Skip to comments.
Hillary is no match for Condi
National Post ^
| June 28 2003
| Elizabeth Nickson
Posted on 06/28/2003 9:26:21 AM PDT by knighthawk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: 7 x 77
Even nuns live in a community, and are married to Jesus Just like those great priests, right?
To: 7 x 77
>>People give up a family for a career are workaholics, whose judgement is suspect. Even nuns live in a community, and are married to Jesus, who has Condi given herself to? <<
Excuse me? How about the entire free world? I think if it was a guy, you wouldn't have any problem with Nr. Condasi Rice. I am NOT a liberal (not even close -- I am actually a social troglodyte), but I think that women who want career first are OK (given my posted caveats). That is what separates us from the paleo-cons.
I guess having a women who is that capable is threatinging to you.
42
posted on
06/28/2003 11:33:39 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Peace through Strength)
To: Positive
Miner corrections, Hillary Clinton never had a commodity trading account, Hillary Rodham did though. Also Ms. Rodham's deposit in her account was $1,000 not $10,000, so her return was 100 times not 10 times. Finally, Ms. Rodham's husband was running for Gov. at the time and need some sizable contributions. And as I recall there were some doubts as to weather she actually put up the $1,000 to begin with. It was a credit account. So that would make it a 100,000 times.
Lets face it she is a snake. She was the one who came up with the idea to put a clause in the Whitewater land accounts that if the buyer missed, I believe 2 consecutive payments, that all previous payments reverted to rent. She is a true snake. Lower perhaps.
43
posted on
06/28/2003 11:38:01 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: rvoitier
Hence, the massive support will come in the form of rigged elections, the dead voting, importation of illegal aliens, disqualification of military votes and who knows what else. Don't forget, that about 43% of the idiots out there, will vote democrat, even if Satan himself was running. I think many people are not taking the Hildebeast seriously. She can win, and unfortunately, I believe she will. The thought makes me vomit, and I sure hope I am wrong, but don't take that scum sucking female senator from New York lightly.
44
posted on
06/28/2003 11:40:24 AM PDT
by
Mark17
To: freedumb2003
I think if it was a guy, you wouldn't have any problem with Nr. Condasi Rice. I'd also be suspicious about a man who gave up family for work. Most of the people on Condi threads don't even look at the issue -- talk about a naive view of what constitutes a balance, mature adult, whose judgement can be trusted.
45
posted on
06/28/2003 11:43:43 AM PDT
by
7 x 77
To: Terpfen; Restorer
"Luckily Europeans don't have a vote here." "Europeans don't vote in American elections."
Are you sure about that?
.
46
posted on
06/28/2003 11:43:54 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: jocon307
You are right, Hillary! would just love this article! I doubt hrc loved hearing this:
"The suspicious amongst us have been ploughing through Living History, her flatulent self-aggrandizing piece-o-crap, albeit best-selling, account of her ghastly life"
To: BunnySlippers
Boy, you're just a bundle of wonderfullness, aren't you? My cup of wonderfulness is pressed down and overflowing.
48
posted on
06/28/2003 11:45:48 AM PDT
by
7 x 77
To: freedumb2003; 7 x 77
I read an article recently that hinted at "dirt" being compiled by dems on Condi. Looks like a whisper campaign on Rice's private life (you can guess) is starting up and 7 x 77 is joining it with gusto.
For the record, I don't believe a word of it.
To: cake_crumb
"I don't either, but DO see the CONSTANT media hype (both positive and negative) as a tool to put Hillary!'s name in the forefront of voters minds" And never underestimate the extent and strength of RAT voter fraud, especially in the urban RAT strongholds. Doesn't it strike you as a little odd how the last couple of counties, generally with high populations, manage to get their votes turned in last, especially in tight electins, and manage to turn the election? And what about counties where there are more registered voters than there are people who are legally eligible to vote, ensuring a better than 100% turn-out at the polls? And consider how the RATs block any legislation that would cut down on voter fraud while at the same time promoting any legislation which would make it easier. As long as all these loopholes in election law exist, we can never be assured of the fairness of an election again, and we can never be certain that a demon like Hillary won't get into the presidency as a result.
50
posted on
06/28/2003 11:54:49 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: knighthawk
Condi certainly has the LOOK to take on Hitlery! And she's also got the brains, communication skills, and foreign policy experience!
GO CONDI GO!
51
posted on
06/28/2003 11:58:30 AM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04........Across America!)
To: knighthawk
Amen.
"To win the War on Terror, we must win also win a war of ideas by appealing to the decent hopes of people throughout the world . . . giving them cause to hope for a better life and brighter future . . . and reason to reject the false and destructive comforts of bitterness, grievance, and hate. Terror grows in the absence of progress and development. It thrives in the airless space where new ideas, new hopes and new aspirations are forbidden. Terror lives when freedom dies." ~ Dr. Condoleezza Rice, June 26, 2003.
"I know my husband received the same intelligence information [during his presidency as did Bush]." (how would SHE know either her hubby or Bush's classified intel?) Clinton asserted that "the real question is have we obtained accurate information, or have the findings been altered for military or political purposes?" ...America should seek "a secure and solid foundation" for relations with Europe, instead of "relying only upon our [U.S.] military strength." .. "for eight years we were on the right course to a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other." ...In the Der Spiegel interview, Clinton asserted that her husband sought to pass "effective laws" and proposed "more money" to carry out the struggle against terror, but "the Republicans prevented" measures from becoming enacted. ~ Hillary Clinton, June 17, 2003
52
posted on
06/28/2003 11:59:50 AM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(There has been a lot of action lately-a lot of it INSTIGATED by Coalition forces.-Gen Myers, Jun 24)
To: cyncooper
Looks like a whisper campaign on Rice's private life (you can guess) is starting up and 7 x 77 is joining it with gusto. The bigger question is what kind of unthinking person wouldn't wonder. You guys are espousing a fantasy world fit for a liberal.
53
posted on
06/28/2003 12:02:55 PM PDT
by
7 x 77
To: knighthawk
The suspicious amongst us have been ploughing through Living History, her flatulent self-aggrandizing piece-o-crap Yes sir, the only fitting place for Hillary's flatulent piece of crappola is to read it in a two-holer without a Sears catalgue.
54
posted on
06/28/2003 12:03:13 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: 7 x 77
I'd also be suspicious about a man who gave up family for work. What planet are you from?
55
posted on
06/28/2003 12:16:18 PM PDT
by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Texans)
To: freedumb2003
"But if Hitlery would be on the ballot, I would pledge my Life, my Fortune and my Sacred Honor to keep her out of office. I believe I am not alone." I think you're probably right. Even people who are not interested in politics are not neutral when it comes to Hillary. They either buy all the garbage about her being the smartest woman in the world, blah, blah, blah, or they hate her with a passion. I know my dad, who admits to not having voted in a very long time, said that if Hillary ran he would have to vote...against her.
56
posted on
06/28/2003 12:23:08 PM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: lonestar
Another symptom of America's decay:
I'd also be suspicious about a man who gave up family for work.
What planet are you from?
Look how lost we are. Even on a "conservative" Web site like FR there is a big group of people that don't see anything suspicious about a person giving up family so they can work all the time.
57
posted on
06/28/2003 12:24:44 PM PDT
by
7 x 77
To: rvoitier
Exactly! Who the heck was Bill Clinton??? Next thing I knew, I was hearing a guy who couldn't have gotten security clearance to enter the White House any other way was elected President. All the scandals, all the breaches of security, all the lives lost in the aftermath, and people ask how Hillary will be elected President? I can't believe my eyes! Unless she's less determined than her husband, she won't fail to be there whatever it takes. Believe me, she'll work even harder for herself than she did for the cracker she married.
To: 7 x 77
Look how lost we are. Even on a "conservative" Web site like FR there is a big group of people that don't see anything suspicious about a person giving up family so they can work all the time.You missed the point; proved my point. You seem to be "suspicious" about everybody who isn't like you.
You remind me of the preacher I know who is always preaching "a woman's place is in the home." People laugh at him because he ignores that his wife works, comes homes and cooks dinner for him while he sits on his rear all day doing nothing. They can't live on his retirement so she has to work. He doesn't have enough sense to know he doesn't practice what he preaches; thinks he is perfect! That's "suspicious" to me.
I also suspect that you're "bearing false witness" about Condi Rice. You are free to live your life as you please. Who are you to judge how other's live their's.
"Conservative" doesn't mean minding everybody else's business.
59
posted on
06/28/2003 12:42:27 PM PDT
by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Texans)
To: lonestar
You are free to live your life as you please. Who are you to judge how other's live their's. How very Democratic of you. Let's not look with a critical eye at anybody's behavior. Unfortunately, more and more, this also very Republican of you.
60
posted on
06/28/2003 12:53:27 PM PDT
by
7 x 77
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson