Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Services for Peterson will be private
The Modesto Bee ^ | August 26, 2003 | John Cote'

Posted on 08/26/2003 5:29:27 AM PDT by runningbear

Services for Peterson will be private

Services for Peterson will be private

By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published: August 26, 2003, 04:52:21 AM PDT

Laci Peterson's family on Monday had not decided on funeral arrangements for her, but had determined that any ceremony will be closed to the public, a family spokeswoman said.

"They held the public memorial and appreciate the outpouring of support from the community," said Kim Petersen, executive director of the Carole Sund- Carrington Memorial Reward Foundation. The foundation has assisted the family since Laci Peterson, 27, was reported missing Christmas Eve.

"If they choose to do anything else, it will be done in private."

The search for the expectant mother and substitute teacher from Modesto rallied a community and drew the nation's gaze.

In May, an estimated 3,000 people flocked to a Modesto church for a memorial service on what would have been Peterson's 28th birthday.

Four months after her family reported her missing, Peterson's body was found washed up on the eastern shoreline of San Francisco Bay. The body of her unborn son, Conner, was found just over a mile away.

Peterson's husband, Scott, has been charged with two counts of murder in the deaths. He has pleaded innocent.

Last week, the Contra Costa County coroner's office released the remains to the Rocha family after Scott Peterson's defense team examined the bodies and later X-rayed the fetus.

The remains were transferred to the Stanislaus County coroner's .........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I Am Not a Member of a Satanic Cult

I Am Not a Member of a Satanic Cult

By Osha Neumann, AlterNet

August 26, 2003

I am not a member of a satanic cult and I did not kill Laci Peterson.

I'm not actually accused of killing Laci Peterson, the pregnant California woman who disappeared earlier this year and whose body was recently found. Scott Peterson, her husband, is currently the prime suspect. But his defense team has floated the theory that a satanic cult may have murdered his wife. The "evidence" for this theory is the paintings of a group of artists collectively known as SNIFF , with which I have been associated for four years.

For five years, SNIFF has worked in relative anonymity on the Albany Bulb, the tip of a wild and beautiful spit of overgrown landfill that juts out from the east shore of San Francisco Bay, just north of Berkeley. SNIFF artists began by painting on hunks of broken concrete that protrude along the shoreline. When they ran out of concrete, they began a series of paintings on plywood scavenged from the abandoned campsites of a prior generation of homeless squatters. Propped up on crude easels constructed of wood that washed up on the beach, the line of paintings now extends a considerable way along the waterfront – a gallery of outsider art without guards, curators or admission fees.

According to Scott Peterson's lawyers, the paintings of SNIFF depict "ritualistic killings and occult practices." That's ridiculous. Severed heads, yes. Ritual killings no. There's a painting intended as a warning to vandals who have savaged some of our art, that depicts an executioner chopping off their heads with an ax. There's a painting of a decapitated saint adrift in a row boat with a naked woman. His head with a halo lies at his feet. In a painting of a boxing gym, some of the boxers have had their heads literally knocked off.

The Modesto Bee reporter who broke the story informs readers that, "Many of the paintings portray sexual activity, and several show pregnant women."

That's true. They also show mermaids and volcanoes, carnivals, dancing bears in a circus, a hot tub, a horse.....

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bags and Baggage
Greta Van Susteren Goes on the Record In Her New Book

Bags and Baggage
Greta Van Susteren Goes on the Record In Her New Book

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 26, 2003; Page C01

After the O.J. Simpson trial that propelled her to the pinnacle of legal punditry, Greta Van Susteren was on the phone trying to land the first interview with the disgraced football star.

Forty-five minutes later, she said: "O.J., can I have your phone number to call you back? I have to go pick up my husband, and if I'm late, he'll kill me."

She apologized after an awkward pause, one of the few times the mile-a-minute talk show host has been at a loss for words.

In her about-to-be-released book "My Turn at the Bully Pulpit," Van Susteren, 49, recounts her rise from loudmouth lawyer to plastic-surgery cover girl to cable news queen. Since defecting from CNN to Fox News last year, the former adjunct professor at Georgetown Law School has parlayed a no-nonsense interviewing style into a ratings bonanza, making her the most popular woman on prime-time cable.

But for all her success, Van Susteren says over a Diet Coke in her North Capitol Street office, she doesn't feel like a star and isn't sure how many more years she'll be on the air.

"I never thought of myself as a TV person," she says. "The shelf life of women on TV I didn't think was particularly long. I never thought it was forever. I still don't. I love my job, but it's a very fickle business."

Despite her Nielsens success -- her "On the Record" show drew an average of 1.07 million viewers in May, June and July, compared with 598,000 for CNN, 221,000 for MSNBC and 168,000 for CNBC -- Van Susteren doesn't spew opinions like her colleagues Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scott Peterson admits knowledge of wife

Scott Peterson admits knowledge of wife

MODESTO, Calif., Aug. 24 (UPI) -- Accused wife-killer Scott Peterson is reported to have admitted knowledge of his pregnant wife's disappearance in a taped conversation.

Fox News quoted sources close to the case saying during a taped phone call between Peterson and his girlfriend Amber Frey, Frey asked whether he'd had anything to do with Laci Peterson's disappearance.

Peterson reponded, according to the Fox report: "Yes ... uh ... uh ... but no. But I know who did and I'll tell you later when I see you."

According to Fox, this was the first public suggestion Peterson initially admitted playing a role in his wife's abduction.

Laci, 27, disappeared on Christmas Eve from the Petersons' Modesto home, a little over a month before she was scheduled to give birth to the couple's first child.

Her body and that of her unborn son washed ashore along San Francisco .......

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 next last
To: runningbear; RGSpincich
I too am curious about what RG has to say about these tidbits.
101 posted on 08/28/2003 3:37:47 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
I simply can't wait to hear the "theory du jour."
102 posted on 08/28/2003 3:39:24 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Tombolo
Indeed
103 posted on 08/28/2003 3:40:05 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: MaggieMay
Thanks Maggie!
104 posted on 08/28/2003 3:40:51 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
My pleasure
105 posted on 08/28/2003 3:41:37 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper; Jackie-O
The NE drug article was from August 28th. It's the one on the newstands now with "Babs" plastic surgery article.
106 posted on 08/28/2003 3:43:17 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: MaggieMay
Yes, I'm okay Maggie. But is my city (Kelowna) that has 1/3rd of its' residents either evacuated or burned out. 248 homes burned to the ground. Actually they almost vaporized. I am on the opposite side of the valley across the lake and the site was something I will never see again. We stood on our deck with a telescope and could see the whole thing. We could see individual houses leveled in minutes. The entire sky and hillside was RED. If you want to see some amazing pics go to my homepage: www.Castanet.net. Just find the pictures that were taken by lots of people from many different vantage points.
107 posted on 08/28/2003 4:02:50 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Jackie I don't think the Prelim will be delayed. Geragos asked for that before and Girolami said NO!! I'm interested in what, if anything, the Defense can show in the of "real proof" on September 2nd!
108 posted on 08/28/2003 4:12:34 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
In court papers, Brazelton said, "Cameras in the court might expose the identities of undercover investigators."

The investigator told The ENQUIRER, " You don't need undercover detectives in a homicide investigation. You use undercover investigators in a narcotics investigation."

I have to take these stories in chronological order to come to any conclusion. Wonder who the "family friend" is, that is beginning to talk about a drug connection? Would this person not be a witness in a capital murder case, especially about Laci's concerns about the lavish spending? Direct quotes from Brazelton? We've been looking to the NE for reporting for months--are we now supposed to think that their stories are bogus? Something ain't right here, as we say in the south. I'm really beginning to wonder why the Sept. 9th article comes to the forefront at the same time we're beginning to look at the Aug. 28th article. Also, the media is beginning to push the People's article. I'm feeling like we're being jerked around.

109 posted on 08/28/2003 4:19:17 PM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
"Laci said she was shocked when she learned that Scott had bought a boat," said the family friend.

Up until now the story was that Laci had no idea that SP had bought a boat. He was going to surprise her with it on Christmas, isn't that what he told Diane Sawyer?

The drug stuff makes about as much sense as anything else he's done, so it could be true.

110 posted on 08/28/2003 4:37:37 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
could explain his luxury lifestyle and there was no evidence Scott was living beyond his means. Right!

Living beyond his means and living off ill-gotten gains are two different things. There still is no evidence that his finances were strained. House remains unattached by non-mortgage creditors and only a first loan exists on the property. Property taxes have been paid as required.

111 posted on 08/28/2003 4:46:31 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Comment #112 Removed by Moderator

To: Canadian Outrage
I hope it's not delayed Lynn! I don't think I could stand it!!! ;0)
113 posted on 08/28/2003 5:14:22 PM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse; maggie mae
Dev, Maggs...check your mail! ;0)
114 posted on 08/28/2003 5:20:59 PM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Tombolo
He sure did alot of spending before the murder...not only did he spend alot of time with his new girlfriend, he purchased a $25,000 membership at a country club and purchased a boat without his wife's knowlege??
115 posted on 08/28/2003 5:24:52 PM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Tombolo
Yep, he paid cash for his boat. $1,400. according to most reports.
116 posted on 08/28/2003 5:25:06 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
According to Dr. Gregory Schmunk, the chief medical examiner-coroner for California's Santa Clara County, the most straightforward explanation is that Laci's decomposing body caused Conner to be forced out. "As the decomposition occurs, the abdominal wall breaks down and eventually the baby is expelled right through the abdominal wall," says Schmunk. "That would explain why Conner is less decomposed than Laci, because Conner was in a protected uterine environment for quite some time prior to being expelled." From that point, he continues, "the baby could have easily been entangled in the tape that was surrounding Laci."

Makes sense to me. The other guy, Nordby, seems to trying out for a spot on the Peterson defense.

117 posted on 08/28/2003 5:40:55 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
Laci still had her uterus but there was an opening near the top part of it. Her cervix was "intact and closed." This means the unborn child did not emerge from the birth canal but from that opening near the top of the uterus," said Dr. Spitz.

Great stuff, Vel. If this autopsy information is accurate, I hear Don Meredith in the background singing SP's soon to be theme song.

118 posted on 08/28/2003 5:54:15 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
The Death Certificate only contains the cause of death which was deemed a homocide. The particulars were not able to be determined according to reports. My copy of the DC is still at the Health Dept. At the time, it was not part of the public record and it had to be obtained directly from the HD. I couldn't bring myself to drive out there (Martinez) and pick it up. Felt like it would be intruding, can't believe I even considered it.
119 posted on 08/28/2003 6:04:42 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
thanks, I wouldn't feel like you are intruding... just it is the public's curiosity at stake here... And Geragos to lose!!! ;o)
120 posted on 08/28/2003 6:09:09 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson