Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State's Jobless Benefits Fund at Risk of Running Dry Next Year (Titanic is Going Under)
The LA Times ^ | July 4, 2003 | By Marla Dickerson

Posted on 07/05/2003 3:19:29 PM PDT by Pubbie

California's unemployment insurance program will run out of funds to pay jobless workers by early next year, state officials warned Thursday, making it highly likely that employers will have to pony up more money to keep the troubled system afloat.

The program's finances are deteriorating so rapidly that the state Employment Development Department announced it was forming a special panel to discuss overhauling the system, which is fast being drained by a crush of jobless claims as California's economy continues to struggle.

The agency's main options include borrowing from the federal government or increasing the unemployment insurance taxes on employers — neither of which would sit well, given the rancor over the state's budget crisis and growing complaints from businesses.

Employers, who foot 100% of the cost of jobless benefits by paying a tax on the first $7,000 of employees' wages, were already hit with an increase in their unemployment insurance rates early this year.

California officials had hoped that the increase, along with a recovering economy, would help the state avoid a meltdown in the jobless benefits program. But a weak labor market and long stretches of joblessness for many have battered the state safety net, which is paying out cash benefits to about half of California's 1.1 million unemployed workers.

At the end of May, the unemployment trust fund stood at $3.2 billion, half of what it was a year ago. State officials project that the fund will fall into the red by January and could be $1.1 billion in the hole by the end of 2004 if steps aren't taken to inject more money into the system.The health of the fund "has changed dramatically as the result of the prolonged recession," said EDD spokeswoman Loree Levy. "We need to come up with some solution as soon as possible."

She said the panel, which will consist of representatives from labor, business, the public sector and academia, will probably explore a number of options.

Among the obvious, she said, would be borrowing from a federal fund set up specifically to help states bridge shortfalls in their unemployment insurance programs, a path already taken during this economic downturn by Texas, New York, Minnesota, Missouri, Illinois and North Carolina.

But that is just a stopgap. Levy said the panel probably would take a hard look at the program's taxable wage ceiling, which has remained at $7,000 since 1984 and is among the lowest in the nation. Raising that ceiling would require legislative action, a move that appears highly unlikely this year, given the other fiscal crises that are consuming lawmakers' attention in Sacramento.

"The odds of the Legislature doing something at this time are slim and none, and slim left town," said Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco).

Business leaders, for their part, were outraged on Thursday to hear that state officials would even be considering another tax on businesses at a time when so many were fighting for survival. In recent years, California companies have been hit with a flurry of increases in their business costs, from rising minimum wages to higher energy rates and soaring workers' compensation premiums.

"This is like pouring water on a drowning man," said Jack Stewart, president of the California Manufacturers and Technology Assn. "California businesses are already struggling to stay afloat."

Stewart said he and other business leaders had opposed legislation passed in 2001 that boosted jobless benefits this year and will nearly double the maximum payout by 2005. Employers had warned the Legislature that raising jobless benefits without first reforming California's unemployment insurance system would wipe out the trust fund. Stewart also said that California's safety net extended benefits to part-time workers and others who would be ineligible for such assistance in most states.

"We told them that this was going to bankrupt the system — and we were right," Stewart said.

Claims for jobless benefits have spiked as unemployment in the state has jumped from a pre-recession low of 4.7% in early 2001 to 6.6% in May. And the workers receiving benefits are staying jobless longer. The average duration of a claim is currently 19 weeks, up from 15 weeks in 2001. The maximum amount of time most workers can receive benefits is 26 weeks.

The system also is being strained by higher benefits. In January of this year, the maximum weekly benefit increased to $370 from $330 last year and $230 in 2001. The top weekly benefit will increase to $410 next year and hit $450 in 2005.

Another factor in the larger payouts is that so many jobless workers have come from high-wage sectors, such as technology, that have qualified them for the maximum benefit. The average weekly benefit amount is currently $242, up 43% since 2001.

California has a so-called "flexible funding" system that results in employers paying lower unemployment tax rates in boom years when unemployment is down and there are fewer demands on the trust fund. The flip side is that they have to shell out more during recessions through higher rates to keep up with rising claims.

Employers were hit with an increase earlier this year, which calls for companies with the best claims histories to pay $63 per employee annually and those with the worst histories to pay $378 per employee.

Existing law would allow the state to require employers to contribute even more next year, which would boost the lowest rate to $91 per employee and the top rate to $434, according to Levy. However, EDD officials have calculated that, even with that projected increase, the fund would still end 2004 more than $1 billion in the red.

Any way you slice it, said Inland Empire economist John Husing, employers will be forced to pay more to bail out the program, adding to the burgeoning business costs that are hampering job growth in California...

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: budget; calgov2002; california; deficit; graydavis; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2003 3:19:29 PM PDT by Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Employers had warned the Legislature that raising jobless benefits without first reforming California's unemployment insurance system would wipe out the trust fund. Stewart also said that California's safety net extended benefits to part-time workers and others who would be ineligible for such assistance in most states. "We told them that this was going to bankrupt the system — and we were right,"
2 posted on 07/05/2003 3:21:58 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; Coop; ...
*Ping*
3 posted on 07/05/2003 3:22:39 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; *calgov2002; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; snopercod; Grampa Dave; ..
Good picture!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



4 posted on 07/05/2003 3:24:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If you look carefully at the picture the name on the ship is the S.S. California a sister ship to the Titantic and has just hit a democRAT iceburg. The name of the iceburg is "spending run amok". She is sinking very fast. They are trying to lower the life boats and I can just make out one of the names an it is called "Recall Davis". Looks like to little to late and a lot of lives are going under. Parley
5 posted on 07/05/2003 3:32:45 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Stewart said he and other business leaders had opposed legislation passed in 2001 that boosted jobless benefits this year and will nearly double the maximum payout by 2005. Employers had warned the Legislature that raising jobless benefits without first reforming California's unemployment insurance system would wipe out the trust fund. Stewart also said that California's safety net extended benefits to part-time workers and others who would be ineligible for such assistance in most states.

Somedays I just can't help but feel like John Galt. Let the whole freakin' mess crash and burn ... courtesy of the 'crat run legislature and the incompetent 'crat slezebag governor.

6 posted on 07/05/2003 3:34:23 PM PDT by SamKeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Thanka yooo ladies anduh germs... Anduh now, here's a-uh littleuh chtune to go witha the thread... Take it uh-way, Celine...

Every night in my dreams I see you, I feel you, That is how I know you go on.

Far across the distance and spaces between us You have come to show you go on.

Near, far, wherever you are, I believe that the heart does go on.

Once more, you open the door And you're here in my heart, And my heart will go on and on.

Love can touch us one time and last for a lifetime, And never let go till we're gone.

Love was when I loved you, one true time I hold to. In my life we'll always go on.

Near, far, wherever you are, I believe that the heart does go on.

=chorus= (why does the heart go on)

Once more, you open the door And you're here in my heart, And my heart will go on and on.

You're here, there's nothing to fear, And I know that my heart will go on.

We'll stay forever this way. You are safe in my heart, And my heart will go on and on.

On and on....on and on~~~

=insert chest-thumping crescendo here=


7 posted on 07/05/2003 3:36:06 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Hmmmm? My unemployment runs out in January, 2004 - but I heard about a great job lead yesterday - and I will be there first thing Monday morning. It would be a great job - right next door to where I live. NO drive time - WhooHooo!
8 posted on 07/05/2003 3:37:31 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamKeck
Gosh. When employers get wind of this next crisis coming right on top of the workman's compensation insurance crisis, and then add all that in to the proposal to raise taxes on commerical/industrial properties by abrogating parts of Prop 13, especially after the horrific raise in power rates has already forced a lot of small businesses to close down and the trippling of the state automobile tax and that proposal to raise the state sales tax from 7.5% to 8.5% ... well, things ain't gonna be real pretty by the time that recall election rolls around.
9 posted on 07/05/2003 3:44:30 PM PDT by SamKeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SamKeck
I would imagine that list would fuel quite a change in the status quo. Unfortunately, death and taxes are always with us.

California had a strong manufacturing base - its tax base is still robust. It takes time to move an organization out of state.

As the bureaucrats keep racheting up the pain. business owners will see more and more need to evacuate the left coast.

So where will they be going? Idaho?

10 posted on 07/05/2003 3:53:54 PM PDT by Podkayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
The democrat party is a criminal enterprise. Those stupid enough to support it will ultimately pay a steep price.
11 posted on 07/05/2003 4:01:22 PM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Podkayne
So where will they be going? Idaho?

That's where San Diego-based BUck Knives went. I know that the neighboring states of Arizona, Utah, and Nevada are poaching businesses as well.


12 posted on 07/05/2003 4:03:45 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Needless to say I feel sorry for California.

The good counties really should just try to brake off and form their own state.
13 posted on 07/05/2003 4:09:34 PM PDT by Impy (Dear Justice O'Connor, If you want to see your cat alive again.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Among the obvious, she said, would be borrowing from a federal fund set up specifically to help states bridge shortfalls in their unemployment insurance programs, a path already taken during this economic downturn by Texas, New York, Minnesota, Missouri, Illinois and North Carolina.

Texas, NY, Minnesota, Missouri, Illinois, and North Carolina?

Hummm, I had no idea those states were *already* doing this.....

14 posted on 07/05/2003 4:10:02 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
OK<<<<

ROFL!!!!
15 posted on 07/05/2003 4:53:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
I really don't mind 26 weeks of unemployment benefits. That's what most states have.

I do mind that about $7 BILLION is going to support the illegal immigrants in California. If the liberals want to continue to 'take care of' everyone who is 'needy', then the're gonna keep sinking. It's called 'control your spending' people.

But........ just deporting those in this country illegaly, those using up our Social Security monies, free health care, education, etc......... well, that'll take care of the particular issue in this article. Then they only have to figure out how the Hollywood elite will donate and raise funds to cover the other $30 BILLION the state is suffering from.

Somehow, I can't feel too sorry for California.
16 posted on 07/05/2003 5:20:35 PM PDT by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bart99
Please remember that the people of California passed a state proposition, prop. 187 that specifically addressed the issue of benefits for illegals. Said proposition was then shot down by a federal judge who deemed it "unconstitutional".
17 posted on 07/05/2003 5:26:05 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Good luck.
18 posted on 07/05/2003 6:26:16 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Thanks!
19 posted on 07/05/2003 7:35:04 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson