To: Restorer
"Where is the massive support for Hilary? I don't see it."I don't either, but DO see the CONSTANT media hype (both positive and negative) as a tool to put Hillary!'s name in the forefront of voters minds, so that when she does run she stands a better chance of being elected...on the other hand, 70% of the voters in this country don't want Hillary to run for president, ever.
Jeb Bush has as good or better a chance of beating Hillary! in '08 as Condi.
16 posted on
06/28/2003 9:55:14 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: cake_crumb
>>I don't either, but DO see the CONSTANT media hype (both positive and negative) as a tool to put Hillary!'s name in the forefront of voters minds,<<
Hiltlerry running would probably be a great thing! I think it will create a conservative groundswell that could eliminate liberals for a generation -- the reverse of what happened when Wilson got the latinos going in California.
Right now, I am a little active in politics -- willing to help out, donate, keep informed, etc. But if Hitlery would be on the ballot, I would pledge my Life, my Fortune and my Sacred Honor to keep her out of office. I believe I am not alone.
19 posted on
06/28/2003 10:01:46 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Peace through Strength)
To: cake_crumb
"Where is the massive support for Hilary? I don't see it." Our problem is we think like law-abiding, clean, decent Americans. However, what we're dealing with are criminal, ends-justify-the-means, Socialists/Marxists.
Hence, the massive support will come in the form of rigged elections, the dead voting, importation of illegal aliens, disqualification of military votes and who knows what else.
25 posted on
06/28/2003 10:33:54 AM PDT by
rvoitier
(There's too many ALs in this world: Al Qaeda Al Jezeera Al Gore Al Sharpton Al Franken)
To: cake_crumb
"I don't either, but DO see the CONSTANT media hype (both positive and negative) as a tool to put Hillary!'s name in the forefront of voters minds" And never underestimate the extent and strength of RAT voter fraud, especially in the urban RAT strongholds. Doesn't it strike you as a little odd how the last couple of counties, generally with high populations, manage to get their votes turned in last, especially in tight electins, and manage to turn the election? And what about counties where there are more registered voters than there are people who are legally eligible to vote, ensuring a better than 100% turn-out at the polls? And consider how the RATs block any legislation that would cut down on voter fraud while at the same time promoting any legislation which would make it easier. As long as all these loopholes in election law exist, we can never be assured of the fairness of an election again, and we can never be certain that a demon like Hillary won't get into the presidency as a result.
50 posted on
06/28/2003 11:54:49 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: cake_crumb; All
re: her support, remember (this, from a former resident and native of NYC) that she waltzes into Chappaqua about 14 months before the 2000 senatorial campaign and - on the backs of the 8-1 RAT majority in New York coupled with Guliani's having to bow out for health concerns - won the seat for that state.
Basically, the RAT constituency in New York prostrate themselves before their "queen" - and I suspect that many other RAT serfs throughout the country will be more than willing to do the same when she runs.
CGVet58
63 posted on
06/28/2003 1:19:26 PM PDT by
CGVet58
(I still miss my ex-wife... but my aim is improving!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson