Posted on 06/22/2003 11:46:04 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier
You nailed it brother, keep preaching.
Bread and circuses anyone? Social holidays? Make work programs? Or did you miss studying that period of Republican history?
Your scenario appears ever more likely. After President Bush's prescription drug rip-off is enacted, and then compounded and expanded by "bipartisanship" (that's when Republicans act like Democrats), an Amnesty for Illegals will be presented as a necessity for the survival of America.
Would we let the likes of AlGore get away with this?
Remember the statement by a Democratic Presidential runner? "Take two tax cuts and call me in the morning"! Well, we have had 2 tax cuts, and at the same time our defense spending has increased. The POTUS gives speeches and (gasp) says "may God bless America" at the end of them. Also when is the last time that Democrats in the house and senate have been seen scrambling for an issue and a way to better the the conservative agenda?
If it IS incramentalism, I'm all for it for we HAVE advanced to a proper goal. More so than we have in a decade!
Hey, don't try to confuse us all with a bunch of outdated words you found in some archaic document or other. The Founding Fathers couln't possibly have foreseen the needs of modern society and the political situation of the current administration. < /sarcasm>
I find you to be right most of the time. IMO you are a lot more knowlegable and insightful than you give yourself credit for.
Maybe not but I guarantee you will appreciate his agenda.
I ain't very smart, but that don't make no sense.
It isn't. It's a multi-trillion dollar moneypit, and a boon to the forces of big, wasteful government. That my be your goal,it may be President Bush's, but I do not share it.
President Bush's Prescription Drugs Wealth Redistribution Act issn't necessary to win re-election, and is taking our party in the wrong direction.
You'd oppose this if AlGore was pushing it. Is it all about blindly following along, just for the sake of votes?
Imagine the cost of asprin if Bayer was the sole producer?
If Standard Oil and kerosene is any indicator then aspirin would be cheaper (inflation adjusted) than at any other time in history under a Bayer monopoly...
Its a well worn myth that monopolies always create higher prices. Past a certain point cheaper alternatives are sought out.
Democracy as created by the Athenians and Republican govt as perfected by Rome (Rome did not invent the overall concept) had as its basis some sort of social welfare program. The Athenian system was not free socialim like we know it-they were more like make work programs--something for something-not a free handout-the citizen had to work for his wage. The Roman Republic was more of what we would call a socialist state because their was no contingent for your bread. It was owed to you just because you existed.
So direct democracy actually is better off at fighting socialist welfare tendancies than a republic which tends to be more welfare oriented in development.
Either we are completely through the looking glass, or the corpse of John Maynard Keynes is now a Freeper.
I would oppose it if Algore was pushing it yes. Blind? Far from it! I don't get stuck on issues and instead look at the overall situation when I see an action plan in play, which I see our sitting POTUS laying out. If Algore were POTUS we would be focusing on issues instead of an overall change in our situation as Dubya' has focused on. I.E. Abortion, Global Warming, World unity, Internal cumbustion engines, power mowers....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.