Skip to comments.
N. Korea: North-Bound Missile Trucks Seized
Chosun Ilbo ^
| 09/07/03
| Choi Heup
Posted on 09/07/2003 4:52:16 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
North-Bound Missile Trucks Seized
by Choi Heup (pot@chosun.com)
Authorities in Japan have caught a company there in the act of illegally exporting to North Korea via China large trailer trucks that can be used as mobile missile launchers, the Japanese newspaper Yomiuri reported over the weekend. The trucks were partially dismantled before being loaded onto the freighter, according to the report. The company attempting to export them specializes in selling second-hand cars. The trucks were dismantled and loaded in separate locations in an attempt to fool customs inspectors, Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry said.
The ministry has pressed criminal charges against the company.
This is the first time the Japanese ministry has press charges for illegal export to North Korea by way of China.
The large trailer trucks themselves are not prohibited as export items, but are subject to a catch-all rule that applies to items which may ultimately be used to produce or deploy weapons of mass destruction.
Earlier this year, the accused company had submitted a claim to authorities to win permission to export the trailer trucks to the North, and was turned down, the Yomiuri report added.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: japan; launcher; missile; nkorea; northkorea; truck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
More squeeze on N. Korea.
To: AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk
Ping!
To: TigerLikesRooster
Good News.
3
posted on
09/07/2003 4:57:19 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
(If you Sprinkle When You Tinkle,...Be a Sweetie and Wipe the Seatie......)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I have been wondering if it is possibly that the "sudden" change of policy in Iraq could be because we need our troops out to go after either Iran or NK?
To: ican'tbelieveit
Re #4
I guess that it takes longer time to stabilize Iraq than was originally estimated. Iraqi occupation is costing a lot of money. N. Korea and Iran are both accelerating their nuclear program. Military contingency could come sooner than U.S. has expected.
N. Korea may try to go nuclear before the next presidential election because U.S. government is preoccupied with election politics. Any clear indication of that would force the U.S. military response.
To: TigerLikesRooster
But, according to Jimmy Carter, this is the USA's fault for oppressing the NK's.
According to Jimmy, the NK's have no other choice, unless the USA gives US tax-payer money to NK.
Where, oh where, is the humanity...
6
posted on
09/07/2003 5:39:42 PM PDT
by
jungleboy
To: TigerLikesRooster
Japan has the most to lose if NK launches an attack.......
Glad to see they are stepping up to the plate. Too bad they have such a mealy mouthed jerk for leader of SK
7
posted on
09/07/2003 5:50:31 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
To: ican'tbelieveit
"I have been wondering if it is possibly that the "sudden" change of policy in Iraq could be because we need our troops out to go after either Iran or NK?" Yup.
8
posted on
09/07/2003 5:56:21 PM PDT
by
blam
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: TigerLikesRooster
We are not doing enough in NK! We do to something!
10
posted on
09/07/2003 6:48:25 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: KevinDavis
I meant say, we need to do something! It is all GW fault for doing nothing!
11
posted on
09/07/2003 6:49:19 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: KevinDavis
It is all GW fault for doing nothing! Yeh, riiiiight. Go back one election, and I'd say you had something and agree with you.
12
posted on
09/07/2003 7:21:17 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: ican'tbelieveit
I have been wondering if it is possibly that the "sudden" change of policy in Iraq could be because we need our troops out to go after either Iran or NK?I think it's more because we just don't have enough troops left for rotation and I don't think it would be good for morale to lreave those kids there for 4 - 10 years.
13
posted on
09/07/2003 7:37:03 PM PDT
by
varon
To: TigerLikesRooster
What was it that Kruschev said about the capitalists? Something about a rope?
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: ican'tbelieveit
I have been wondering if it is possibly that the "sudden" change of policy in Iraq could be because we need our troops out to go after either Iran or NK?
Hope so. And I hope they need troops bad then maybe someone will listen to me when I ask for a green card so I can enlist and go. There's lots of Canadians disgusted with the Liberal gov't and would be more then happy to enlist with the US and fight for it.
16
posted on
09/08/2003 2:39:27 AM PDT
by
bitcon
To: TigerLikesRooster
Japan really is putting the squeeze on. When I first saw the headlines I thought they had some kind of TEL system involved. Apparently, Japan is blocking anything that might even remotely be useful.
17
posted on
09/08/2003 2:46:17 AM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Too close for guns, switching to missiles!)
To: KevinDavis
Right.
OH MY GOD!!! WERE ALL GONNA DIE!!! We have to DO something! Anything!
Even if its the wrong thing, or ineffective.
Better we should do our best to clear up the mess were in in Afghanistan and Iraq, take a break and regroup then think it through and take care of N. Korea.
18
posted on
09/08/2003 2:58:41 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
To: jungleboy
Just like the way we forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbor?
19
posted on
09/08/2003 2:59:52 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
To: KevinDavis
Actually it is Jimmy Carter's and Bubba Clinton's fault along with the third party hacks who don't want us to do anything.
20
posted on
09/08/2003 9:42:14 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson