Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pushy homosexuality: Joseph Farah on growing backlash of public opinion against sodomy
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, July 30, 2003 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 07/29/2003 11:03:15 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: weegee
Well this thread didn't take 3 posts before the religion bashing started. Ho hum...

Yeah, how unfair. It should have just stayed a homosexual bashing thread. Boo hoo.

41 posted on 07/30/2003 8:36:40 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It's not a matter of anybody being in "anybodie's" bedroom

Its about recruiting in grade, Jr High, High Schools and Colleges

its about filling the airwaves with smut-garbage TV shows and movie stars
who sell the Sodomite agenda like they do Soda Pop and overpriced tennis shoes

Its about the destruction of America by tearing out its Christian base ..The Family

The sodomite agenda along with many "liberal" (libertine) agendas will do just that-destroy America

America cannot stand without its mandate from God ...He will not support those who return us to paganism of the self..humanism..sexual immorality...once we have gotten to the point where we no longer chose to discriminate between good and evil ..we are toast..dry toast

Eventually once all the anti taditional agendas are realized the threat of anarchy will be enough to martial the very forces that use & promote anarchy to impose a dictatorship..

When the peasants are found to be unable to rule themselves...they will of course need to be ruled-
The peasants will have been shown to not be worthy of self rule and will give up their liberty for security..
This is what the elites have been waiting for ...the failure of the grand American experiment..
(The elites of course ignore/deny their own vile paganism)

Our freedom worked..once upon a time because we were a moral people..who were able to bridal our own passions...self control- spirit over flesh- was once considered a virtue..it is now considered a mental dissorder...
42 posted on 07/30/2003 8:48:37 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pram
think that if they can get everyone to go along with them the voice will go silent.

The silence of the sacrificial lambs of the radical Queer agenda.. won't be long before they'll catch something that will silence them forever.. what a waste of a promising life.. :(

43 posted on 07/30/2003 9:13:24 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: jlogajan
The topic of this thread was about the backlash against homosexuality being shoved in everyones' face.

I'm sure that you can find a nice thread to show your religious intolerance on elsewhere on FR.

46 posted on 07/30/2003 10:37:58 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Sure is a very public thing (especially in the media) for something that is reportedly a "private" act.

Parades, tv shows, a segregated public school...

I guess that it was easier for some people to accept this behavior as long as homosexuals would be quiet about their bedroom (and public park) proclivities.

Maybe we could get the media to saturate coverage of abortions, graphicly showing the victorious woman's fetal tissue. Let people know what it is that they are supporting when they support the abortion agenda too.

47 posted on 07/30/2003 10:54:13 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
If we homophobes f*ked in public, would the heterophobes throw a hissy fit? If sexual identity in public is sauce for the gander, it ought to be sauce for the goose as well!
48 posted on 07/30/2003 10:58:18 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
In reality, most people don't care that much about the subject.

Not really, the Quinnipiac poll found 58% think other otherwise.

49 posted on 07/30/2003 11:06:04 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: jazzlite
And, I want to say that this is not about those homosexuals who are good people, living decent lives. \

One of the lies that homo-activists keep saying - and this includes their supporters, since actual homosexuals are only about 2% of the population - is that anyone who disagrees with them is a "hater". Many of those who are fighting the "gay agenda" are the most compassionate people around. Scott Lively, who is using his life to defend the natural family against the onslaught, took into his home a homosexual who was dying of AIDS and cared for him. The man renounced his same sex acts, and was greatly helped by this good man.

Another lie of the homonazis is that they want to be left alone. The truth is they don't want to leave us and our kids alone. The want their queer sexual agenda to be everywhere. If it was kept private who would know or care?

51 posted on 07/30/2003 11:25:32 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
It should have just stayed a homosexual bashing thread.

Doublespeak: to tell the truth about the miserable consequences of same sex acts, and to shine the light of truth on the "gay agenda" is called "homosexual bashing". So it's kinder to let people kill themselves and others, and let comfused adolescents be recruited and seduced into death and disease. Right.

The next step is Thought Police. In the UK it is AGAINST THE LAW to use the word "homosexual" in public because it sounds too negative. "Gay" is the legally acceptable term for sodomy practioners.

52 posted on 07/30/2003 11:32:54 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Or in other words:

"Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites--in proportion as their love of justice is above their rapacity;--in proportion as their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumption;--in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon the will and appetite is placed somewhere: and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters."
-- Edmund Burke

53 posted on 07/30/2003 11:36:52 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Emmylou; scripter
Frankly, I don't need the state to meddle in my sex life.

Well, Emmy Lou, you and you homosexual friends should keep your frigging sex life private. The whole Texas case was a setup, the man who called in about a disturbance was another homosexual who lived in the same apartment, he lied about the disturbance to get the cops to come and catch the other two performing sodomy, they left the door either open or unlocked on purpose. In fact they had tried the scam several times before but the cops didn't see the sodomy. The whole thing was an act to get the case to go to court.

I am fed up with you guys shoving your illness and bad choices in my face and in the face of everyone else. You want to be a homosexual? Fine. Just leave the rest of us in peace. But that's not what you want. You know what "After the Ball" says.

(Scripter - can you put your link to the summary here? TNX!)

54 posted on 07/30/2003 11:43:53 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Emmylou
If you don't like being unpopular go get reparative therapy.
56 posted on 07/30/2003 12:03:28 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: pram
The whole thing is very simple. If they didn’t recruit, homosexuality would die off.
58 posted on 07/30/2003 12:24:39 PM PDT by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: tractorman
The whole thing is very simple. If they didn’t recruit, homosexuality would die off.

That's nonsensical. You're born gay. There are homosexual animals. They weren't recruited.

60 posted on 07/30/2003 12:39:14 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson