Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Looks to Stem Manufacturing Job Loss
AP ^ | 9/1/2003 | SCOTT LINDLAW

Posted on 09/01/2003 12:33:45 PM PDT by sixmil

On a rain-soaked Labor Day trip to a factory training center, Bush said he had directed Commerce Secretary Don Evans to establish an assistant position to focus "on the needs of manufacturers." Keeping factory jobs is critical to a broader economic recovery, the president said, his outdoor venue ringed by cranes, backhoes and bulldozers.

Bush said the nation has lost "thousands of jobs in manufacturing." In fact, the losses have soared into the millions: Of the 2.7 million jobs the U.S. economy has lost since the recession began in early 2001, 2.4 million were in manufacturing. The downturn has eliminated more than one in 10 of the nation's factory jobs.

The president attributed the erosion to productivity gains and to jobs flowing to cheaper labor markets overseas. He suggested that jobs moving to foreign shores was his primary reason for creating the new manufacturing czar.

"One way to make sure that the manufacturing sector does well is to send a message overseas, (to) say, look, we expect there to be a fair playing field when it comes to trade," Bush said.

"See, we in America believe we can compete with anybody, just so long as the rules are fair, and we intend to keep the rules fair," Bush said, his audience of workers and supporters cheering.

Bush administration officials believe one way to spark the economy and deal with the bloated trade deficit is for other countries to remove trade barriers. That would allow U.S. companies to more freely do business in overseas markets, boosting America's global competitiveness. The nation's trade deficit ran at an annual rate of $488.5 billion for the first six months of this year, heading for another record.

Congress approved pacts with Singapore and Chile earlier this year, and the administration says it now is striving for an agreement for all of Central America.

Bush did not name the new manufacturing official, and gave no timetable for offering a nomination to the Senate. Nor did he specify what duties the new post would include.

He spent most of his speech expressing empathy for anxious workers, and wiping rain from his head, which became thoroughly drenched despite his union hat.

"I want you to understand that I understand that Ohio manufacturers are hurting, that there's a problem with the manufacturing sector," Bush said. "I understand that for a full recovery, to make sure people can find work, that manufacturing must do better," Bush said.

Ohio lost 185,000 jobs during the recession from 2001 through last March, nearly two-thirds in manufacturing, according to a study released Sunday by a private economic think tank.

Politics loomed large in Bush's 11th trip to Ohio — a state he carried in 2000, and one where he also spent the July Fourth holiday.

Monday, Bush brought along his chief political adviser, Karl Rove, for the half-day trip to address the International Union of Operating Engineers, which represents 400,000 construction and maintenance workers in the United States and Canada.

Bush has tried to woo some trade and industrial unions, which tend to be more conservative than public and service sector unions. The Operating Engineers union is among the largest labor donors to Republicans, contributing 16 percent of its $1.3 million to the GOP in 2002, and its president, Frank Hanley, has appeared at several previous events with Bush.

The White House chose politically friendly territory for the event. Although surrounding communities tilt Democrat, Richfield leans Republican. Bush's motorcade route took him along stately homes in an affluent neighborhood, and clusters of supporters waved signs backing the president.

His crowd applauded when Bush argued that two rounds of tax cuts had kept the recession shallow and had helped spur factory jobs.

 

Democrats said the tax cuts have gone to the wealthiest taxpayers and have sent the deficit spiraling to $480 billion for next year, while doing little to jump-start the economy.

"I hope his tour of the state will include the empty factories and bankrupt corporations," said Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich (news, bio, voting record), one of nine Democrats vying to challenge Bush.

The Labor Day trip marked Bush's first public appearance since he returned Saturday from a monthlong stay on his ranch in Crawford, Texas. It kicks off a burst of heavy travel in the 15 months leading up to Election Day.

Bush still had Crawford on his mind as he addressed the operating engineers.

"We need a little rain in Crawford," he told an audience shielding itself with rain slickers and garbage bags. "Send it that way, if you don't mind."



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: bush43; bushdoctrine; bushrecovery; bushtaxcuts; construction; economicteam; freetrade; laborday; manufacturing; manufacturingczar; outsourcing; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
Better late than never I guess.
1 posted on 09/01/2003 12:33:45 PM PDT by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sixmil
I don't believe there is much the government can or should specifically do to attract or create jobs - manufacturing or otherwise.

They should focus on keeping taxes and regulation as light as possible, and leave the rest to the genius of the market.
2 posted on 09/01/2003 12:38:49 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
"One way to make sure that the manufacturing sector does well is to send a message overseas, (to) say, look, we expect there to be a fair playing field when it comes to trade," Bush said.

Finally!!!

3 posted on 09/01/2003 12:38:51 PM PDT by Balto_Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Better late than never I guess.

Bush is the incumbent. He is going to have to deliver some significant results to have credibility. A few words, or vague promises, aren't going to cut it.
4 posted on 09/01/2003 12:39:13 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
There must be an election coming up.
5 posted on 09/01/2003 12:39:49 PM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
They should focus on keeping taxes and regulation as light as possible, and leave the rest to the genius of the market.

1) Tarrifs 2) The mere threat of retaliatory tarrifs 3) Domestic investment tax credits for new manufacturing or expanded manufacturing facilities.
6 posted on 09/01/2003 12:42:22 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Rush read an article last week from someone who looked at manufactirung jobs in the 1990's and found that jobs HAVE NOT BEEN LOST. It's a big lie, constantly regurgitated by the media and liberals (redundancy alert!)

Anyone else hear this, and can post the article?

7 posted on 09/01/2003 12:43:44 PM PDT by paul in cape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
and bankrupt corporations," said Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich

But Dennis, I thought the evil corporations were being given tons of money from the evil Bush administration, how can they be bankrupt?

8 posted on 09/01/2003 12:46:48 PM PDT by StriperSniper (The Federal Register is printed on pulp from The Tree Of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
Rush read an article last week from someone who looked at manufactirung jobs in the 1990's and found that jobs HAVE NOT BEEN LOST. It's a big lie, constantly regurgitated by the media and liberals (redundancy alert!)

Rush read a single document that runs contrary to everything else published and this is deemed credible? What is today, "I'm right and everyone else is wrong," day?

9 posted on 09/01/2003 12:48:38 PM PDT by Archangelsk ("Toss in a buck ya cheap bastard, I paid for your g**damn breakfast." Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
That's interesting, I've read articles saying that we've lost 5 million manufacturing jobs in the last 5 years. I'm not saying that I necessarily believe it, but that is what was reported. I'm curious as to what the real story is here.
10 posted on 09/01/2003 12:50:10 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I don't believe there is much the government can or should specifically do to attract or create jobs - manufacturing or otherwise.
I agree, but I also think there is a lot that government can do to kill jobs like the unilateral free trade policy we have now. I'd like to see tarriffs raised until the trade deficit is zero and stays there, along with corresponding cuts on income and business taxes. Eventually we are going to have to admit that there is no benefit (just the opposite actually) to trading any more freely than everyone else does. Even with the WTO, we are not able to get everyone to play along, so we should develop a policy that is not dependent on how others play the game.

11 posted on 09/01/2003 12:50:16 PM PDT by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
"I want you to understand that I understand that Ohio manufacturers are hurting, that there's a problem with the manufacturing sector," Bush said. "I understand that for a full recovery, to make sure people can find work, that manufacturing must do better," Bush said.

I'm sorry, but this is the President's version of "I feel your pain."

12 posted on 09/01/2003 12:50:51 PM PDT by Archangelsk ("Toss in a buck ya cheap bastard, I paid for your g**damn breakfast." Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I think this is the story you are talking about:

Manufacturing myths

13 posted on 09/01/2003 12:52:38 PM PDT by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
I suspect that it was the same Op Ed piece by Bruce Bartlett that was posted here and subsequently shot full of holes by any number of posters.
14 posted on 09/01/2003 12:52:59 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: paul in cape
This might be of interest: Manufacturing myths.
15 posted on 09/01/2003 12:54:08 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
You posted it just before me. Thanks!
16 posted on 09/01/2003 12:54:56 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Gee, President Bush. It's Labor Day and you're making a speech bemoaning to jobs lost to overseas companies, etc.

And, what's this... not one word about the thousands (millions?) of jobs lost to criminal aliens invading our country at will? Perhaps you're unaware of this problem?

17 posted on 09/01/2003 12:59:00 PM PDT by upchuck (I will pay big bucks for a tag line good enough to make the next "Taglinus FreeRepublicus" post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kms61
Thanks. It's time for all of us to face the hard reality of the following: if the President does not change the perception of unemployment in the next 15 months he will lose the election. The Democratic candidate, whoever he or she may be will take the 30% of the voters who make their decisions two months prior to the election. They will base their decision on emotion and we will be worse off for it.
18 posted on 09/01/2003 12:59:15 PM PDT by Archangelsk ("Toss in a buck ya cheap bastard, I paid for your g**damn breakfast." Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
What was the gist of Rush's arguement?

I have noticed a few Freepers posting some rant about manufacturing organizations and how they have evolved decentralized structures which outsource much of the work. They argue that since these jobs are provided through third party services, that they are tallied under services and that makes the manufacturing loss look worse then it is. Yet, if this were true we would have been reporting a massive surge in new service sector jobs. Instead we have a net loss of jobs across both sectors of the economy.

If it were only the domestic outsourcing of work then we wouldn't have a concern. Our concern is the net loss of American jobs to external manufacturing and service firms.
19 posted on 09/01/2003 12:59:24 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Wow - that's what I call a big government approach that would make Hillary Clinton proud! And who says a zero trade deficit is desirable? So long as we have the strongest economy in the world, it will be natural for us to import more goods and services from around the world than we sell to other, less rich, countries.

A tariff consists of a tax on domestic consumers, by the way.

Have a read of this column by David Limbaugh, which aptly explains the fallacies of "fair" trade, and offers an excellent example from the king of free markets, Milton Friedman:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/davidlimbaugh/dl20020309.shtml
20 posted on 09/01/2003 1:07:54 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson