1 posted on
08/06/2003 9:48:34 AM PDT by
sdk7x7
To: sdk7x7
Wow, I wonder how that happened. lol
To: sdk7x7
Good work, hackers.
Now the site owners need to be prosecuted for wire fraud.
3 posted on
08/06/2003 9:50:16 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: *bang_list
4 posted on
08/06/2003 9:52:36 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
("A 'free man' is a man who wants to be free." -- Chinese proverb)
To: sdk7x7
I just looked at the site and the owner is whining about HIS first amendment rights being violated. This guy intentionally assumes another man's identity for the purpose of fraud and deceit and cries about HIS rights. He attempts to subvert the second amendment and cries about violation of the first.
Normally I don't support hackers, but in this case I think the guy deserves a medal.
5 posted on
08/06/2003 9:54:06 AM PDT by
mbynack
To: sdk7x7; All
Good for the conservatitve hackers.
Now it is time for legal action in criminal and civil courts.
6 posted on
08/06/2003 9:55:37 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end," said Uday)
To: sdk7x7
Normally I don't go to these sites because it really gets my blood boiling. But - I followed the link for "More Guns More Crime" and found the following:
From 1996 to 2000, Texas concealed handgun license holders were arrested for weapon-related offenses at a rate 81 percent higher than that of the general population of Texas, aged 21 and older.1
In the first six months of 1997, the weapon-related offense arrest rate among Texas concealed handgun license holders was more than twice as high as that of the general population of Texas aged 21 years and older.
Of course the source for this is the Brady bunch site. Does anyone have evidence to refute this?
11 posted on
08/06/2003 10:04:15 AM PDT by
mbynack
To: sdk7x7
To: sdk7x7
Posted on 08/05/2003 8:52 AM PDT by pabianice
And by the next day it was hacked. I love it. Congrats to the techie who hacked it.
To: sdk7x7
Bwaaa....ha ha ha haaaaa.....hack em again
18 posted on
08/06/2003 10:27:32 AM PDT by
Mat_Helm
To: sdk7x7
I nornally wouldn't support hackers, but internet vigilanteism was needed here. First, the ISP should have pulled the web site when Lott contacted them, but they wouldn't even tell him who ran the site. Secondly, the owner probably doesn't even have a legal right to the name. Courts have already ruled(wrongly in many cases I would argue, but none the less, have ruled) that the person who has the name owns teh right to a web domain with that name. For instance, a court made a family, who had reserved the name www.britney.com for their young daughter, to give it to Britney Spears' record label. They were compensated, but they did rule Spears had the right to that domain name. There have been others as well.
To: sdk7x7
22 posted on
08/06/2003 10:59:21 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: sdk7x7
we at AskJohnLott.org can understand why pro-gun extremists would be afraid of free speech
Total BS! Pro-gun sites almost always allow some sort of feedback, but you will be hard pressed to find an email address or message board on an anti-gun site. When you are wrong, it gets difficult when people are allowed to question you.
25 posted on
08/06/2003 11:36:27 AM PDT by
itzmygun
(Things getting too serious? Visit www.wackoemailer.com.)
To: sdk7x7
They refute their entire purpose in their msg on the site... they recognize the fact that pro-gun people "value the 2nd Amendment." Apparently they don't...
26 posted on
08/06/2003 11:40:11 AM PDT by
sdk7x7
(AMERICA, LET'S ROLL!)
To: sdk7x7
Wow. Whatta f---in' tragedy.
C'mon, let's go look, laugh and point.
-Jay
29 posted on
08/06/2003 11:58:38 AM PDT by
Jay D. Dyson
(Better a Bushbot than a Bubbabot!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson