Dig Site Bringing To Light Artifacts As Old As 7,000 Years (SW Pennsylvania)

Tribune Review ^ | 8-10-2003 | Mark Berton

[blam]

Read some of the articles from this site.

[piasa]

Davis said the time period fits the time that the Adena Indians were prevalent in the region.

In other words, it's an Early Woodland period site.

[snopercod]

Early ancestors of the NBA?

[the-ironically-named-proverbs2]

Add me to the list please

[BenLurkin]

Hmmmm . . .

[Richard Kimball]

That looks like the "Heaven's Gate" guy.

[blam]

9,400 year old Spirit Cave Man, the oldest mummy ever found in the Americas.

[blam]

Skeletal Remains May Be 11,000 Years Old (Lake Jackson, Texas)

[blam]

Ancient Immigrants.

[First Amendment]

Thanks for the links - I will check them later when I have time to read! I am unconvinced of the current scientific dogma concerning evolution and recent human development. I am not a creationist in the sense of everything started 6000 years ago; more of a Vedic creationist. The time line in the Vedas is in the billions of years, which can easily co-exist with evolutionary theories (and they are theories). The Vedas assert that fully developed humans hae been around for a long, long time. Actually in one of the Vedas (can't remember which one) there is reference to a planetary or stellar configuration observed at the time of writing, which can only have happened 26,000 years ago. Interesting.

[First_Salute]

There is much more to the story, and that has been left out.

[blam]

"The time line in the Vedas is in the billions of years, which can easily co-exist with evolutionary theories (and they are theories)"

You may find this discovery interesting:

Civilisation From 7,500BC Discovered Off Indian Coast

[First Amendment]

I did see that article, and it is interesting, and it is even more interesting that maintream archeologists and historians always seem to ignore findings that don't agree with their time frames...

[blam]

Bump