Skip to comments.
Dig Site Bringing To Light Artifacts As Old As 7,000 Years (SW Pennsylvania)
Tribune Review ^
| 8-10-2003
| Mark Berton
Posted on 08/10/2003 6:23:57 PM PDT by blam
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:03:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: First_Salute; pram
Read some of the articles from
this site.
21
posted on
08/10/2003 11:34:33 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Davis said the time period fits the time that the Adena Indians were prevalent in the region. In other words, it's an Early Woodland period site.
22
posted on
08/10/2003 11:39:48 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: blam
Early ancestors of the NBA?
To: farmfriend
Add me to the list please
To: blam
Hmmmm . . .
25
posted on
08/11/2003 6:32:19 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is slavery)
To: BenLurkin
That looks like the "Heaven's Gate" guy.
To: BenLurkin
9,400 year old Spirit Cave Man, the oldest mummy ever found in the Americas.
27
posted on
08/11/2003 8:23:26 AM PDT
by
blam
To: BenLurkin
28
posted on
08/11/2003 8:27:49 AM PDT
by
blam
To: BenLurkin
29
posted on
08/11/2003 8:39:47 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Thanks for the links - I will check them later when I have time to read! I am unconvinced of the current scientific dogma concerning evolution and recent human development. I am not a creationist in the sense of everything started 6000 years ago; more of a Vedic creationist. The time line in the Vedas is in the billions of years, which can easily co-exist with evolutionary theories (and they are theories). The Vedas assert that fully developed humans hae been around for a long, long time. Actually in one of the Vedas (can't remember which one) there is reference to a planetary or stellar configuration observed at the time of writing, which can only have happened 26,000 years ago. Interesting.
To: blam
There is much more to the story, and that has been left out.
To: pram
32
posted on
08/11/2003 4:16:28 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
I did see that article, and it is interesting, and it is even more interesting that maintream archeologists and historians always seem to ignore findings that don't agree with their time frames...
To: blam
Bump
34
posted on
11/14/2003 4:45:12 PM PST
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson