[RobFromGa]

bump for truth

[gcruse]

The WSJ 'refuses' to run most letters to the editor.
Newspapers are like that.

[gunnedah]

Typical ploy of the Democrats today,when they are wrong they cover it up with lies and never admit the truth regardless of the facts. What makes them so much more powerful is that the so called "Mainstream Media" ignores the truth and helps perpetuate their lies and agenda. They always look subjectively at a situation and it only matters what they preceive and the truth never matters. Sad also is as long as they can keep a certain element of the population uneducated and not able to investigate for themselves they have at least 25% of the nation in their corner to start with following like sheep, then they spend an enormous amount of their time and our tax dollars attacking the truth and manipulating it.

[shrinkermd]

There is something about Coulter's appearance and presentation that always puts me off. To corrorborate my feelings and give them credence, I read Treason.

While the book is entertaining and, even hilarious, in parts, it is more of a history book than a political screed. I am old enough to havee met the Senator and recall the intense, hostile press he faced. Coutler's book is a masterpiece of inductive reasoning salted with spicey writing. When I went to college it would be called "Modern Civ."

I am grateful for her careful attention to detain and the very readible and followable endnotes. A good job no matter what you think about her!

PS: People who challenge and correct mistaken conventional wisdom are never appreciated --they are usually burned at figurative stake called public opinion.

[George W. Bush]

Coulter's book has a pretty obvious bias. And it probably should.

She has stimulated a re-examination of the era and all the lies the Left and libmedia like to spin about it.

Besides, Ms. Coulter has infuriated all the right people. That deserves some applause in itself.

[inkling]

It gets a little tiresome to hear Ann declare victimhood every time a conservative disagrees with her. I'm expecting her next book to be titled "TREASON!: Why Everyone in the Nation is a Traitor But Me."

And seeing as how the WSJ probably gets thousands of letters a day, I'm not scandalized that they "refused" to publish this letter. It's not a Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy... it's called limited space.

Let's leave the victim card to the libs. Ann's a big girl; she should be able to handle different opinions.

[seenenuf]

Being a big fan and follower of Dorothy Rabinowitzs'
writing in the WSJ (especially her long and tedious work on the persecution of the accused in the McMartin child abuse case), I was shocked to read her column on Coulter and also wrote a letter to the editor. I wanted to point out that it was appearant that Rabinowitz was writing about Ann's book, without looking at her extensive footnotes/index. I think because of Rabinowitzs' age, she probably had a front seat and being young was swept up with the group think and her urbane buddys.
Dorothy Rabinowitzs is a respected talented lady, who goofed up this time.

[RaceBannon]

...

...

[IncPen]

ping

[hosepipe]

Coulter is a RINO exposeing machine.....
Due to her detail in working out her books and her footnotes. Her ideas can be easily researched. PC cowardice HATES THAT... They hate it SO much that it exposes them (to me). Since the entire democrat party is a lie and many/some republicans are really un-registered democrats Ann Coulters books tip over the chess board and say let a real dialog begin. The time for playing political games with TRAITORS has ended.. And its about damn time someone did that..

Buckley and others in their books were pretty much ignored. Ann CoulterStein is uniquely positioned (for some reason) to say again "Are you a communist/ socialist/ liberal/ Progressive/ Fellow traveler/ democracy espouser or any other kind of TRAITOR to the American Constitution, AND when did you become one"....
(McCarthy is ALIVE again, ITS ALIVE, ITS ALIVE) lol...

[Tailgunner Joe]

bump

[Stultis]

Resource Thread:

Tailgunner Joe--Where Have You Gone, Joe McCarthy?

[DoctorMichael]

........Anyway, that’s already being handled by The New York Times. Faithful readers of your pages expect something better from the Journal.

Hahahahahahahaha.

Alright, Stanton! Way to stick the knife in and turn it!

[Eva]

This should have been posted on the internet, but you have to do it immediately when you read the article, or it will be too late. I unfortunately failed to respond the night I read it because I was too tired to make sense. I did send my letter anyway, with the hope that Rabinowitz would at least read the responses.

Her article was about her worst written article that I have read. Her whole premise was a non sequitur, especially the part about Hollywood and the last dig about McCarthy supporting the Nazis was totally off base. She obviously wrote the article without doing ANY research.

[Map Kernow]

"The Wall Street Journal...National Review...That's the OLD Right...."
----With apologies to Sec'y. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld

[<1/1,000,000th%]

When Mrs. Moss appeared before him in March of 1954, she denied she was a communist, indicated she had never heard of Marx, and allowed that she was being confused with some other Annie Lee Moss who must have been the guilty party. This mistaken-identity theme was echoed by the Democrats on the panel, and has been repeated often since.

"I do not recall being a communist".

[Maigrey]

morning read

[Ann Archy]

I doubt that Annie Lee Moss is Jewish, so why else would an educated person like Dorohy Rabinowitz cover for her?