Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Approved Departure of Saudis After Sept. 11, Ex-Aide Says
New York Times ^ | September 4, 2003 | By ERIC LICHTBLAU

Posted on 09/04/2003 12:01:08 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed

WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 — Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today.

The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism. The White House feared that the Saudis could face "retribution" for the hijackings if they remained in the United States, Mr. Clarke said.

The fact that relatives of Mr. bin Laden and other Saudis had been rushed out of the country became public soon after the Sept. 11 attacks. But questions have lingered about the circumstances of their departure, and Mr. Clarke's statements provided the first acknowledgment that the White House had any direct involvement in the plan and that senior administration officials personally signed off on it.

Mr. Clarke first made his remarks about the plan in an article in Vanity Fair due out Thursday, and he expanded on those remarks today in an interview and in Congressional testimony. The White House said today that it had no comment on Mr. Clarke's statements.

The disclosure came just weeks after the classified part of a Congressional report on the Sept. 11 attacks suggested that Saudi Arabia had financial links to the hijackers, and Mr. Clarke's comments are likely to fuel accusations that the United States has gone soft on the Saudis because of diplomatic concerns.

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, seized on Mr. Clarke's comments to call on the White House to conduct an investigation into the hasty departures of about 140 Saudis from the United States in the days after the attacks.

Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11.

"This is just another example of our country coddling the Saudis and giving them special privileges that others would never get," Mr. Schumer said. "It's almost as if we didn't want to find out what links existed."

Saudi officials could not be reached for comment today, but in the past they have denied accusations linking them to the 19 hijackers, 15 of them from Saudi Arabia.

While F.B.I. officials would not discuss details of the case, they said that in the days immediately after Sept. 11 bureau agents interviewed the adult relatives of Mr. bin Laden, members of one of Saudi Arabia's richest families, before the White House cleared them to leave the country. Mr. bin Laden is said to be estranged from his family, and many of his relatives have renounced his campaign against the United States.

"We did everything that needed to be done," said John Iannarelli, a bureau spokesman. "There's nothing to indicate that any of these people had any information that could have assisted us, and no one was accorded any additional courtesies that wouldn't have been accorded anyone else."

But the Vanity Fair investigation quotes Dale Watson, the former head of counterterrorism at the F.B.I., as saying that the departing Saudis "were not subject to serious interviews or interrogations."

Mr. Watson could not be reached for comment today.

The article depicts an elaborate but hurried evacuation carried out within a week of the hijackings in which private planes picked up Saudis from 10 cities. Some aviation and bureau officials said they were upset by the operation because the government had not lifted flight restrictions for the general public, but those officials said they lacked the power to stop the evacuation, the article says.

Mr. Clarke, who left the White House in February, said in an interview that he was driven by concern that the Saudis "would be targeted for retribution" by Americans after the hijackings.

Mr. Clarke said he told the bureau to hold anyone it had suspicions about, and the F.B.I. said it did not hold anyone.

Mr. Schumer said he doubted the thoroughness of a rushed review by the bureau, and in a letter to the White House today he said the Saudis appeared to have gotten "a free pass" despite their possible knowledge about the attacks.

New Sentences Ordered for Somalis RICHMOND, Va., Sept. 3 (AP) — Jail terms for two Somali men linked to the Qaeda network were too light, an appeals court ruled today.

The three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ordered new sentencing for the men, who were convicted of evading financial reporting laws while transferring more than $6 million to the United Arab Emirates.

One of the men, Abdirahman Sheikh-ali Isse, was sentenced last year to 18 months in prison; the other, Abdillah S. Abdi, was sentenced to 10 months. Prosecutors have argued for sentences of three to five years.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fourthcircuit; richmond; saudis; september112001; september12era; somalia; terrortrials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: concerned about politics
The Democrats are running out of ideas. They've been going back in time to try to dig up something, anything, they think they can spin against Bush. Notice "The air was bad in NY! What did he know?" crap Hillary has pulled out in the last week?

I think it has to do with that new book .. from what I can tell of the news reports, this book must be pretty damaging. The author has documentation and quotes from the Clinton Administration in it.

41 posted on 09/04/2003 1:11:53 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

This is OLD News

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

42 posted on 09/04/2003 1:21:22 PM PDT by jbstrick (Behold the Power of CHEESE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Go back to DU.
43 posted on 09/04/2003 1:23:20 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I think it has to do with that new book .. from what I can tell of the news reports, this book must be pretty damaging. The author has documentation and quotes from the Clinton Administration in it.

And according to another thread, up to #3 already.

44 posted on 09/04/2003 1:25:43 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Losing Bin Ladin.....It's on my list for next Wed. A must have!
45 posted on 09/04/2003 1:32:20 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
...he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism...

I find it hard to believe that the 'kiwi-less' FBI had any idea whether or not any of these people were linked to terrorism.

46 posted on 09/04/2003 1:33:42 PM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Call me paranoid but finding '/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I ordered it and just waiting for it to come in the mail
47 posted on 09/04/2003 1:39:32 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
As much as I loathe LEFTISTS like Chuckie Schumer, I have to wonder about only two aircraft allowed to fly within 24 hours of 9/11. Understandably, Air Force One. The other is VERY disconcerting, an aircraft belonging to the Saudis.

Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11.

The article depicts an elaborate but hurried evacuation carried out within a week of the hijackings in which private planes picked up Saudis from 10 cities. Some aviation and bureau officials said they were upset by the operation because the government had not lifted flight restrictions for the general public, but those officials said they lacked the power to stop the evacuation, the article says.

This may very well have been published in past but, it has not been discussed here on FR at any great lengths that I can recall. Again, the events around and on 9/11 need to be discussed. We all know about Caligula Clinton's criminality. What we don't know much about imo, are things related to this thread that occured AFTER the Sinkmeister and Hildabeast.
48 posted on 09/04/2003 1:43:46 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I ordered it and just waiting for it to come in the mail

I would, but I just sent my spouce to pick up another book (I had Barns and Noble order it for me last week) today after work. I'll have to wait now until next pay day. Drat. I like this one better.

49 posted on 09/04/2003 1:44:48 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"This is just another example of our country coddling the Saudis and giving them special privileges that others would never get," Mr. Schumer said. "It's almost as if we didn't want to find out what links existed."

Could it be because they supply us with ....oil?

Instead of griping Mr. Shumer, why don't you support our drilling on the North Slope ?
Could it be because you would lose an issue? Your quest for power for the dems trumps the welfare and security of our Country.

This story is a non-starter.
I remember TV cameras showing the plane leaving. If I remember correctly, it flew out of Logan.

50 posted on 09/04/2003 2:01:46 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
This story is a non-starter. I remember TV cameras showing the plane leaving. If I remember correctly, it flew out of Logan.

I think the Democrats have gone over the edge. They're getting really freaky lately. It's like they're mentally going back in time, like members of the NEA, back, back, back, to where they feel they had a life. It's bazaar.

51 posted on 09/04/2003 2:14:03 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
You really think the FBI/CIA/Bush didn't know the location of every mercury filling in the mouths of each Saudi on that plane?

You expect people to think the FBI/CIA/Bush knew everything about what happened on 9/11 a couple of days afterward, yet not have had enough data to stop it the day before 9/11. Which is it?

52 posted on 09/04/2003 2:26:40 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === needs a job at the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pyx
As much as I loathe LEFTISTS like Chuckie Schumer, I have to wonder about only two aircraft allowed to fly within 24 hours of 9/11. Understandably, Air Force One. The other is VERY disconcerting, an aircraft belonging to the Saudis.

If the concern had truly been "concern for their safety", they could have been placed into protective custody at the nearest Army base

53 posted on 09/04/2003 2:31:48 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === needs a job at the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba; DoughtyOne
"This is just another example of our country coddling the Saudis and giving them special privileges that others would never get," Mr. Schumer said. "It's almost as if we didn't want to find out what links existed."


schumer is spot on with this observation...
Bush has a tender spot for his saudi "partners" in the war on terrorism.. after all, only 19 or so of the terrorist murderors were actually KNOWN to be of saudi nationality...

and when the bush adminstration said they were "not yet sure" who was behind this... they had already gotten the saudis out safely.

of course we need a "homeland security act" and a whole rash of new "total information awareness" database mining types, to keep check on AMERICAN Citizens... because WE are what they want to watch... But the saudi "friends" of you know who... they were on the next plane to Riyhad....

This will get a lot more interesting before the next election.
Leaks galore and reminders we don't want to face.

EVERY one of the saudis that killed us, as far as I know, were here in violation of the terms of their visas... and this administration was NOT doing anything about their violation of immigration laws...

Our borders are still wide open.... but we ARE keeping track of every post on the internet, every bank transaction of AMERICANS who had NOTHING to do with 9-11!!!

I will still vote for Bush over Dean...
But we do have a problem with the way things are headed...
big time.
54 posted on 09/04/2003 2:45:48 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (they promised us smaller government... is it smaller yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I think the FBI/CIA/BUSH had enough intel on a planeload of very specific Saudis to know which ones had box cutters up their skirts and which didn't.

This is a red herring to deflect scrutiny of real threats, inside our borders and out.

IMO, 99% of politics and history is manipulated.

It's that one percent you gotta watch out for.

55 posted on 09/04/2003 2:55:46 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pyx
This may very well have been published in past but, it has not been discussed here on FR at any great lengths that I can recall.

Whether you can recall it or not, it most certainly was.

The media is dredging up old news and making it sound like it is "new".

Just the other day there was a "revelation" of a "top secret" phone call between President Bush and VP Cheney on 9/11. The article went on to reveal that it was just learned that Bush had given the "shoot down" order if any aircraft did not comply with the no fly order and so on.

Well, I demonstrated in short order that this was widely known as of September 17, 2001.

There is a reason that, as others have noted, these old events are being brought up as if they are just discovered facts, and it is not to shed light, but to make sinister accusations against this administration.

56 posted on 09/04/2003 2:55:58 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Go back to DU.

Did you even read my posts? I'm supporting Bush on this.

I think he can send back to Saudi Arabia anyone he wants, whenever he wants. That planeload of inbred cross-dressers had nothing to do with 9-11, IMO.

If that's what they're saying now on DU, great! (But I doubt it).

57 posted on 09/04/2003 3:05:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11.

But during the past two years, has any evidence come forward for their arrests? No.

58 posted on 09/04/2003 3:13:52 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pyx
"The things that are related to this thread" are still related to Bubblehead-Bill and his consort.

If the Dems manage to pin any of 9-11 on the Republicans, Bush should fire every P.R. guy on staff.

September 11 occurred because godless democrats ignored real life problems while they pandered to the lowest common denominator in order to remain in power.

59 posted on 09/04/2003 3:14:53 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
If the concern had truly been "concern for their safety", they could have been placed into protective custody at the nearest Army base

What?!? Can you imagine the fallout? Yes, that includes the big flash in the sky cya good-bye 'fallout'.

60 posted on 09/04/2003 3:23:45 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson