Skip to comments.
Free Cable Television Service at Risk for those in Public Housing
Columbia, Missouri Daily Tribune ^
| 8.21.2003
| Dave Moore
Posted on 08/21/2003 1:17:41 PM PDT by rface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: All
We don't have cable due to the cost (it is either DSL or cable tv and DSL wins).
The idea that that fat slob can't live without cable television is disgusting.
Make her pay for it on her own. If she dies, so what.
21
posted on
08/21/2003 1:41:04 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: Leroy S. Mort
I was thinking the same thing. If she is counting twinkies as groceries--it could be a good thing.
22
posted on
08/21/2003 1:41:23 PM PDT
by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: rface
The matter has been referred to the councils cable television committee. Ahhh, the age of specialization. They've got a committee on cable tv and can't figure out why they were getting free service from the cable company. Somebody had to wire all those apartments and it didn't occur to anybody that they weren't paying for it. Just assumed it was a civil right, I suppose, like free internet, free telephone, free utilities and free medical care. It must me right there in the Constitution. Oooops, they lost their copy of that, too?
To: Leroy S. Mort
Looks like her "free" service may also be a hugh health risk. They should disconnect it before more series harm is done or risk large suits.
24
posted on
08/21/2003 1:42:33 PM PDT
by
azhenfud
(For every government action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.)
To: rface
Hey, there is an obvious way out of this. The two locations continue to get the service for free and the city government will pick up the tab. No, no problem. Happy to do it. The city has money and, well, they have need. And, before too long, there will be three city employees handling the arrangements and the cost to the city per apartment will be about twice the cost of each individual paying for it himself. The "premium" will go to cash payments to the city manager and goodies for members of the city council. It isn't fair that the really juicy perqs go to the politicians and public employees in the jourisdictions hosting a professional sports franchise. Cable contracts are a way to provide some equity.
25
posted on
08/21/2003 1:43:20 PM PDT
by
Tacis
To: RichInOC
You DO however have the right to sing the blues and paint the walls (no loud colors) and by God I will NOT argue about this. :)
26
posted on
08/21/2003 1:43:48 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(Some say shoot to kill. Others say shoot to maim. I say empty the f'n clip and let God make the call)
To: Leroy S. Mort
You guys are iceholes.
Clearly, she is pregnant.
27
posted on
08/21/2003 1:45:16 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: junkyarddawg
don't they have a lot of nerve getting pissed off about anything since they get everything for free already.
That's the welfare mentality - gimme, gimme, gimme, never mind that I don't want to earn my way or contribute anything to society. They've had everything handed to them, and they don't know (or care) how to do anything for themselves. After all, the government teat will never run dry.
28
posted on
08/21/2003 1:45:32 PM PDT
by
gsrinok
To: junkyarddawg
Lyndon Johnson's "great society", also known as the biggest mistake made by a president in the history of this country created a whole culture of entitlement. I think some "tough love" is needed to turn it around. Just let them suck their thumbs and cry themselves to sleep a few times, and when the cable doesn't come back on, they'll have to amuse themselves.
29
posted on
08/21/2003 1:45:39 PM PDT
by
Texan5
To: Texan5
next she will want to sue the cable company for making her fat. she did't exercise because she was watching cable t.v.
To: Prof Engineer
Look at it this way, it probably lowers the crime rate in the area.
31
posted on
08/21/2003 1:47:46 PM PDT
by
dljordan
To: AppyPappy
Clearly, she is pregnant. What? now we gotta pay for that too?
32
posted on
08/21/2003 1:48:14 PM PDT
by
Drango
(To Serve Man ... IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
To: rface
Virginia Piltz is confined to a motorized cart and hampered by the crumbling sidewalks and curbs around her Paquin Tower apartment as well as handicap-inaccessible stores and restaurants. Those evil stores and restaurants. And the crumbling sidewalks and curbs are part of a VRWC, no doubt. /sarcasm
Piltz is on a fixed income, and if she had to pay for cable TV, shed have to go without groceries if she wanted cable, she said.
From the photo, a fixed diet might allow her enough extra to pay for her cable.
Chiles raised the issue in a hearing on the renewal of Mediacoms franchise contract with Columbia. Already, Mediacom has taken heat from local public-access cable proponents who claim the firm hasnt taken seriously its requests to establish a public-access cable channel. The council is considering whether to renew Mediacoms cable contract with the city, where there are 46,000 subscribers.
IOW, it's our way or the highway, Mediacom.
33
posted on
08/21/2003 1:49:11 PM PDT
by
auboy
To: AppyPappy
If that woman is pregnant, I'll eat my shoe.
To: rface
Virginia Piltz is confined to a motorized cart and hampered by the crumbling sidewalks and curbs around her Paquin Tower apartment as well as handicap-inaccessible stores and restaurants. How unfortunate that this article didn't bother to tell us why Ms Piltz is confined to a motorized cart. Does she have a health problem which precludes her from walking? Is the inability to be active a partial cause of her weight problem? Or has she simply gotten large and now has a hard time getting around, thus she'd rather stay at home watching free tv?
I have true sympathy for people with health issues which confine them. I'd hope that good meaning people could work together (voluntarily) to help this woman get out of her home and out in the world. Surely that is better than giving her free tv so she stays at home and her problems worsen?
35
posted on
08/21/2003 1:52:35 PM PDT
by
Dianna
To: rface
Piltz is on a fixed income, and if she had to pay for cable TV, shed have to go without groceries if she wanted cable, she said. "Id go nuts if I didnt have it," Piltz said.
I just couldn't read the entire article. Has she ever heard of the library? The books are free and she might learn something and expand her mind!
36
posted on
08/21/2003 1:55:16 PM PDT
by
It's me
To: AppyPappy
Clearly, she is pregnant With what? A Segway?
To: AppyPappy
You guys are iceholes. Clearly, she is pregnantI do hope you are kidding! Anyway, pregnant with what? She's too old to be pregnant.
To: Leroy S. Mort
That's a "Haul-a-Bout".
39
posted on
08/21/2003 1:59:27 PM PDT
by
azhenfud
(For every government action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.)
To: AppyPappy
Clearly, she is pregnant. I worked with a woman for four years who has a similar build. During that time, she had two pregnancies. No one could visibly tell she was pregnant either time. The only proof that she was pregnant, was when she brought her babies to the office to meet her co-workers.
40
posted on
08/21/2003 2:01:57 PM PDT
by
auboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson