Posted on 07/29/2003 11:03:15 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
A new USA Today /CNN /Gallup Survey suggests there is a backlash of public opinion against homosexuality after the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Texas' sodomy law.
It's not surprising.
The decision was widely seen as a judicial push for the agenda of homosexual political activists eager to see their lifestyle not only accepted nationwide but promoted by government and major cultural institutions.
Defenders of the Texas law had contended the ultimate goal of the case was not to end sodomy laws, but to advance the "ambitious agenda" of homosexual activists. Justice Antonin Scalia, in a scathing dissent, agreed.
"The court has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda," he wrote.
The public seems to agree as well.
Asked whether same-sex relations between consenting adults should be legal, 48 percent in the new survey said yes, while 46 percent said no.
Prior to the ruling in early May, the ratio peaked at 60 percent in favor, 35 percent opposed. In other words, the ruling may have had just the opposite of its intended effect.
According to the numbers, 49 percent of respondents said homosexuality should not be considered "an acceptable alternative lifestyle," while 46 percent said it should. This marks the first time since 1997 that more people were opposed.
Opposition to civil unions has also risen, according to the poll, even amid recent developments promoting them. WorldNetDaily reported the New York Times recently decided to publish notices of same-sex ceremonies along with its wedding announcements, and the September-October issue of Conde Nast's Bride's magazine currently on newsstands features an article on homosexual weddings.
Fifty-seven percent polled said they opposed civil unions – the most opposition since the question was first asked in 2000 – while 40 percent voiced support.
Recently the Canadian courts decided to recognize homosexual marriages. The California state Assembly's passage of a historic bill that would award virtually all the rights of marriage to homosexual "domestic partners."
Is public opinion still important when the courts are taking the matter out of the hands of the people? You bet it is. In fact, the majority opinion in the historic Supreme Court decision in the Texas case even cited growing public acceptance of homosexuality as a basis of its ruling.
Likewise, on my new radio show this week, I interviewed a spokeswoman for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation who said morality is simply a matter for the public to decide through politics.
Asked why polygamists are still getting a tough battle in the courts, she said it is simply because there are not enough polygamists and they are not sufficiently organized to make their case.
She's right. And just as Scalia predicted in his dissent, you can bank on polygamists organizing around the same legal language employed by the homosexual activists. You can bank on incest practitioners organizing along these lines. You can bank on those who want to see reductions in the age of consent organizing along these lines. You can even bank on those who are into bestiality organizing along these lines.
It's coming. That's the future. Just watch the news.
That's how America decides what is right and wrong today – based on public-opinion polls and the clout of narrow, special-interest groups.
The truth is, there is little difference in my eyes between polygamy and homosexuality – except perhaps that there are far more biblical injunctions against homosexuality and in far stronger terms and without any exceptions.
It was once true in America that our laws were based on such things as the Ten Commandments and biblical law. That is no longer the case. Today, it is simply based on which way the wind is blowing. And the wind is to the backs of the homosexual /transsexual /cross-gendered lobby.
Why? Are there no eternal truths anymore? Is there no right and wrong? Is it all just a question of pop-culture whim?
Today, homosexuals not only are a protected class of people based on their sexual behavior, they are a celebrated group of people on television, in movies, in books and in the media. They are portrayed as heroes, quite literally. And what places them in that category is what they do in their bedrooms – and sometimes in public restrooms.
Backlash?
My guess is we ain't seen nothing yet.
Yeah, how unfair. It should have just stayed a homosexual bashing thread. Boo hoo.
The silence of the sacrificial lambs of the radical Queer agenda.. won't be long before they'll catch something that will silence them forever.. what a waste of a promising life.. :(
I'm sure that you can find a nice thread to show your religious intolerance on elsewhere on FR.
Parades, tv shows, a segregated public school...
I guess that it was easier for some people to accept this behavior as long as homosexuals would be quiet about their bedroom (and public park) proclivities.
Maybe we could get the media to saturate coverage of abortions, graphicly showing the victorious woman's fetal tissue. Let people know what it is that they are supporting when they support the abortion agenda too.
Not really, the Quinnipiac poll found 58% think other otherwise.
One of the lies that homo-activists keep saying - and this includes their supporters, since actual homosexuals are only about 2% of the population - is that anyone who disagrees with them is a "hater". Many of those who are fighting the "gay agenda" are the most compassionate people around. Scott Lively, who is using his life to defend the natural family against the onslaught, took into his home a homosexual who was dying of AIDS and cared for him. The man renounced his same sex acts, and was greatly helped by this good man.
Another lie of the homonazis is that they want to be left alone. The truth is they don't want to leave us and our kids alone. The want their queer sexual agenda to be everywhere. If it was kept private who would know or care?
Doublespeak: to tell the truth about the miserable consequences of same sex acts, and to shine the light of truth on the "gay agenda" is called "homosexual bashing". So it's kinder to let people kill themselves and others, and let comfused adolescents be recruited and seduced into death and disease. Right.
The next step is Thought Police. In the UK it is AGAINST THE LAW to use the word "homosexual" in public because it sounds too negative. "Gay" is the legally acceptable term for sodomy practioners.
Well, Emmy Lou, you and you homosexual friends should keep your frigging sex life private. The whole Texas case was a setup, the man who called in about a disturbance was another homosexual who lived in the same apartment, he lied about the disturbance to get the cops to come and catch the other two performing sodomy, they left the door either open or unlocked on purpose. In fact they had tried the scam several times before but the cops didn't see the sodomy. The whole thing was an act to get the case to go to court.
I am fed up with you guys shoving your illness and bad choices in my face and in the face of everyone else. You want to be a homosexual? Fine. Just leave the rest of us in peace. But that's not what you want. You know what "After the Ball" says.
(Scripter - can you put your link to the summary here? TNX!)
That's nonsensical. You're born gay. There are homosexual animals. They weren't recruited.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.