Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dasein64
"right-thinking Supreme [appointments]

DOn't count on it. Dick Viguerie, who was 100% correct about Reagan's disastrous nomination of "Sodomy Sadie" O'Connor, has also predicted that Bush's first Supreme nomination will be just as bad.

Please see the NewsMax site of last Thursday or Friday...

167 posted on 07/20/2003 10:40:37 AM PDT by ninenot (Torquemada: Due for Revival Soon!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: ninenot
Predicting the Republicans will make poor Federal judgeship nominations
is like predicting the Democrats will engage in lies and demagoguery.

And yet, even Bush 1 got us Thomas, and Reagan did give us Scalia. if Bork wasnt borked, Reagan would have looked even better, with only Oconnor being the wobbly one. not 100%, but we got conservative appointments. ...
we got breyer and Ginsburg out of Clinton, horrible liberals through and through. one more Clinton appointee and we'd have a USSC much like Canada's and European courts. gack.

Again and again we see that with "conservative" Presidents we get much less than 100% of what we hope for.
With Democrat Presidents we get close to 0% of what we want, and close to 100% of what we fear.


226 posted on 07/20/2003 12:41:25 PM PDT by WOSG (We liberated Iraq. Now Let's Free Cuba, North Korea, Iran, China, Tibet, Syria, ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson