1 posted on
06/17/2003 4:06:48 PM PDT by
xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
Bump/bookmark.
2 posted on
06/17/2003 4:09:22 PM PDT by
Rocko
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
To: xsysmgr
Thanks for posting
4 posted on
06/17/2003 4:42:57 PM PDT by
OREALLY
To: xsysmgr
bump for later reading
5 posted on
06/17/2003 4:44:41 PM PDT by
boxerblues
(God bless the 101st and keep them safe)
To: xsysmgr
...so what. The same kind of stuff happened all the time in socialist countries throughout the world without us lifting as much as one finger to put an end to the atrocities. Saddam is/was an evil despot, so is Robert Mugabe. I don't see us threatening him. Mr. Murdock thinks the ends justifies the means.
To: xsysmgr
To conclude: no WMD whatsoever. Saddam was NOT a threat to us or the world because he didn't have WMD's. Lacking WMD's, disarming Saddam is impossible unlesss we are talking dismemberment.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson