1 posted on
08/11/2003 12:45:06 AM PDT by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Wonderful news...Can go to bed happy!
2 posted on
08/11/2003 12:46:15 AM PDT by
lainde
To: ambrose
My goodness . . .
To: ambrose
A total slap in the face of Davis and his Scum Crew of Mulholland and Company! I love it!
5 posted on
08/11/2003 12:53:09 AM PDT by
Timesink
To: ambrose
"Hasta la vista, baby"
6 posted on
08/11/2003 12:55:26 AM PDT by
Ichneumon
To: ambrose
I think you'll see a very high turnout for this one because:
a. it's historical - one of those "Daddy, did you really vote in that election?" questions 50 years from now.
b. it's receiving saturation media coverage.
c. there are more crazy stories here to interest even the most jaded voter.
d. every vote is going to count since nobody needs a majority to win - except Davis. If Davis fails, a candidate could possibly win with under 20% of the vote. Let's see them call Bush "illegitimate" after that! (of course, the Dems will still try.)
If you can get 20% of Californians to vote for your loony-tune candidate, you're handed the governor's mansion even if there was no way in the world that 50% would have ever voted for him/her/it.
8 posted on
08/11/2003 1:18:18 AM PDT by
Tall_Texan
(http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
To: ambrose
Looking at the polling numbers, McClintock and Simon need to come to an understanding that removes one of them from the running...
To: Coop
CA recall poll *ping*
11 posted on
08/11/2003 1:44:23 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~Forget sporting, blow the RINO muthas heads clean off - Hasta la vista, baby !~)
To: ambrose
This is from the LIBERAL Gallup poll! The Gray Davis kool aid drinkers won't be able to spin their way out of this one. Nearly every one in California, except for the few special interests in his corner, can't wait to get rid of him. My prediction is the margin will be even larger than the one recorded by Gallup. It will put paid to Davis' hopes of a future presidential run.
12 posted on
08/11/2003 1:53:01 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: ambrose
"Arnold Schwarzenegger draws the most support, with the current lieutenant governor a distant second place."
17 posted on
08/11/2003 5:21:35 AM PDT by
TheDon
(Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
To: ambrose
replace him with a popular Hollywood actor with virtually no political experience. Welllllll. They just had to toss that little slam in there, didn't they? That information is "so important" they just had to put that in there.
My guess is they "don't like" their own poll results.
19 posted on
08/11/2003 6:04:11 AM PDT by
concerned about politics
("He who controls communications rules the world." - Adolf Hitler)
To: ambrose
See also, from that
Gallup poll:
SUMMARY TABLE: CHANCE OF VOTING FOR EACH CANDIDATE
2003 Aug 7-10 (sorted by "registered voters") |
Very good/good chance (Registered Voters) |
Very good/good chance (Probable Voters) |
|
% |
% |
Actor, Arnold Schwarzenegger |
42 |
48 |
Former Los Angeles Mayor, Richard Riordan |
24 |
26 |
Lieutenant Governor, Cruz Bustamante |
22 |
23 |
State Senator, Tom McClintock |
13 |
13 |
Businessman, Bill Simon |
13 |
11 |
Congresswoman, Loretta Sanchez |
12 |
9 |
Insurance Commissioner, John Garamendi |
10 |
9 |
Former Baseball Commissioner, Peter Ueberroth |
7 |
8 |
Former California Secretary of State, Bill Jones |
8 |
5 |
Columnist, Arianna Huffington |
7 |
5 |
Green Party Leader, Peter Camejo |
6 |
5 |
Hustler magazine publisher, Larry Flynt |
6 |
4 |
Actor, Gary Coleman |
2 |
3 |
Not a candidate |
Note that Schwarzenegger (48) plus Riordan (26) =
74%
23 posted on
08/11/2003 6:59:02 AM PDT by
RonDog
To: Coop
Poll ping. Wow. Grayout has to be going nuts....
25 posted on
08/11/2003 7:02:23 AM PDT by
eureka!
(Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
To: ambrose
In polling, registered voters are the only voters that matter. Why pollsters continue to pay attention to anybody else is beyond me. If you aren't registered to vote, your opinion means squat.
32 posted on
08/11/2003 7:23:28 AM PDT by
SamAdams76
(Back in boot camp! 232.4 (-67.6))
To: ambrose; *calgov2002; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; snopercod; ...
33 posted on
08/11/2003 7:29:11 AM PDT by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
To: ambrose
Bill Jones is running? Who knew?
*Simon, Uberoth, Jones, this is your Monday morning wake up call* You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here.
36 posted on
08/11/2003 7:54:18 AM PDT by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Governor McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: ambrose
California voters seem poised to dump their current governor more than three years before his term expires and replace him with a popular Hollywood actor with virtually no political experience. People always harp on this. Davis is a career politician (as was Clinton). Look at what Davis did for California.
Ahhhnold can't do any worse.
56 posted on
08/11/2003 9:22:05 AM PDT by
hattend
To: ambrose
Am trying to restrain myself from having an 'orgasmic fantasy' here . . .
but . . .
COULD IT POSSIBLY BE
THAT
BILLDO and her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous--Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Marx de Kevorkian de Sade
and their advice to Gray Sewerwater Davis
could be seen to have helped crash the democrucds in Californicate down around their ankle tatoos and ankle bondage chains????
COULD IT POSSIBLY BE???
COULD IT POSSIBLY FURTHER BE that THEN the evil undynamic duo would be listened to FARRRRRRRRRRRRRRR less?
DEAR LORD, PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, MAKE IT SO!
71 posted on
08/11/2003 11:26:30 AM PDT by
Quix
(PLEASE SHARE THE TRUTH RE BILLDO AND SHRILLERY FAR AND WIDE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson