Gays Overjoyed, Conservatives Despair Over Sodomy Ruling (Mega-barf ALERT)

Associated Press ^ | 06-26-03

[pyx]

why we have to be bombarded with gay rights issues contantly.

Because the Homosexualist Lobby (AKA The Cult Of The Anus) insist that you affirm their particular coupling methodology that identifies their very existance. In other words, because they jam a man's penis into the anus of some other man, that in of itself is what identifies their very reason for existance. Its a form of dominaton and submission. (In some primitive warring cultures it was used as a means of humiliation and to establish a heirarchy.) And by insisting that you and your pre-teen children fully understand every detail of their coupling methodologies, they indirectly get to dominate (or if you wish, to ideologically sodomize) you.

Their apparachiks in the LEFTIST media are only too happy to metaphorically hold you down while you are gang-banged nightly by the LEFT on the tee vee and local radio.

Of course you are expected to shut the hell up and take it because that's exactly what you have done thus far. The LEFT knows you will be compliant because you have been compliant during previous @$$rimmings.

[RAT Patrol]

Exactly. You tell me that if the police were beating down your door you'd continue. Conservatives need to get with the new program. Courts are the way to go. Sue your way to victory. Who needs legislatures? Save money and get rid of 'em.

[oceanview]

that's not what this case was about, and its not really about the sodomy laws either. Its about adoption, gay marriage, the ability to legally teach the lifestyle in the public schools, etc. Things like the ability to have legal wills, or health care proxies, those are chicken feed. Keep your eye on the big three: adoption, marriage, schools.

[2rightsleftcoast]

I don't want us to play the lefts game of let's sue everybody, but I would love our leaders to speak out much more forcefully on the complete hyprocrasy of the other side.

[2rightsleftcoast]

Wow! Great post.

[longtermmemmory]

look for the std spike in 6 months

[longtermmemmory]

it a decision that should have been made at the state level not the supreme court. This is a state legislation. Its not about homsexual soddomy its about the origins of legislation.

[Lazamataz]

I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist Theocracy.

[Imagine]

Homosexuality:

Homosexuality is deviant sexual behavior and a mental illness.

Homosexuals: 1) subject their body parts to uses nature did not intend, such activities often presenting immediate risk to the participants; 2) are prone to greater suicide, depression and other mental disorders and deficiencies than the heterosexual population at large; 3) are prone to far greater sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, than the (normal) heterosexual population; 4) molest young people (pedophilia) at a far greater rate than heterosexuals; 5) engage in degrading sexual promiscuity, oftentimes engaging in risky sex with many partners during the same event; 6) are engaged in aggressive and widespread efforts to indoctrinate our children by introducing the homosexual lifestyle using public schools as the primary indoctrination “vehicle” and likewise, through the movie/music/TV industry, with the dual goals of gaining school-age acceptance of homosexuality and encouraging sexual activity among children, especially same-sex experimentation; 7) view most everything through a mindset heavily biased in favor of the homosexual lifestyle and culture, which renders them mostly useless when asked to opine on matters that normal heterosexuals better resolve.

The mental deficiencies described herein applying to homosexuals shall not be confused with the deficiencies associated with the left wing democrat/socialist/Marxist/ feminist/environmentalists, etc., mind, which have their own distinct set of mental disorders.

This doesn't even touch on what the Bible has to say about homosexuality.

[jwalsh07]

I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist Theocracy

I dissent, the reasoning in the majority opinion does away with the necessity for legislatures, legislators and states.

Applauding this opinion is like giving a tip to the executioner. Judicial activism at it's all time worst.

[The Old Hoosier]

You guys should read Scalia's dissent before you dismiss 3,000 years of civilization so easily.

[Petronski]

I wonder how many freaks will celibrate my taking it up the a** tonight

What a horribly unfortunate typographical error! LOL

[tdadams]

Too late, [AIDS] already gets 20 times what cancer research is getting.

Won't you post us a link where you get that number and then I'll post a link from the National Institute for Health showing that your assertion is an outright and wildly ridiculous lie.

[PhiKapMom]

Very well stated -- the RATs that hated the SCOTUS love them now!

What gets me is that the Justices who were opposed to getting involved in Florida now think it is alright to overrule a State.

Something is wrong with that picture!

[longtermmemmory]

why do we even have states any more? Why not just get rid of the electoral college and all state borders. We could save trillions by eliminating not only state government budgets, but the state governments themselves.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.(/s)

[PhiKapMom]

Very good points!

Then we have the DemocRATs that planned to demonize the judges that would be appointed by Republican Presidents if the RATs didn't get out and vote. I don't think their voting numbers are going to compare to conservatives fed up with activist, liberal judges.

[longtermmemmory]

You forgot about the NJ sentor switch.

It seems to be a bedroom issue. It may just be that outside the bedroom, the rules will change. This would mean that states can regulate homosexual adoption, dual sex mariage, and public istitutions.

The danger is that this opinion may have reduced marriage from a societal institution to a mere contract. (massachusetts alert for reasoning predictions)

[tdadams]

it a decision that should have been made at the state level not the supreme court. This is a state legislation.

The USSC did in this case exactly what they're supposed to, weigh the constitutionality of the laws. It heard the arguments and decided this Texas law was unconstitutional. They did not legislate from the bench.

The same crowd who is droning on, accusing the USSC of judicial activism are the same usual suspects who were probably pleased as punch when the court ruled against state laws allowing assisted suicide and medical marijuana.

Somehow I'm sure you'll find a way of reconciling the hypocrisy, but it certainly takes a special form of denial to do so.

[tdadams]

It's not every day you see such a bold confession here on FR.