Skip to comments.254 'boy words'
Posted on 08/26/2003 7:53:07 PM PDT by GrandMoM
Tuesday, November 14, 2000 254 'boy words'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: The following column contains content of a sexual nature that some readers may find objectionable.
Those debating whether homosexuals should be scout leaders should take a look at the dictionary to help decide whether or not homosexuals have an inordinate interest in young boys. Or is it really as gay rights leaders say -- they just labor in young boys' best interests. Let's look it up and see if pederasts (men who sexually assault boys) comprise just a small cadre within the much larger male homosexual population.
The dictionary I am talking about is not in your local library. There, molester may be the only word "straights" would think of for men who sexually assault boys. No, I am talking about "The Queens' Vernacular" (QV), which is advertised as, "Everyman's dictionary to the gay underworld" and the "current language of a very large group of people who are members (part or full-time) of the homosexual community." In the QV there are 254 words for boys, most of these involve men sexually abusing boys.
Think about it. A dictionary has many words with subtle nuances for that which is important and fewer words for the obvious or trivial. Noah Webster collected 12,000 new words describing the governmental differences between America and Britain for his 1828 American Dictionary, which displaced Johnson's English dictionary. In "The Queens' Vernacular," anthropologist Bruce Rodgers also collected 12,000 words which describe the essential differences between "gays" and "straights." Yes Virginia, gays have their own 12,000 word dictionary because "straight" language cannot describe their world. It is really that different.
When homosexuals debate Boy Scouts they mean something very different than those relying on Webster's dictionary. According to Rodgers' authoritative homophile lexicon, "Boy Scout" and "boys" are defined in the following ways:
Boy-scout queen: (sexually experimenting boy scouts who fear giving a response); one who pretends to snooze as he is f---ed or s---ed off.
But, is QV an esoteric, unknown vocabulary? Here is what homophile leaders have to say. The 420 page "Long Road To Freedom: The Advocate History of the Gay and Lesbian Movement" (1994) reports that:
The Queens' Vernacular ... firmly remains a form of homosexual slang. ... To gay men ... something of a secret code ... in a hostile culture (emphasis added).
Writing in his anthology of homosexual "dictionaries and glossaries," Wayne Dynes, editor in chief of the "Encyclopedia of Homosexuality," notes that QV is the foremost gay lexicon, "reissued without change as Gaytalk." "The Joys of Gay Sex" authors Silverstein and White and Dennis Altman in "The Homosexualization of America" say amen to that! Rodgers writes that his microcultural analysis required:
years of interviews with hundreds of informants ... revealing the common speech of a traditionally oppressed minority. ... It is a book about words ... agreed-upon symbols for recognizing things and actions. ... We use words to give expression to our thoughts about our experience. ... The Queens' Vernacular demonstrates the imagination, subtlety, humor, self-pity and downright masochism with which gay people have forged the common language into a means of communicating their experience.
These authors happened upon QV while conducting research on "Partner Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of Male Sexual Orientation" (Judith Reisman and Charles Johnson, 1995). So what are some uniquely gay words for boys? Well remember this; boys are the largest -- most important -- thematic category in the QV/"Gaytalk." Following is a small sample of the 254 "gay" words for boys, described as "chicken." Chicken is the primary QV term; it clearly implies that boys are for consumption:
Chicken: a young recruit; any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair of face and unfamiliar with homosexuality. Freshly killed: (butchered) recently introduced to a-- f---ing. "See how bowlegged that chicken walks -- looks like he was freshly killed in the hayloft."
Pluck some feathers: rip off a drumstick; skin some chicken.
Head and heels: describing physical allurement, despite extreme youth, but too young or small to know what to do in bed: he must be helped by someone more experienced who will clasp the boy by his head and heels to lift him onto the c---.
Jail tail: any boy below the age of consent with whom sex merits a stretch in the pen.
Egg: a male child too young to be sexually developed and therefore considered neuter. Syn: bibette; peepee meat; yo-yo. Related terms: egg-sucker, a cradle robber; man who likes very young boys. Syn: peepee lover. ... "Anything older than ten is over the hill to a peepee lover". ... "(R)eady to crack open," said of a boy on the verge of puberty. Also see chicken.
Cupcake: young girlish boy, though not necessarily gay ... cupcakes; small but rounded buttocks, most temptingly found on narrow hipped boys. Syn: English Muffins; hone rolls; hot cross buns; rounders. "Ask that kid with the rounders if he'd be interested in joining in an ancient Greek initiation rite."
Bait: attractive, young male in league with the police or criminal element to entrap homosexuals into performing an act of sex in a public place. "Be careful of that tearoom ... there's usually some bait positioned around the throne-room."
Benny house bordello: featuring young boys for its homosexual customers. Syn: boy's smoking house; fag factory, flower house ... sugar loaf; a kept boy; sugar babe, talent; young attractive boys; talent scout, person recruiting what he considers promising young boys.
Peter Pan: 1. superboy; 2. young hustler who charges an arm and leg for f---ing; 3. a winsome boy hired to act as bait to entrap prominent homosexuals. Syn: worm for the hook.
Poultry dealer: man who pimps boys to interested homosexuals. ...
Professional guest: kept boy who doesn't put out for his host. Syn: fresh fruit; freshly butchered; freshly killed; fresh meat; fresh one; fresh piece; fried chicken f---ing boy; gay lad; gay milk bar; half-boy; kept boy; rent boy; roundeye (if the lad is still a virgin, anally, he is called a kewpie doll); punk; gal-boy; girl-boy; green boy; kid; pussy boy; sex boy; youngster to be active in force-f---ng; to emasculate another man figuratively, etc.; praising a young, little, firm body, "I did this hitchhiker I picked up -- he sure was a cute, little, tight thing."
Sexteenager: young man who tries out homosexuality, see chicken. Syn: come-on boy; decoy(er); fairy hawk ... angel with a dirty face; babette; baby; baby buggy; baby butch; baby Crockett; baby discovers; baby paste; baggage-boy; bait; bait the hook ... Barbie dogs; young action; young enough to get under the gate ... youngster ... young stuff, youthos.
And on and on, for over a hundred more such terms. This lingo is absent from all normal national dictionaries -- for now. And, no Virginia, affectionate, non-sexual or helpful words for boys did not exist. It is fair to say that Rodger's 12,000 word QV lexicon supports Webster's statement -- that language grows among the common people, and that it is the common language which most accurately describes that group's beliefs, conduct, hopes, legal and political aspirations.
In 1828, Webster explained his "new vocabulary directly reflected the American philosophy of government ... (t)he Christian concept of individual liberty and property established under the Constitution." So too is Rodger's "new vocabulary directly related to the (homosexual) philosophy of government." In 254 words, this "traditionally oppressed minority" would legalize access to any age boys ("chickens") for sex.
So, the homosexual view of "life, individual liberty and property" is radically subversive of the document known as the Declaration of Independence. The QV should inform the debate on the Boy Scouts, age of consent, affectional and sexual orientation and a wide array of "gay" programs which would eliminate the constraints of American law. As in "The U.N. Rights of the Child," sexual psychopathic zealots would have children become free agents, emancipated from their parents' legal protections and controls. This was exactly what Alfred C. Kinsey, the father of the sexual and gay rights revolutions, planned to occur in the second half of the 20th century.
Let's come to terms in the debate. Look it up! Go get the homosexual dictionary and really learn what homosexual leaders -- including legislators, judges, prosecuting attorneys -- mean when they use their 12,000 word "secret code" among themselves. The real "gay" language exposes the well-hidden, vulnerable underbelly of the homosexual political agenda. As parents' rights to rear and protect their children are destroyed to make room for more and more homosexual "civil rights," these sexual revolutionaries celebrate, making their way, classroom by classroom, toward legal access to all our children.
Hey, don't blame us, we just read the dictionary.
Dr. Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education in Crestwood, Ky., is the author of "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences," the second edition of which is available at the WND storefront).
Eunice Van Winkle Ray is president of RSVP America.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16461
C'mon GrandMoM, who are we to judge? Everyone knows all cultures and subgroups are of equal value in this wonderfully diverse world of ours (/sarcasm)
Scripter will be off line occasionally between now and the middle of September. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.
|Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links|
|Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)|
|Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search|
|All FreeRepublic Bump Lists|
A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.
....not only by psychologists, our churches, schools, media, local and Federal Government too
. I read an article just last week that stated the article in the AMA stating that homosexuality was not a mental illness, was done by psychologists who's own reputations were at stake. In other words, they were gay or very sympathatic to the gay agenda!
or would that be way too politically incorrect? ....$crew politically incorrect, I'm sick of it, that's what got this country in the mess it is in!!!!!!!!
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Most important point made in the article.
and here is one of the sickest names in the article "Boy-scout queen: (sexually experimenting boy scouts who fear giving a response); one who pretends to snooze as he is f---ed or s---ed off."....it makes my stomach turn.
ARE YOU SERIOUS?????????????????????????
The governor gets a steady stream of homo issues to sign or veto in every legislative session ever since they elected four of their own to the legislature. There are efforts under way to expand homo-recruiting in schools, legalize gay marriage, force Christian foster parents to teach that perverison is normal and natural, the list goes on and on...
Arnold's views on this are very, very relevant, no matter what talking points his campaign is circulating.
I'll tell you what is inducing illness in me, so many Starry eyed dreams who don't understand WHY we are Republicans selling out for the "sure thing" in order to get power, but its just creating a second liberal political party.
At what level do you stop supporting him because of the issues he HAS taken and stop caring about the power you THINK he will give you?
....and those voting for Arnold are going to let it happen!!!!
Can you catch it? I think that hated word SIN might describe it better.
You don't cite specifically where Arnold has stated such; not only that, you don't give the man an opportunity to address the issue either. It's far easier to beat him over the head in order to diminish him and promote your candidate - whoever that might be.
I've got no horse in this race since I live in Georgia, but I certainly would prefer that we play fair as opposed to wallowing in tactics that are more akin to what you would see on DU.
Blood splatter: All that will remain of these morons if they come within the same area code as my son.
If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
....can't stand the truth of the moral decay that is trying to distroy this country and the fact that some here on FR are part of it??
Barney Frank....white courtesy phone
Davis has already signed the "transgendered rights bill" that allows for anyone to cross dress in the workplace. The legislation says that anyone dressing for their perceived gender cannot be fired.
Therefore Drag Queens, as long as they meet the standards of dress for women, cannot be fired or made to dress like men. And visa-versa for women.
This is the downside of the Arnold agenda...
According to Lifesite, a Nov. 18, 2002 Associated Press article reported that Schwarzenegger describes himself as "very liberal" on social issues and that "He favors legalized abortion
and gay adoption".
Can you catch it? I think that hated word SIN might describe it better.
....I read an article (?) where a psychologist said homosexuals have no conscience, thus they do not see it as a sin!!!!
The old thread? No, I know of it. But there is nowhere in this article here that notes Arnold. Only your assertions in your notes connect him.
Like I said, it's far easier to beat the man over the head than to use the articles directly.
These are tactics that I would expect from DU. I have always thought better of FReepers.
It really doesn't matter how THEY see it. Whether something is a sin is not determined by how we feel about it. What matters is what God says about it.
.....sometimes in life you get sour grapes!
....I sent you the link, get over it!!!!!!!!
I agree with you, but look around -- they're already there.
So much for rational discourse. I obviously made a mistake in thinking I could engage in such with you.
Homosexuals (and libertines/libertarians) claim that this act is committed in private between consenting adults. This is not always the case and it is deceitful to claim so. We are aware of "cruising" in parks and public restrooms (heterosexuals don't go hunting for anonymous free public sex, someone may pay for a prostitute but there isn't a heterosexual "cruising" culture). Even in "private" you will find more gay bathhouses than you will "swingers nightclubs". We are also aware that the age of consent is not always 18 (meaning that non-adults can consent to this act). We also know that not all participants consent to this act (some are too young to defend themselves).
Have to wonder how many anti-heterosexual terms there are in that dictionary. We know "homophobe" (disgust does not equal fear; if ths suffix must stand, a truer term would be "homosexualphobe"). We also know "breeder". "Hate speech" seems to be a one way street.
We know that there are skeletons in the closet of this movement that is seeking public acceptance. How about an open airing of the facts of what we are being asked to tolerate/legalize?
The press would have a field day if a fraternity or group of cadets were circulating a dictionary with some phrases for date rape. Something to call "making it" with a girl when she's passed out from too much beer and qualudes.
Have to wonder if they blame the victim in the "alterboys vow of silence" too.
This certainly could be said about Kinsey.
This certainly could be said about Kinsey. Putting Kinsey in charge of sex and Dr. Spock in charge of child raising is kind of like letting the middle eastern nations be in charge of human rights panels at the UN.
My statement does not necessarily apply to the Arnold for/against discourse in this thread. It applies to FR in general. I understand there are Libertarians on FR. I understand that there are atheists on FR. I understand that there are homosexuals (or just those who claim to be heterosexuals but "friendly" to the homosexual movement) on FR. I understand that there are conservatives who are disappointed in President George W. Bush on FR.
I also know that there are some on FR who are RINO/CINO or DUh trolls masking as conservatives.
Free Republic has a good thing going. Other politically interested people are jealous. They don't understand FR just like they don't understand talk radio. We don't go to these sites/stations to hear the day's talking points. We go because we have found some people to discuss the day's events with who share many of the same values and positions. Hearing someone "inside" our sanctuary embrace a liberal concept will not do much to sway our support to their position. But they sure do try.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.