfort about something, when I am physically troubled by something, like that Stoli and cheap bean burritos I had last night, I think you could pretty safely classify that as a disorder. Of the intestines in my case. Disorder, nonetheless.
psychiatrists have argued that there is little or no proof that sex with adults is necessarily harmful to minors. Indeed, they have argued that many sexually molested children later look back on their experience as positive
WTF? Those are some "learned journal articles" that I would like to see.
other psychiatrists have written, again in scientific journals
Ooooooo... I'm all IMPRESSED.
Any yahoo can write up anything s/he wants in a "scientific" journal. And: some journals are more scientific than others.
50 posted on
06/11/2003 5:18:25 AM PDT by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: kattracks
The slippery slope at work.
51 posted on
06/11/2003 5:21:29 AM PDT by
Kuksool
To: Torie
People whose sexual interests are atypical, culturally forbidden or religiously proscribed should not necessarily be labeled mentally ill, they argued.This is why I fight the tide and always will.
52 posted on
06/11/2003 5:21:52 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson