Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Total California Recall [David Horowitz: Arnold is "the only possibility of a win for state GOP"]
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | August 11, 2003 | David Horowitz

Posted on 08/11/2003 9:16:06 AM PDT by RonDog

Total California Recall
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | August 11, 2003

From the outset the California recall was a bad idea for Republicans. It was a lose, lose, lose situation. Without the recall Republicans would have contended for an open seat in 2006 against a non-incumbent Democrat running on a crippled legacy. The recall introduced three basic possibilities into this mix, all of them bad.

The first of these would be a defeat of the recall and hence a win for the Democrats. The second would be a victory for the recall but the election of a Democrat to replace Davis, forcing Republicans to face an incumbent in 2006. The third would be a victory for the recall and a Republican governor. Ironically, this would have created the possibility for the worst scenario of all.

The victory of a Republican would have meant a conservative governor with a plurality of 20 percent. Even this would probably be optimistic since Republicans notoriously lack discipline, guaranteeing a full Republican field. Thus a conservative victory would set up a conservative disaster.

If Issa, Simon or McClintock had indeed won with 20 percent of the vote, he would have absolutely no mandate to govern. He would inherit a $38 billion deficit. He would face an overwhelming Democrat majority in the state legislature and the press. Moreover, being an isolated conservative with a small constituency, he would be unable to counter these disadvantages by going over the heads of the legislature and the media to the public to promote his agenda. He would have no popular base in the state. Thus, he would have no option to reduce the deficit by cutting the programs and payrolls fattened in the Davis years as the economy and state revenues were bottoming.

In other words a Republican victory would have led to the discrediting of fiscal conservatism and the prospect of twenty years of unchallenged liberal Democratic rule.

But the entrance of Arnold Schwarzenegger into the race has changed all that. Suddenly Republicans have an opportunity to take back the governorship, revive their all but dead party, and make themselves competitive again in the Golden State.

To understand this one must first understand that Schwarzenegger is above all a "modern" candidate (I borrow this term from Democratic strategist Michael Berman, who wickedly defines it as being pro-choice, anti-cigarette companies and believing that God is a tree). The last Republican Governor, Pete Wilson, if not entirely modern in this sense, was nonetheless a pro-choice, social moderate, He put together an electoral majority by taking two conservative issues which some modernists covertly support -- opposition to racial preferences and illegal immigration and forging a winning majority behind them.

Nearly a decade of statewide electoral contests since Wilson's retirement have shown that no candidate can win statewide office in California -- any statewide office -- who is not "modern." The insipid Gray Davis beat a pro-life typically starched Republican conservative, Dan Lungren, in a 1996 landslide election that took down the entire state Republican Party. In the wake of the Davis's tsunami, Republicans were left with two minor statewide offices. One of the offices was held by a crook, who had to resign. Now Republicans hold none.

Four years later, Barbara Boxer -- unpopular even with Democrats -- beat Matt Fong over the gay issue and with a phony but effective attack that represented him as an anti-environmental extremist. George Bush who is pro-life and does not believe that God is a tree, lost to Al Gore by a million votes in the same election despite a campaign of "compassionate conservatism." The Gore camp did not have to spend a penny in the state to win. Then in 2002 a hugely unpopular Gray Davis thrashed conservative Bill Simon despite droves of Democrats who sat on their hands because they could not bring themselves to even hold their noses and vote for the incumbent. These results should show anyone who cares to look that the California electorate does not resonate with social conservatism and will not vote for anyone who isn't "modern."

Another term for "modern" might be "cool." John McCain is a cool Republican and could have carried the state in 2000 if the Republican primary electorate had not preferred George Bush. 

Now comes Arnold Schwarzenegger a fiscal and national security conservative who is the epitome of cool. Suddenly Republicans have become people that Hollywood not only wants to know, but already does know. And respect. With Arnold's entry into the race the political landscape of California -- and beyond it the nation -- has changed.

I am amazed at Democrats who have been quoted saying that Schwarzenegger can be damaged with references to possible amorous indiscretions and dalliances with Sixties recreational substances. Californians will love him for that -- or forgive him. I am more amazed at Dick Morris who thinks that Arnold's celebrity has peaked. It is only beginning. He is one of the few actors in Hollywood that the American public regards as serious person, a shrewd businessman and a master of his own image. Perfect credentials for a prospective governor. 

I am less amazed at conservative Republicans who still don't get it (because that's actually what Republicans are famous for) and are still in the race. As previously noted, even if a Republican candidate like Tom McClintock or Bill Simon could win the plurality to become governor, which they can't, their administration would be a disaster -- for them, for Republicans and for their conservative cause. If conservatives want to make California a conservative state they need to lay a lot more groundwork for that to be possible.

Arnold's is a dream candidacy for the Republican Party, which he alone can rescue from the dead. He has already made Republicans more user friendly to the public at large. He will make it easier for media talent in the state to relate to the Republican Party, which has ramifications for campaigns beyond California. He will inspire significant numbers of independents to vote for his party. And if he is elected -- unlike the conservatives biting at his heels -- he will be a formidable counter-balance to the Democratic legislature, which means he could actually improve the financial condition of the state.

If Governor Schwarzenegger were to do the right thing -- for example veto Democratic attempts to protect their expensive programs -- he would be in a position politically to resist their override. He could just take his enormous popularity and media presence into their individual senatorial and assembly districts and immediately threaten their electoral futures, so great is his popularity and media presence. Of course politics has its uncertainties and unseen pitfalls and no one knows if Arnold will be able to navigate them successfully. But if he manages to do so and win, he will actually have a chance to revive the state and run for a second term.

Even more important, Governor Schwarzenegger would change the political equation for the next presidential contest in 2004. A Bush 2004 campaign with Arnold as the President's point man in the state would unquestionably turn it into a competitive affair. This means that even if Bush does not ultimately win the state, the Democrats will have to pour big dollars into the state to contest the election. The drain of money and resources will impact close races across the country.

For all these reasons Republicans of all factions should rejoice at the Schwarzenegger candidacy. It offers the only possibility of a win for state Republicans or for the Bush campaign in California. It will help to revive the California Republican Party. And it could reshape the politics of the nation.


David Horowitz is the author of numerous books including an autobiography, Radical Son, which has been described as “the first great autobiography of his generation,” and which chronicles his odyssey from radical activism to the current positions he holds. Among his other books are The Politics of Bad Faith and The Art of Political War. The Art of Political War was described by White House political strategist Karl Rove as “the perfect guide to winning on the political battlefield.” Horowitz’s latest book, Uncivil Wars, was published in January this year, and chronicles his crusade against intolerance and racial McCarthyism on college campuses last spring. Click here to read more about David


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; davidhorowitz; davis; governor; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger; simon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
"I see, I thought you were forwarding the ol' lines."

I see now how it seemed that way.
61 posted on 08/11/2003 2:39:16 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals (All Dems is Pimps and Ho's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
I hope conservatives (myself included) are more realistic this time.

I truly thought Simon could win last time and that is with two choices. Now we have McClintock and Simon splitting the conservative vote with Arnold grabbing the moderate Dems and Reps. In this situation, Bustamante just might win!!

I can not imagine recalling Davis only to put Bustamante in there. It's like taking out the trash and just bringing it right back in again.

LET'S KEEP FOCUSED!
62 posted on 08/11/2003 2:46:22 PM PDT by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
From a purely substantive standpoint, State Sen. Tom McClintock (Who was my own Assemblyman back when I lived in California in the 80s and early 90s) is FAR AND AWAY the best candidate to lead California. I would vote for him for Governor here in Nevada in a heartbeat over our current RINO Governor Guinn. HOWEVER, as explainted by David Horowitz in this piece and others, he simply cannot win, and even if he did it would be with a small minority of voters, an overwhelmingly liberal state legislature, and likely turn out to be a completely pyhrric victory for conservatives.

Unfortunately for Tom, unlike Rep. Issa, Bill Simon has chosen to put his own ego (and checkbook) ahead of principle and party loyalty by running again. The "results on the ground" as Hugh Hewitt referred to are that McClintock simply has virtually NO chance of being elected. Nor for that matter, does Simon. It is very unfortunate, but it is reality. Conservatives are a MINORITY in California and becoming a smaller and smaller minority as the state becomes more and more "diverse".

That being said, Arnold is the best choice under the circumstances. I can understand not wanting to support a proven RINO (And generous contributor to Democrats) like Dick Riordan. However, we can at least hope that Arnold might just turn out to be more conservative than advertised (and at least he DID vote for Prop. 187). If nothing else, he will help W. by forcing the Dems to spend money to contest the state in 2004. Further, as Horowitz points out, Arnold could be a HUGE help in fundraising for other G.O.P. Candidates around the country. My gut tells me that this is one case where conservatives need to put aside their philisophical objections and close ranks around the Terminator as the best man to advance our long term interests...
63 posted on 08/11/2003 3:04:42 PM PDT by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dmanLA
I can not imagine recalling Davis only to put Bustamante in there. It's like taking out the trash and just bringing it right back in again

EXACTLY!!! That would be just getting "Davis" back. Like having his TWIN step in.

64 posted on 08/11/2003 3:07:07 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
I support the Terminator; called Cox, Drier, and Thomas, Cal Reps and told them to support Arnold.
65 posted on 08/11/2003 3:07:37 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Governor Schwarzenegger would change the political equation for the next presidential contest in 2004

I heard that the Bush Administration is getting excited about the possiblity of Gov. Schwarzenegger. I also heard that Arnold came out AGAINST partial birth abortion and FOR parental consent for abortion. That's good. And I doubt Arnold would go out of his way to further restrict our gun rights.

I will be voting for Tom McClintock but I won't cry when Arnold gets elected.

66 posted on 08/11/2003 3:08:24 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: larlaw
BUMP for your post 63!!!

You said what I was trying to say but much more "succinctly".

I never said I could WRITE!! :o)

Thanks!!
67 posted on 08/11/2003 3:09:13 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Met Horowitz. Was very impressed.
68 posted on 08/11/2003 3:09:39 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
it will be funny to see what the Clinton's do: publically diss Davis, or support him and risk humiliation themselves!
69 posted on 08/11/2003 3:11:55 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Everybody gets it except the McClintock bots.

I wish you would have heard McClintock's speeches this weekend in Burbank at the NFRA/CRA conventions. However, I will say this about that: Maybe McClintock and Simon should consider dropping out. If McClintock does not drop out, I will be voting for him. He is a true blue conservative.

Wouldn't it be neat if Arnold and Tom could have a little chat?

70 posted on 08/11/2003 3:14:51 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: larlaw
I'm looking forward to Arnold's victory speech:

"Governor Davis, you are terminated!"
71 posted on 08/11/2003 3:16:21 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
No problem...I guess all that money I spent on law school was good for at least SOMETHING worthwhile. lol
72 posted on 08/11/2003 3:16:23 PM PDT by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
wouldn't surprise me if Arnold would pick a pro-life judge either, maybe some conservative pressure on Arnold now (ie we help him with votes, let him know we're pro-life) and he'll pick good judges. Justice Brown will be leaving once the Senate Dems stop their stupid games, so Arnold if he wins will have to appoint SC justices.

73 posted on 08/11/2003 3:18:15 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
That would be my preference...Sen. McClintock agrees to support Arnold in exchange for supporting Tom for his next bid for higher office and deferring to his budgetary expertise if and when Arnold is elected...
74 posted on 08/11/2003 3:18:43 PM PDT by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
That would be my preference...Sen. McClintock agrees to support Arnold in exchange for supporting Tom for his next bid for higher office and deferring to his budgetary expertise if and when Arnold is elected...
75 posted on 08/11/2003 3:19:00 PM PDT by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
That would be my preference...Sen. McClintock agrees to support Arnold in exchange for supporting Tom for his next bid for higher office and deferring to his budgetary expertise if and when Arnold is elected...
76 posted on 08/11/2003 3:19:02 PM PDT by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: larlaw
So... what would be your preference?

Dan
77 posted on 08/11/2003 3:20:25 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: larlaw
Despite all the "lawyer" jokes, we love em'!! Our son are one!!!

LOL!!
78 posted on 08/11/2003 3:20:27 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Although I'd like a pro-life governor, in states like NY, and CA, it's interesting to see a race between an anti-partial birth abortion R and an abortion on demand D. This highlights the depths of evil the Democrat party has sunk to on the issue of abortion which is good for all too see.

I support Arnold, by the way.
79 posted on 08/11/2003 3:21:37 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
lol...sorry for the triplicate
80 posted on 08/11/2003 3:22:17 PM PDT by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson