Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pink Triangle Wedge? (gay marriage to split black votes from dems)
Fraters Liberatas ^ | 7/5/2003 | The Elder

Posted on 08/06/2003 7:25:52 AM PDT by visagoth

Tuesday, August 05, 2003


The Pink Triangle Wedge?

In the 2000 election only 10% of African-American voters pulled the lever (or punched the chad) for Bush. Obviously these are dismal numbers which the Bush team would certainly love to improve upon come 2004.

The recent brouhaha over gay marriage may be the issue they use to try to chip away at what has become a Democratic stranglehold on the black vote. A Gallup Poll conducted on July 25-27 shows that support for legalized homosexual relations among blacks has dropped to 35%. While most African-Americans have embraced the broad positions of the Democratic party, when it comes to social issues they are often more conservative. In particular they aren't too crazy about being allied with the very outspoken gay rights movement and its leaders.

Will this one issue be enough to get large numbers of black voters to cross over and vote for Bush in 2004? Probably not. But even if only a small percentage do it will weaken the base of core support for the eventual Democratic candidate, and whoever that turns out to be will very likely be unable to afford any slippage if he hopes to have a chance to upset Bush.

Look for the Republicans to try to get as much play out of gay marriage for as long as they can.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; africanamericans; blackvote; democrats; dems; gay; homosexualagenda; marriage; pink; triangle; wedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Tokhtamish
Nevertheless, blacks voted en masse for Reagan in '80 and to a lesser degree, in '84. Something must have been working.
21 posted on 08/06/2003 8:33:33 AM PDT by =Intervention= (White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tokhtamish; mhking
I agree that the distrust runs very, very deep. I was being interviewed on an African-American radio station in Detroit this morning (by which I mean the hosts were black, ads aimed at black viewers. I don't know the ownership). I was talking about professors' political affiliations -- registered Republicans vs. registered Democrats at a variety of different schools. One of the hosts kept belaboring the point that being a Democrat was not the same as being liberal. True, says I, but you can find out voter registration, and it's a proxy for ideology. We went back and forth on this, until it finally occurred to me, oh yeah, this is an African American in Detroit. 99% of the people he knows vote Democratic -- and that probably includes everyone from the minister who raves against gay marriage to the avowed Marxist in the teachers union local. So he couldn't see "Democrat" as being an ideology -- it's just a state of affairs, an unquestioned assumption that means nothing about your politics. Republicans are simply The Other, not something anyone you know meddles with. Many blacks see opposition to affirmative action as a code word for racism. The host kept telling me that Republicans and conservatives liked the values of the 1950's, and that included Jim Crow. So when they oppose affirmative action now, they're really saying that they'd prefer there not be blacks in "their" universities.
So what can one do? I don't know. Distrust is deep, and I hope it changes, but I'm not sure how. Urban blacks especially seem to prefer to hash out ideological issues in the Democratic primary elections, not in a Republican vs. Democratic contest. So pointing out that many African Americans share Republican values on many social issues won't change that.
22 posted on 08/06/2003 8:34:22 AM PDT by laurav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kdf1
I agree wholeheartedly. 'Gay' is a good word that should not be used for the queer part of this nation.
23 posted on 08/06/2003 8:34:51 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
The Matrix is nothing more than refried Marxism. My point remains.
24 posted on 08/06/2003 8:35:28 AM PDT by =Intervention= (White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
The Matrix? Never saw it.

I was referencing Brave New World by Aldous Huxley; you might be able to secure the Cliff Notes.

Turn off your freakin' tv.
25 posted on 08/06/2003 8:40:29 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Are you under the impression that all blacks live in corrupt urban districts?
26 posted on 08/06/2003 8:45:36 AM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Whatever the merits to your claim, the so-called 'black vote' is fixed and its nonsense to pretend otherwise. So long as urban welfare districts continue to vote 102% for the Ds with no Republican reaction, there is no point in speaking seriously about a shift in voting patterns.

This is only partially true, because the assumption here is that the "black vote" is restricted to those urban welfare districts. This is false. There is a growing black middle class and they have moved massively to the suburbs. They are the primary target for weaning away from the DemonRats.

27 posted on 08/06/2003 8:50:55 AM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
No.

This is actually a fairly simple point.

In 2000 black voted something like 92% D. That tells me that suburban blacks probably voted something like 55-45 maybe? Making headway in this number may have some meaning, but its much too small a demographic to have any real intellectual or political meaning.

Urban districts, that make up the so called "black vote," are hotbeds of corruption.

All folks are registered to vote and whether they show up or not on election day, you can bet they cast a D vote. If inner-city districts had the same kind of voter turn out experienced in other demographics (say 60%) the numbers would be more reasonable.

28 posted on 08/06/2003 8:52:05 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
I agree completely, and even challenge that there is something called the 'black vote' since as a satistical category its completely bogus.

Not only a growing black middle class but also the eventual recognition that their fates are tied to the fate of the white middle class as unrestrained immigration continues to threaten their value to the workplace.
29 posted on 08/06/2003 8:54:51 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
This may very well be true. I can't think of any group in society other than the KKK that likes homosexuals less than the average African American Male.

You are correct. The contempt for homosexuality within the black community is so strong that many gay black men have to live their life on the "down-low" meaning that they stay deep in the closet, often marrying women and fathering children.

Unfortunately, being a gay black man "down low" has led to a rise in HIV-AIDS among heterosexual black women who became infected from the husbands and lovers that they did not know were gay.

30 posted on 08/06/2003 8:59:32 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
"Nevertheless, blacks voted en masse for Reagan in '80 and to a lesser degree, in '84. Something must have been working."


I hope you're being sarcastic. Reagan never got as much as 25% of the black vote.
31 posted on 08/06/2003 8:59:36 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
You are absolutely right. The plantation owners aren't going to turn their slaves loose.
32 posted on 08/06/2003 9:04:42 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The last election was pretty tight. A part of a % point here or there can make a huge difference in many races.

My projections for the republican column based the demorat choise of election year topics:

Democrats- Gays can become priests & get married - maybe a plus for 2% vote for replublicans between Blacks Hispanics and whites.

Democrats- we are going to take back your tax refund - Add 1% vote from all groups to the repubs.

Democrats- Yellowcake,WMD, constant barrage of negative attacks on the wrong issues will come back to bite them in the butt.- WMD case will be made and they will get Saddam. Add 2 % more to the republicans for democrat hysteria and suicidal lurch to the far left.

Republicans win election +5% national vote

I am Hopefull that the hardcore Demcrats will continue on their present path. Their current talking point assasination agenda could have been written for them by Carl rove they attack the stong proints and ignore the weak ones. Instead they should be hitting on high emotional subjects like the job outsourcing. If the recovery is not up to par all bets are off, that trumps all other issues

33 posted on 08/06/2003 9:11:38 AM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
That's a scary thought. It's really hard to know somebody completely...
34 posted on 08/06/2003 9:12:06 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("If you think no one cares about you, try skipping next month's car payment" - Daily Zen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: underbyte
I hope you are right. THat big a swing could give the GOP a 60 member Senate population. That makes Frist at least as powerful a man as the president.
35 posted on 08/06/2003 9:15:01 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("If you think no one cares about you, try skipping next month's car payment" - Daily Zen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
When Reagan eliminated Tax deductions for credit cards and car payments the blacks felt cheated and hence lends creditbility to the Liberal mantra "tax cuts for the wealthy" Middle class blacks have not forgotten that one.

36 posted on 08/06/2003 9:18:29 AM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Wonder why that didn't work in 2002.
37 posted on 08/06/2003 9:26:46 AM PDT by tru_degenerate ('I have not always been right, but I have always been sincere.' - WEB Du Bois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
D#$mn
38 posted on 08/06/2003 9:30:33 AM PDT by tru_degenerate ('I have not always been right, but I have always been sincere.' - WEB Du Bois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tru_degenerate
Umm...2002 was not a Presidential election.

Not sure I understand your point.
39 posted on 08/06/2003 9:36:13 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: visagoth
Hey I use to use your nickname years ago (in 98 and 99 i think) to chat on efnet and talkcity when I didn't want to be recognized.
40 posted on 08/06/2003 9:51:50 AM PDT by honeygrl (I reserve the right to take any statement and copy it out of context.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson