Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Use Those Words: Fox News Owns Them
Los Angeles Times ^ | 08-14-2003 | Jack M. Balkin

Posted on 08/14/2003 6:41:24 AM PDT by boris

Don't Use Those Words: Fox News Owns Them

By Jack M. Balkin, Jack M. Balkin teaches constitutional law at Yale Law School.

Fox News is suing comedian and writer Al Franken in the New York courts, attempting to stop the sale of his forthcoming book, "Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right." Fox claims that Franken may not use the expression "fair and balanced" because it has been trademarked by Fox News and that Franken's book would confuse viewers about the source of the book and about the objectivity of its coverage.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: copyrights; foxnews; franken; trademarks
Editor Los Angeles Times

Sir:

Jack M. Balkin reasons like a lawyer, which is precisely his problem. He and his ilk have created a litigious society in which, e.g., Spike Lee can sue TNN for daring to use "Spike TV" as its new moniker, and the designer Oleg Cassini can send a "cease and desist" letter to JPL for naming a spacecraft "Cassini" in violation of his "trademark". Invincible ignorance (in this case, of the astronomer Giovanni Domenico Cassini [1625-1712]) is no impediment to lawsuits. I suppose that Oleg may actually be related to the other Cassini. It is possible that Al Franken is not a leftist shill--in some alternate universe. But the message to Balkin is simple: you made this bed, now lie in it. The Democrats are shopping around for legal talent to help them trademark the terms "ignorant", "Anti-American", and "socialist". Perhaps Belkin has some time for pro-bono work to help them. Franken can help with the advertising.

--Boris

P.S. Here is "professor" Balkin's email, should freepers wish to share an opinion with him:
Jack.balkin@yale.edu

1 posted on 08/14/2003 6:41:25 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: boris
Did you send that?

If you did, great work!
2 posted on 08/14/2003 6:43:56 AM PDT by conservativemusician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
Well, regardless of how it turns out, I really don't think that many people are going to "confuse" Al Franken with Fox.....

Tia

3 posted on 08/14/2003 6:47:12 AM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativemusician
"Did you send that?"

Of course.

However, the LAT only publishes me ~2x per year; I had a short letter earlier this month saying I planned to vote for Larry Flynt because he is precisely the sort of 'governor' that CA and its electorate deserve.

So I doubt (for many reasons) they'll print this one.

--Boris

4 posted on 08/14/2003 6:55:26 AM PDT by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
Al Franken is a Big Fat Idiot.
5 posted on 08/14/2003 6:56:28 AM PDT by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boris
"Fox will richly deserve the bad press it's going to get for filing this lawsuit, first, for being on the wrong side of a free speech controversy and, second, for attempting to squelch criticism of its coverage of the news. It is egregious for a news organization to try to use the courts to harass its political critics."

< sarcasm>The LA Times.. I can't beleive they would take such a stance ..< /sarcasm>

6 posted on 08/14/2003 6:56:29 AM PDT by Tank-FL (Keep the Faith - GO VMI Beat NAVY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
This is rich, coming as it does from the LA Times, one of the newspapers that sued Free Republic for posting its articles.

The hypocrisy of the Left is a wonder to behold.

7 posted on 08/14/2003 7:07:23 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
"...Larry Flynt because he is precisely the sort of 'governor' that CA and its electorate deserve."

That's too damn funny. True, but funny nonetheless.
8 posted on 08/14/2003 7:10:00 AM PDT by conservativemusician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boris
"Trademark, like copyright, has now become a general-purpose device for private parties to use when they want the state to suppress speech they do not like."

While Fox has no case under trademark law, my response to this bed-wetter is that Franken is free to express all the ideas he wants without using the trademark of another company on the packaging of goods he is trying to sell.
9 posted on 08/14/2003 7:54:54 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba; Jim Robinson
"Trademark, like copyright, has now become a general-purpose device for private parties to use when they want the state to suppress speech they do not like."

You can't make this stuff up.

10 posted on 08/14/2003 8:30:23 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: boris
I wonder if there are a minimum number of words in a sequence that can be copyrighted or for that mater, notes in a tune.

Of course, you can register a copyright to anything by just submitting it and paying the (I think) $35 fee.

My son and I were talking about this the other night in regard to the recording industry. We were joking around about copyrighting a note or two and then claim a violation if the music industry used them.


11 posted on 08/14/2003 8:48:04 AM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; xflisa; lainde; ..
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

12 posted on 08/14/2003 5:09:34 PM PDT by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
13 posted on 08/14/2003 8:31:45 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smiley
Al Franken is a Big Fat Idiot.

I don't think you can say that any more. Al owns the "big fat" thing - I mean, admit it - when you hear the words "big fat idiot" or "big fat moron" or "big fat ignoramus" or "big fat stupid slob" who do you think of?

Well?

I rest my case.

My bill's in the mail...

14 posted on 08/14/2003 8:36:45 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: boris
"You're watching the Weather Channel. Sue, er, live by it."

foreverfree

15 posted on 08/14/2003 8:42:06 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babygene
"My son and I were talking about this the other night in regard to the recording industry. We were joking around about copyrighting a note or two and then claim a violation if the music industry used them."

You should have copyrighted "is" and sued Clinton.

--Boris

16 posted on 08/15/2003 6:29:31 AM PDT by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: boris

17 posted on 08/17/2003 2:25:41 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative (Can't prove a negative? You're not stupid. Prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
Book & Author Luncheon
Watch 1 hr. 29 mins.
Al Franken, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right"
Molly Ivins, "Bushwhacked"
Bill O'Reilly, "Who's Looking Out for You?"
Pat Schroeder, Assn. of American Publishers, President & CEO - Moderator

18 posted on 08/17/2003 2:42:29 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative (Can't prove a negative? You're not stupid. Prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babygene; boris
My son and I were talking about this the other night in regard to the recording industry. We were joking around about copyrighting a note or two and then claim a violation if the music industry used them.

Why not? NBC got away with trademarking only three notes.

19 posted on 08/20/2003 9:55:08 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson