Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Episcopalians Still a Church? A Lutheran theologian/journalist examines Robinson confirmation
Christianity Today ^ | 8/7/03 | Uwe Siemon-Netto

Posted on 08/07/2003 5:49:25 PM PDT by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Capriole
Fred Barnes attends a dissenting Anglican church in the DC area. I read that some time ago. Of course, it might be out in Virginia somewhere...I don't know where it is. There are some web sites that list alternatives to the Episcopals.
41 posted on 08/07/2003 8:53:52 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rhema
The entire sad episode reminds me of the communists gloating about how easy it was to take over the Presbyterian seminaries in the '60s.

Their blatant disregard of Biblical authority only increased continuously after that. I had to leave them because of it.

It looks like the Edwardian Granite Heap is going through the same death throes.

42 posted on 08/07/2003 9:27:11 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tiger_eye
The Episcopal Church lost it when they refused to discipline (or excommunicate) Bishop Spong for denying the divinity of Christ. The rest has been a slow descent into madness.
43 posted on 08/07/2003 9:30:36 PM PDT by keilimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Capriole
Try this link. The American Anglican Council

They are headquartered in DC, so it stands to reason that there must be a local Anglican place of worship.

44 posted on 08/07/2003 9:30:52 PM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; livius; ...
Ping.
45 posted on 08/07/2003 9:32:58 PM PDT by narses ("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Carindal Arinze of Nigeria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Perhaps a cash cow - our Parish had to buy back it's own property when it split from the ECUSA in 1976. There will be conservative Parishes that will pay the ECUSA to keep the property they already own - I think you can properly call it legalized extorsion.
46 posted on 08/07/2003 9:33:15 PM PDT by keilimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Capriole
There was a conservative Episcopal church in Akkokeek Maryland, but they've been forced by the Bishop of DC to be more PC, when the leftists of DC, with Bishop Dixon at the fore, utilized the US courts to oust the pastor chosen by the congregation, in a nasty battle a year or two ago...

the infowarrior

47 posted on 08/07/2003 9:35:48 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Just say you are a "Conservative Anglican", instead.

(Maybe we can sue the ECUSA for "defamation of character" or "violation of a contract". I feel defamed and violated.)
48 posted on 08/07/2003 9:40:24 PM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: keilimon
I suspect that the Anglican World Communion could make a valid case in court stating that they have equal rights to the property of the ECUSA. A judge might force a settlement between the two.
49 posted on 08/07/2003 9:42:35 PM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rhema
We have been fore warned many places in scriptures, such as Proverbs 7 and Jude about the orgainzed churches in the last days becoming apostate. These people are "pre-ordained" for this condemnation, Jude. They are having a high old time now, but it will be short lived. Eternity lasts a very long time.

Come out of her my people lest ye be partakers of her iniquities and receive of her punishments. It's time for the tuff to get going, we are in the last days and should draw ever closer to God in order to endure. Something wicked this way comes.
50 posted on 08/07/2003 9:44:53 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief; Coleus; firebrand; DPB101
You are right in the ballpark as to what I've been trying to rally!

Forgive my rant, but:

Al Qaeda was the organization that empowered all the smaller jihad cells. From newer research, Al Qaeda my be a communist tail wagging...But anyway, the point is:

It provided a centralization for intelligence, financing and supplies. Yet the cells were able to function independently too.

"Since the enemy of my enemy is also my friend", you really could say all these radical leftist organizations that have infiltrated our schools (NEA), left wing grass roots movements (ie., MoveOn), antiwar protestors, right to choose, and even the environmental groups are part of Al Qaeda, or a higher communist organization as recently researched with www.cpusa.org . You follow the money and infiltration up far enough, it leads back to the infiltrators that have come at us from all sides.

The right wing movement isn't as strong as we need it to be. We are all functioning independently of each other. The resources we have are far superior; but weak since we are divided. If there was a way we could pull together and function more on the lines of Al Qaeda, we could stop this left/dem/commie infiltration in its tracks.

What was the strength of Rome? The warriors would copy their enemies fighting tactics and win.

So, let's sue...let's organize. Let's funnel our money better! Or we can sit back and just passively bitch to each other on FR.
51 posted on 08/07/2003 9:45:58 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Sure, they are still a church. They are just not long a Christian one!
52 posted on 08/07/2003 9:47:34 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Agreed.

They are a church but not a Christian Church.

How can this Bishop help someone struggling with the sin of homosexuality?

Will a Drunkard Bishop be next?

Or a adulterer Bishop?

This Bishop defines himself by his sin rather than his virtue or faith.
53 posted on 08/07/2003 10:01:33 PM PDT by Kay Soze (Free Republic- a gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism & even some Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior
Thanks, I followed this sad story closely while it took place. It was hard to believe that the Lord would permit this great injustice at the hands of the suffragan bishop of Washington.
54 posted on 08/07/2003 10:11:18 PM PDT by Capriole (Foi vainquera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I've been working on copying one of their favorite tactics: labeling people.

We say "queer is immoral"; they label us 'homophobes'.
We say control illegal immigration; they label us 'zenophobes'.

So in response:

When they say "Christianity is too judgemental"; I'll label them 'Lost souls'.
When they say "Gay is the only way"; I'll call them 'heterophobes' or 'antifamilial'.
When they say "Government control is good"; I'll label them 'elitists'.
When they ridicule the premise that a free republic is the best form of government, I'll refer to them as 'anticonstitutional' or call them 'suppressionists'.

The above is an example of copying one of their tactics. The funny thing is, I can do it, but it doesn't feel like I'm doing the right thing, somehow.


55 posted on 08/07/2003 10:17:18 PM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
One can only hope, but there are court precedents that favor the ECUSA position. Strange, in that the ECUSA did not use it's money to build or maintain the Parish.
56 posted on 08/07/2003 10:50:02 PM PDT by keilimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I was going to ping you. As I replied to your thesis yesterday, the Episcopal Church Members in Redding found out the hard way who owns the local churches. It ain't the locals. The Bishop and his board the Diocese owns the buildings and the land not the lay members who raised and donated the money to buy the land and build the churches.
57 posted on 08/07/2003 11:52:13 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end," said Uday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You know you shouldn't stand in the way of "progress."
58 posted on 08/08/2003 2:56:30 AM PDT by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The question I have is...Why remain in this church? This is a serious question from a Catholic. Why try to salvage it? Do you folks believe that your Church was founded by Christ Himself as we do? If not, why not join a Lutheran or other protestant church? This is not a polemical question.
59 posted on 08/08/2003 3:34:09 AM PDT by sydney smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sydney smith
Why remain in this church?

The simple facts: The worldwide Anglican Communion has close to 70 million members (and growing). The Episcopal Church has only 2.3 million members (and shrinking). They comprise less than 4% of the total--but if you asked them, they think they are The Church.

This tiny faction of the Anglican Communion, the Episcopal Church, is no longer in the business of saving souls, BUT the Anglican community is a major force in worldwide mission and ministry. Dismantling the entire network-of-salvation because of an errant few would be, well, Satan's dream-come-true.

60 posted on 08/08/2003 5:11:07 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson