Replies

To Once-Ler, and Arnie and others, why in debate do you people have such arrogant snotty, insulting attitudes?

In post 58 I posted a message to Arne. I thanked him for putting up an excellent defense against Paleo-cons while being outnumbered 8 to 1 on this thread.

Reread your post of 59 where you butt in and call me and Arne "as clueless as liberals when it comes to the real world." You also responded without even reading what Arne actually wrote. This was our first interaction with each other.

Let us read your latest bucket of bile...

The fact is people who claim to be neo-conservatives are not well read beyond the WSJ editorial pages and a few books from favorite neo-con authors/idols, and more or less parrot talk radio hosts.

Well at least I don't confuse a sentence that reads "Democrats don't like white guys" with a sentence that reads "Republicans don't like white guys." Let me tell you about yourself. You are well versed in the Turner Diaries and you like the way you look in brown shirts.

Now look into the mirror buddy. Why do you think harsh words and strong opinions are only unfair when it is aimed at you. Grow up.

Actually I think Arnies defense was quite poor, he provided little in the way of substance, much less facts, just rhetoric that one gets from, as I said, from the WSJ editorial pages. The thread was quite reasonable untill you and Arnie started to spew the venom, and my remark stands, neo-conservatives are as clueless about the real world as liberals are. Certainly my and others remarks were far more measured than the venom and you and Arnie have spewed on this thread.

Saying that Paleo-cons are losers, want govrenment handouts and the like, getting quite defensive does little to help your side of the arguement. As for the borwn shirt remark, please, should I invoke Goodwins law now about a thread being over with a unwarranted NAZI reference?