Posted on 08/16/2003 8:45:08 AM PDT by mrweb
Mortgage company suddenly closes doors
A national mortgage company with operations in Washington abruptly closed its doors yesterday, potentially leaving thousands of homebuyers without loans. Capitol Commerce Mortgage, a Sacramento, Calif.-based company that buys loans and sells them to investors, closed after it likely failed to adjust for rising rates for home loans. The company had an office in Bellevue and total loans of more than $1 billion in Washington, said Chuck Cross, acting director of consumer services for the state Department of Financial Institutions (DFI). "We're hearing that they have closed," Cross said. "They have advised people that they are unable to fund their loans."
Individuals have rushed to lock in record-low interest rates in recent weeks, overwhelming many mortgage processors. Mortgage wholesalers buy home loans from originators and then sell them to investors. Some wholesalers haven't been able to find investors before rates rose. The rate on a 30-year mortgage averaged 6.6 percent as of Thursday compared to a low of 5.31 percent June 11, according to HSH Associates, a New Jersey firm that surveys 2,000 lenders nationwide.
Michelle Bentley, a Capitol Commerce employee in Bellevue, said she and her co-workers were shocked Thursday night when a boss said, "We no longer exist." No reason was given, said Bentley, who had worked as a funder, closing loans since Capitol Commerce opened its Bellevue branch two years ago. The extent of the closure's impact is unclear, though borrowers likely will have to go to another lender and likely pay a higher rate. Since mortgage rates have risen about one percentage point in the last month, for a borrower financing a $270,000 home the difference works out to about $172 a month, said Dean Stewart at Evergreen Pacific Services, a mortgage broker in Renton. "Over the life of the loan, that's a lot of money," he said. "This makes brokers look bad."
Cross said there could be similar closures among small or midsized lenders if they are unprepared for a sudden swing in rates and are holding a large basket of unfunded loans locked in at the low rates.
Cross said Capitol Commerce had assets of more than $400 million last year and made nearly 7,000 loans in Washington, averaging about $168,000 each. The company appeared viable, based on financial statements submitted to the agency in 2001, 2002 and 2003, Cross said. As of late yesterday, Cross' department said it had received two consumer complaints about Capitol. One came from an Enumclaw couple, who reported they had refinanced with Capitol and expected to be signing papers Monday or Tuesday. Yesterday they received a call from their broker saying the company had closed, according to the couple's complaint.
The DFI issued a statement late yesterday that it knows of two out-of-state lenders operating in Washington that have been unable to honor loan commitments in the past few days.
In addition to Capitol, a department spokesman said the other is Tucson, Ariz.-based Fidelity Mortgage Co., a broker that also has an office in Bellevue that continues to operate. It has been the subject of at least 13 consumer complaints filed with the DFI or the state Attorney General's office.
Fidelity attracted homeowners with offers of low-interest mortgages with no closing costs. This month it has sent letters to nearly 50 would-be borrowers in Washington informing them it will not be able to obtain financing for them before their lock-in periods expired. Cross said his agency's preliminary review found no indication Fidelity had violated state law. He said the company apparently acted in good faith, and the standard disclosure documents borrowers received and signed included a clause allowing Fidelity to relock at a different rate if it could not obtain funding for "any reason."
Fidelity president Scott Brittenham said earlier this week that, while "we wish the heck this hadn't happened," the company has done nothing illegal. He said "no one on the planet" could have foreseen the swift jump in interest rates. But some consumers are exploring legal action. Bellevue lawyer Gary Abolofia said a class-action suit for breach of contract is possible. But "people have a right to feel as if they are victims," Cross added.
Among the upset homeowners is John Donovan of Bellevue, who thought he had "a slam-dunk deal" with Fidelity to lower his house payments and finance home improvements. "A rate-lock agreement was signed," he recalled. "There were signed documents from both parties." But Donovan got a letter from Brittenham, dated Aug. 1. "Due to the unusually high demand for mortgage loans this past several weeks," Brittenham wrote, "we will not be able to fund your loan at your fee and interest rate lock agreement within the required time period. We will contact you as soon as we are able to fund your loan."
Brittenham also apologized for "any inconvenience our temporary inability to fund your loan has caused." In an Aug. 8 e-mail to Donovan, Fidelity's regional manager, Ron Greene, wrote: "I completely share your disappointment and frustration. The company let you down and it let every employee in my office down." Brittenham said the company plans to refund customers for out-of-pocket expenses, such as appraisal costs or late-payment fees some borrowers may have been assessed if they did not pay their old lender because they believed they had a new mortgage through Fidelity. But such sweeteners have not appeased all borrowers. Scott Hughes of Snohomish said in a complaint to state regulators that he had been expecting a $50,000 check to pay for home improvements by refinancing through Fidelity. Like Donovan, he got a letter this month from Brittenham pulling out of the deal. "I had no idea this company wouldn't do this," Hughes said. "It was nothing but smoke and mirrors."
Fidelity Mortgage has sued The Seattle Times Co., alleging the newspaper has published false and deceptive information "in regular and ongoing seasonal and weekly mortgage-rate directory articles." The Times has filed papers to dismiss the suit, which is pending in U.S. District Court in Seattle.
Bubble Boy alert! Bubble Boy Alert! Bubble Boy Alert!
Nothing. The only people who should be impacted are the people in the process of getting a loan.
As I understand it, companies like this immediately sell your loan. They don't hold it.
Or either they never "own" it in the first place, just act as brokers for other underwriters.
Of course, I could be wrong. :-)
This should not come as a surprise. Too many people buying too many houses for too little money using every creative financing scheme in the books. You know it can't last forever.
A friend of mine just sold her house for 130K. The folks that bought it went FHA and put down less than 2K. The market won't stand for funny business like this.
Damed glad my house is pd for.
Barring a miracle, you are correct. Personal debt is extremely high. The growth in credit card debt is freighting. Something has to happen and I am afraid it will not be pretty.
Money about to dry up, is more like it. You have to wonder how Fannie and Freddie Mac keep assuming risk on goofy loans at such a low rate of return. If the credit bubble does burst, i.e., the money does dry up, you're looking at a real hit on the GDP as well. Should be interesting.
With average household credit card debt close to $9,000 dollars and personal savings rate at about 3.8% there is not a lot of wiggle room. Especially considering that half of all American families have savings of $1,000.00 or less .
If people cannot pay back their loans then the lenders must eat them (the loans not the people). Depending on the solvency of the lenders massive defaults could trigger bank failures. I am not sure how it will turn out but many people are living way beyond their means, this cannot go on indefinably. Something has to give.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.