Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

254 'boy words'
World Net Daily ^ | 11/14/2000 | Dr. Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education

Posted on 08/26/2003 7:53:07 PM PDT by GrandMoM

Tuesday, November 14, 2000 254 'boy words'

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: The following column contains content of a sexual nature that some readers may find objectionable.

Those debating whether homosexuals should be scout leaders should take a look at the dictionary to help decide whether or not homosexuals have an inordinate interest in young boys. Or is it really as gay rights leaders say -- they just labor in young boys' best interests. Let's look it up and see if pederasts (men who sexually assault boys) comprise just a small cadre within the much larger male homosexual population.

The dictionary I am talking about is not in your local library. There, molester may be the only word "straights" would think of for men who sexually assault boys. No, I am talking about "The Queens' Vernacular" (QV), which is advertised as, "Everyman's dictionary to the gay underworld" and the "current language of a very large group of people who are members (part or full-time) of the homosexual community." In the QV there are 254 words for boys, most of these involve men sexually abusing boys.

Think about it. A dictionary has many words with subtle nuances for that which is important and fewer words for the obvious or trivial. Noah Webster collected 12,000 new words describing the governmental differences between America and Britain for his 1828 American Dictionary, which displaced Johnson's English dictionary. In "The Queens' Vernacular," anthropologist Bruce Rodgers also collected 12,000 words which describe the essential differences between "gays" and "straights." Yes Virginia, gays have their own 12,000 word dictionary because "straight" language cannot describe their world. It is really that different.

When homosexuals debate Boy Scouts they mean something very different than those relying on Webster's dictionary. According to Rodgers' authoritative homophile lexicon, "Boy Scout" and "boys" are defined in the following ways:

Boy-scout queen: (sexually experimenting boy scouts who fear giving a response); one who pretends to snooze as he is f---ed or s---ed off.

But, is QV an esoteric, unknown vocabulary? Here is what homophile leaders have to say. The 420 page "Long Road To Freedom: The Advocate History of the Gay and Lesbian Movement" (1994) reports that:

The Queens' Vernacular ... firmly remains a form of homosexual slang. ... To gay men ... something of a secret code ... in a hostile culture (emphasis added).

Writing in his anthology of homosexual "dictionaries and glossaries," Wayne Dynes, editor in chief of the "Encyclopedia of Homosexuality," notes that QV is the foremost gay lexicon, "reissued without change as Gaytalk." "The Joys of Gay Sex" authors Silverstein and White and Dennis Altman in "The Homosexualization of America" say amen to that! Rodgers writes that his microcultural analysis required:

years of interviews with hundreds of informants ... revealing the common speech of a traditionally oppressed minority. ... It is a book about words ... agreed-upon symbols for recognizing things and actions. ... We use words to give expression to our thoughts about our experience. ... The Queens' Vernacular demonstrates the imagination, subtlety, humor, self-pity and downright masochism with which gay people have forged the common language into a means of communicating their experience.

These authors happened upon QV while conducting research on "Partner Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of Male Sexual Orientation" (Judith Reisman and Charles Johnson, 1995). So what are some uniquely gay words for boys? Well remember this; boys are the largest -- most important -- thematic category in the QV/"Gaytalk." Following is a small sample of the 254 "gay" words for boys, described as "chicken." Chicken is the primary QV term; it clearly implies that boys are for consumption:

Chicken: a young recruit; any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair of face and unfamiliar with homosexuality. Freshly killed: (butchered) recently introduced to a-- f---ing. "See how bowlegged that chicken walks -- looks like he was freshly killed in the hayloft."

Pluck some feathers: rip off a drumstick; skin some chicken.

Head and heels: describing physical allurement, despite extreme youth, but too young or small to know what to do in bed: he must be helped by someone more experienced who will clasp the boy by his head and heels to lift him onto the c---.

Jail tail: any boy below the age of consent with whom sex merits a stretch in the pen.

Egg: a male child too young to be sexually developed and therefore considered neuter. Syn: bibette; peepee meat; yo-yo. Related terms: egg-sucker, a cradle robber; man who likes very young boys. Syn: peepee lover. ... "Anything older than ten is over the hill to a peepee lover". ... "(R)eady to crack open," said of a boy on the verge of puberty. Also see chicken.

Cupcake: young girlish boy, though not necessarily gay ... cupcakes; small but rounded buttocks, most temptingly found on narrow hipped boys. Syn: English Muffins; hone rolls; hot cross buns; rounders. "Ask that kid with the rounders if he'd be interested in joining in an ancient Greek initiation rite."

Bait: attractive, young male in league with the police or criminal element to entrap homosexuals into performing an act of sex in a public place. "Be careful of that tearoom ... there's usually some bait positioned around the throne-room."

Benny house bordello: featuring young boys for its homosexual customers. Syn: boy's smoking house; fag factory, flower house ... sugar loaf; a kept boy; sugar babe, talent; young attractive boys; talent scout, person recruiting what he considers promising young boys.

Peter Pan: 1. superboy; 2. young hustler who charges an arm and leg for f---ing; 3. a winsome boy hired to act as bait to entrap prominent homosexuals. Syn: worm for the hook.

Poultry dealer: man who pimps boys to interested homosexuals. ...

Professional guest: kept boy who doesn't put out for his host. Syn: fresh fruit; freshly butchered; freshly killed; fresh meat; fresh one; fresh piece; fried chicken f---ing boy; gay lad; gay milk bar; half-boy; kept boy; rent boy; roundeye (if the lad is still a virgin, anally, he is called a kewpie doll); punk; gal-boy; girl-boy; green boy; kid; pussy boy; sex boy; youngster to be active in force-f---ng; to emasculate another man figuratively, etc.; praising a young, little, firm body, "I did this hitchhiker I picked up -- he sure was a cute, little, tight thing."

Sexteenager: young man who tries out homosexuality, see chicken. Syn: come-on boy; decoy(er); fairy hawk ... angel with a dirty face; babette; baby; baby buggy; baby butch; baby Crockett; baby discovers; baby paste; baggage-boy; bait; bait the hook ... Barbie dogs; young action; young enough to get under the gate ... youngster ... young stuff, youthos.

And on and on, for over a hundred more such terms. This lingo is absent from all normal national dictionaries -- for now. And, no Virginia, affectionate, non-sexual or helpful words for boys did not exist. It is fair to say that Rodger's 12,000 word QV lexicon supports Webster's statement -- that language grows among the common people, and that it is the common language which most accurately describes that group's beliefs, conduct, hopes, legal and political aspirations.

In 1828, Webster explained his "new vocabulary directly reflected the American philosophy of government ... (t)he Christian concept of individual liberty and property established under the Constitution." So too is Rodger's "new vocabulary directly related to the (homosexual) philosophy of government." In 254 words, this "traditionally oppressed minority" would legalize access to any age boys ("chickens") for sex.

So, the homosexual view of "life, individual liberty and property" is radically subversive of the document known as the Declaration of Independence. The QV should inform the debate on the Boy Scouts, age of consent, affectional and sexual orientation and a wide array of "gay" programs which would eliminate the constraints of American law. As in "The U.N. Rights of the Child," sexual psychopathic zealots would have children become free agents, emancipated from their parents' legal protections and controls. This was exactly what Alfred C. Kinsey, the father of the sexual and gay rights revolutions, planned to occur in the second half of the 20th century.

Let's come to terms in the debate. Look it up! Go get the homosexual dictionary and really learn what homosexual leaders -- including legislators, judges, prosecuting attorneys -- mean when they use their 12,000 word "secret code" among themselves. The real "gay" language exposes the well-hidden, vulnerable underbelly of the homosexual political agenda. As parents' rights to rear and protect their children are destroyed to make room for more and more homosexual "civil rights," these sexual revolutionaries celebrate, making their way, classroom by classroom, toward legal access to all our children.

Hey, don't blame us, we just read the dictionary.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education in Crestwood, Ky., is the author of "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences," the second edition of which is available at the WND storefront).

Eunice Van Winkle Ray is president of RSVP America.

To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16461


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aclu; ageofconsent; ambush; analsex; arnold; boylovers; boys; boyscouts; chickenhawks; childabuse; childmolestors; childrapists; children; childsex; childsexualabuse; clintonlegacy; closet; culture; culturewar; deviance; deviants; downourthroats; freespeech; gatewaysexact; gayadoption; gayscoutleaders; gayscouts; glossary; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualsandboys; homosexualslang; itsjustsex; jailbait; judithreisman; language; lewinsky; manboylove; molestation; molestors; nambla; oralsex; pervertedperverts; perverts; prisoners; progayarnold; pubescentsex; queensenglish; queensvernacular; scoutleaders; scouttroops; selfdefense; sex; sexualabuse; sexualizingchildren; slang; sodom; sodomites; sodomizers; sodomy; statoryrape; teensex; twinks
Arnold backers: SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? Arnold says yes -- do you agree?,
1 posted on 08/26/2003 7:53:08 PM PDT by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
I think a better qustion should be, should the mental illness known as homosexuality be once again recognized by psychologists as a disorder, or would that be way too politically incorrect?
2 posted on 08/26/2003 8:04:19 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
In "The Queens' Vernacular," anthropologist Bruce Rodgers also collected 12,000 words which describe the essential differences between "gays" and "straights." Yes Virginia, gays have their own 12,000 word dictionary because "straight" language cannot describe their world. It is really that different.

C'mon GrandMoM, who are we to judge? Everyone knows all cultures and subgroups are of equal value in this wonderfully diverse world of ours (/sarcasm)

3 posted on 08/26/2003 8:06:36 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (20 years in the Navy; never drunk on duty - never sober on liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM; scripter; *Homosexual Agenda; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Bump and ping

Scripter will be off line occasionally between now and the middle of September. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.

4 posted on 08/26/2003 8:13:41 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
I think a better qustion should be, should the mental illness known as homosexuality be once again recognized by psychologists as a disorder,

....not only by psychologists, our churches, schools, media, local and Federal Government too

. I read an article just last week that stated the article in the AMA stating that homosexuality was not a mental illness, was done by psychologists who's own reputations were at stake. In other words, they were gay or very sympathatic to the gay agenda!

or would that be way too politically incorrect? ....$crew politically incorrect, I'm sick of it, that's what got this country in the mess it is in!!!!!!!!

5 posted on 08/26/2003 8:29:13 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
BTTT and thanks for the info!!!!
6 posted on 08/26/2003 8:41:01 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
BLEEECCCHHH bump.
7 posted on 08/26/2003 8:57:05 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("Helen Thomas, I've got a question for you: Just how many cats do you own now?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
BLEEECCCHHH bump.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

8 posted on 08/26/2003 9:28:05 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
. And, no Virginia, affectionate, non-sexual or helpful words for boys did not exist.

Most important point made in the article.

9 posted on 08/26/2003 9:40:13 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
And, no Virginia, affectionate, non-sexual or helpful words for boys did not exist. Most important point made in the article.

and here is one of the sickest names in the article "Boy-scout queen: (sexually experimenting boy scouts who fear giving a response); one who pretends to snooze as he is f---ed or s---ed off."....it makes my stomach turn.

10 posted on 08/26/2003 9:50:44 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Made me sick to my stomach, and if we don't agree with Arnold, no reason not to support him. The governor has no say on social issues.
11 posted on 08/26/2003 10:42:14 PM PDT by hasegawasama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
This is a good point:
I have a friend who at one time (mid eighties) was studying in England. Staunch catholic background but international up-bringing etc.
Well one morning he called a psychiatrist got an appontment, walked in and announced:
"I believe I have contracted homosexuality, can you cure me?"
The doctor almost fell off his chair of course. Tried to convince my friend homesexuality was not a disease.
My friend changed shrink.
This happened three times.
Finally a doctor agreed to 'cure' him.
He went into therapy for six or seven years.
He is now happily married and is very well-blanced and a truly positive person.
When discussions turn to gay rights etc. he tells his story, and always says this sentance: "The fact that it is a sexual urge, instead of a fever or sore, makes it no less a disease. It is a disorder due to various problems which can be solved. The point is to have the strength to say to your self in the mirror: I am a sick man and need help."
12 posted on 08/27/2003 1:29:25 AM PDT by Ippolita (Si vis pacem para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
The gay crusaders here really need their own wing of the Smokey Backroom.
13 posted on 08/27/2003 3:09:33 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hasegawasama; BlackElk; TheAngryClam; churchillbuff; ElkGroveDan; Gophack; kellynla; ...
Made me sick to my stomach, and if we don't agree with Arnold, no reason not to support him. The governor has no say on social issues.

ARE YOU SERIOUS?????????????????????????

The governor gets a steady stream of homo issues to sign or veto in every legislative session ever since they elected four of their own to the legislature. There are efforts under way to expand homo-recruiting in schools, legalize gay marriage, force Christian foster parents to teach that perverison is normal and natural, the list goes on and on...

Arnold's views on this are very, very relevant, no matter what talking points his campaign is circulating.

14 posted on 08/27/2003 10:32:43 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; Grampa Dave
The stronghold of conservatism called FreeRepublic.com has been breached... BIGTIME!!!
15 posted on 08/27/2003 10:38:35 AM PDT by SierraWasp (You are watching the Liberal monopolized California government collapse on it's own folly!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hasegawasama
Made me sick to my stomach, and if we don't agree with Arnold

I'll tell you what is inducing illness in me, so many Starry eyed dreams who don't understand WHY we are Republicans selling out for the "sure thing" in order to get power, but its just creating a second liberal political party.

At what level do you stop supporting him because of the issues he HAS taken and stop caring about the power you THINK he will give you?

16 posted on 08/27/2003 10:39:32 AM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
From what I understand the Dimwit Davis plans to sign into law if he hasn't already... the homosexual adoption law... Well that's just the kind of upbringing I would want to be raised in...yea these Aunold fan club members just don't get it! Liberals don't change their spots by changing their party affiliation! And BTW the 11th commandment does not apply to just anyone who adds an "R" to the back of their name. A "pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, pro-gun control and pro-government paid for by the taxpayer program" liberal is hardly one who qualifies as Republican! The 11th commandment didn't apply to David Duke and it doesn't apply to Aunold! And this social liberal/fiscal conservative label is bogus. You can't pay for government social programs and be a fiscal conservative! PERIOD!
17 posted on 08/27/2003 10:57:44 AM PDT by kellynla (USMC SEMPER FI! VOTE4MCCLINTOCK...or pay the con$equence$! http://www.tommcclintock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Gross! I couldn't finish reading the article, but the "definitions" show how perverted their minds are. It seems that the men are interested in violating innocent boy victims and converting them to the disease of homosexuality.
18 posted on 08/27/2003 11:12:33 AM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
From what I understand the Dimwit Davis plans to sign into law if he hasn't already... the homosexual adoption law... Well that's just the kind of upbringing I would want to be raised in...yea these Aunold fan club members just don't get it! Liberals don't change their spots by changing their party affiliation! And BTW the 11th commandment does not apply to just anyone who adds an "R" to the back of their name. A "pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, pro-gun control and pro-government paid for by the taxpayer program" liberal is hardly one who qualifies as Republican! The 11th commandment didn't apply to David Duke and it doesn't apply to Aunold! And this social liberal/fiscal conservative label is bogus. You can't pay for government social programs and be a fiscal conservative! PERIOD....you got that right!!!!
19 posted on 08/27/2003 11:28:49 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: heleny
Gross! I couldn't finish reading the article, but the "definitions" show how perverted their minds are. It seems that the men are interested in violating innocent boy victims and converting them to the disease of homosexuality.....YEP!

....and those voting for Arnold are going to let it happen!!!!

20 posted on 08/27/2003 11:31:14 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: heleny
disease of homosexuality

Can you catch it? I think that hated word SIN might describe it better.

21 posted on 08/27/2003 11:35:22 AM PDT by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM; Admin Moderator
"Arnold backers?" - So is this yet another hit piece for the Arnold bashers? No, this looks like a legitimate piece that doesn't mention Schwarzenegger anywhere, but yet you use it as a club. Those who are supporting Arnold aren't using these tactics that are straight out of the Democratic playbook; why must we resort to such tactics?

You don't cite specifically where Arnold has stated such; not only that, you don't give the man an opportunity to address the issue either. It's far easier to beat him over the head in order to diminish him and promote your candidate - whoever that might be.

I've got no horse in this race since I live in Georgia, but I certainly would prefer that we play fair as opposed to wallowing in tactics that are more akin to what you would see on DU.

22 posted on 08/27/2003 11:37:45 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Let me add a term -

Blood splatter: All that will remain of these morons if they come within the same area code as my son.

Just damn.

If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

23 posted on 08/27/2003 11:40:01 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
The gay crusaders here really need their own wing of the Smokey Backroom.....WHY?

....can't stand the truth of the moral decay that is trying to distroy this country and the fact that some here on FR are part of it??

24 posted on 08/27/2003 11:43:08 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Benny house bordello: featuring young boys for its homosexual customers.

Barney Frank....white courtesy phone

25 posted on 08/27/2003 11:45:35 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Hey Kelly and anyone else that is interested:

Davis has already signed the "transgendered rights bill" that allows for anyone to cross dress in the workplace. The legislation says that anyone dressing for their perceived gender cannot be fired.

Therefore Drag Queens, as long as they meet the standards of dress for women, cannot be fired or made to dress like men. And visa-versa for women.

This is the downside of the Arnold agenda...

DD

26 posted on 08/27/2003 11:49:43 AM PDT by DiamondDon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DiamondDon1
Did Davis sign the homosexual adoption bill too?
27 posted on 08/27/2003 11:52:35 AM PDT by kellynla (USMC SEMPER FI! VOTE4MCCLINTOCK...or pay the con$equence$! http://www.tommcclintock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mhking
You don't cite specifically where Arnold has stated such; not only that, you don't give the man an opportunity to address the issue either. It's far easier to beat him over the head in order to diminish him and promote your candidate - whoever that might be.....where have you been? Guess you missed this thread!!!!!

According to Lifesite, a Nov. 18, 2002 Associated Press article reported that Schwarzenegger describes himself as "very liberal" on social issues and that "He favors legalized abortion…and gay adoption".

28 posted on 08/27/2003 11:54:21 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
This is so sick.
29 posted on 08/27/2003 11:57:11 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
The stronghold of conservatism called FreeRepublic.com has been breached... BIGTIME!!!

Deserves repeating.

30 posted on 08/27/2003 11:59:48 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sangoo
disease of homosexuality

Can you catch it? I think that hated word SIN might describe it better.

....I read an article (?) where a psychologist said homosexuals have no conscience, thus they do not see it as a sin!!!!

31 posted on 08/27/2003 12:02:11 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
where have you been? Guess you missed this thread!

The old thread? No, I know of it. But there is nowhere in this article here that notes Arnold. Only your assertions in your notes connect him.

Like I said, it's far easier to beat the man over the head than to use the articles directly.

These are tactics that I would expect from DU. I have always thought better of FReepers.

32 posted on 08/27/2003 12:07:52 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
....I read an article (?) where a psychologist said homosexuals have no conscience, thus they do not see it as a sin!!!!

It really doesn't matter how THEY see it. Whether something is a sin is not determined by how we feel about it. What matters is what God says about it.

33 posted on 08/27/2003 12:09:19 PM PDT by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I have always thought better of FReepers

.....sometimes in life you get sour grapes!

....I sent you the link, get over it!!!!!!!!

34 posted on 08/27/2003 12:18:21 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Blood splatter: All that will remain of these morons if they come within the same area code as my son.

I agree with you, but look around -- they're already there.

35 posted on 08/27/2003 12:20:32 PM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
....I sent you the link, get over it!!!!!!!!

So much for rational discourse. I obviously made a mistake in thinking I could engage in such with you.

36 posted on 08/27/2003 12:21:42 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
OH.......I like your tag line!!!!!!
37 posted on 08/27/2003 12:22:35 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Until the homosexual movement confronts publicly the subset that is pushing for embracement of lower ages of consent, they will face the same PR battle that "peaceful" Islamists face.

Homosexuals (and libertines/libertarians) claim that this act is committed in private between consenting adults. This is not always the case and it is deceitful to claim so. We are aware of "cruising" in parks and public restrooms (heterosexuals don't go hunting for anonymous free public sex, someone may pay for a prostitute but there isn't a heterosexual "cruising" culture). Even in "private" you will find more gay bathhouses than you will "swingers nightclubs". We are also aware that the age of consent is not always 18 (meaning that non-adults can consent to this act). We also know that not all participants consent to this act (some are too young to defend themselves).

Have to wonder how many anti-heterosexual terms there are in that dictionary. We know "homophobe" (disgust does not equal fear; if ths suffix must stand, a truer term would be "homosexualphobe"). We also know "breeder". "Hate speech" seems to be a one way street.

We know that there are skeletons in the closet of this movement that is seeking public acceptance. How about an open airing of the facts of what we are being asked to tolerate/legalize?

38 posted on 08/27/2003 12:27:03 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee; GrandMoM; pram; scripter; Clint N. Suhks
Bump & Ping
39 posted on 08/27/2003 12:37:32 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
That phrase is an attempt to justify rape (non-consensual sex). "He was faking it that he was asleep."

The press would have a field day if a fraternity or group of cadets were circulating a dictionary with some phrases for date rape. Something to call "making it" with a girl when she's passed out from too much beer and qualudes.

Have to wonder if they blame the victim in the "alterboys vow of silence" too.

40 posted on 08/27/2003 12:37:47 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
I read an article just last week that stated the article in the AMA stating that homosexuality was not a mental illness, was done by psychologists who's own reputations were at stake. In other words, they were gay or very sympathatic to the gay agenda!

This certainly could be said about Kinsey.

41 posted on 08/27/2003 12:39:51 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
I read an article just last week that stated the article in the AMA stating that homosexuality was not a mental illness, was done by psychologists who's own reputations were at stake. In other words, they were gay or very sympathatic to the gay agenda!

This certainly could be said about Kinsey. Putting Kinsey in charge of sex and Dr. Spock in charge of child raising is kind of like letting the middle eastern nations be in charge of human rights panels at the UN.

42 posted on 08/27/2003 12:40:52 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weegee; GrandMoM
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3845df0f4235.htm#13
43 posted on 08/27/2003 12:43:34 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
The more exposure FR gets and the more "power" FR is perceived in having, the more fifth columnists that will be trolling on FR.

My statement does not necessarily apply to the Arnold for/against discourse in this thread. It applies to FR in general. I understand there are Libertarians on FR. I understand that there are atheists on FR. I understand that there are homosexuals (or just those who claim to be heterosexuals but "friendly" to the homosexual movement) on FR. I understand that there are conservatives who are disappointed in President George W. Bush on FR.

I also know that there are some on FR who are RINO/CINO or DUh trolls masking as conservatives.

Free Republic has a good thing going. Other politically interested people are jealous. They don't understand FR just like they don't understand talk radio. We don't go to these sites/stations to hear the day's talking points. We go because we have found some people to discuss the day's events with who share many of the same values and positions. Hearing someone "inside" our sanctuary embrace a liberal concept will not do much to sway our support to their position. But they sure do try.

44 posted on 08/27/2003 12:50:07 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: heleny
It's about indoctrination and impacting their sexual development. Many homosexuals had an "older" teacher.
45 posted on 08/27/2003 12:53:10 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Dan...don't forget my personal list:

All our (females) grief comes from words with men;

MENopause

MENstruation

HYSterectomy

MENtal Illness

HYSteria

MALEovelent

I guess it all comes down to HIStory ;)
46 posted on 08/27/2003 1:51:18 PM PDT by JustPiper ( "Free Republic" - The Greatest Information Truth Highway on the Internet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
....thanks for the post EdReform!
47 posted on 08/27/2003 1:56:56 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
This is absolutely revolting.
48 posted on 08/27/2003 2:03:48 PM PDT by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
"Blood splatter: All that will remain of these morons if they come within the same area code as my son."

OMG, I just saw this....

I feel EXACTLY the same. This is truly sick. Thanks for the ping, by the way. :)
49 posted on 09/11/2003 5:34:29 PM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson