Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gen. Clark Weighs Presidential Bid; Accuses Bush of inaction before 9/11
AP ^ | September 13, 2003 | nwrep

Posted on 09/14/2003 6:35:27 PM PDT by nwrep


The Associated Press

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. Sept. 13

Retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark, sensing growing support for a Democratic presidential bid, said Saturday he is days away from announcing a decision and launched into an attack on President Bush.

In a half-hour speech to 1,000 cheering Democrats in heavily Republican East Tennessee, Clark said Bush has failed the country on health care, education and foreign policy.

"The No. 1 responsibility of the commander in chief is what? The safety and security of the United States of America," Clark said, questioning the administration's efforts to avoid the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"What happened on 9-11, Mr. President? Why is it that eight months into your administration, why is it that there was no plan to deal with the number one threat that Bill Clinton's national security team warned you about when you took office?"

Clark charged the Bush administration with "obfuscation and slow investigations and memos and shenanigans and creating departments" in response to Sept. 11.

"Let's have some accountability, here," he said, recalling Harry Truman's credo that "The buck stops here."

Clark also challenged the president to explain the administration's strategy on the war in Iraq. "What is the intent, what is the plan, Mr. President? Because the commander in chief better have a plan and we haven't heard it yet."

Clark, 58, who headed the U.S. Southern Command and was NATO commander during the 1999 campaign in Kosovo, said his 34 years in the military taught him, "The highest calling of the armed forces is not to wage war, but to prevent war."

Supporters chanted "Draft, General Clark. Draft, General Clark."

"Now I haven't made up my mind whether I am going to run," Clark, in shirt sleeves, told the crowd. "But I have my jacket off. And you can figure this out."

In an interview earlier with The Associated Press on the front porch of actor David Keith's home, Clark said there was only one decision before him. "And that decision is, do you run for the office of president or do you stay in the private sector?"

Sounding like a candidate, he said without hesitation, "I think I have a tremendous amount to offer this country, a lifetime of public service and leadership."

He said a vice presidential slot is not on his mind, though he won't rule it out.

Clark, whose calendar includes a speech in Iowa Sept. 19, said he will announce his intentions within "the next few days probably," most likely in his home state of Arkansas.

"It just seemed to me if I was going to go to Iowa I probably ought to know what I was doing before I went there," he said.

Al Sharpton, one of nine Democrats already in the race, received a warm greeting in a speech to the Democrat dinner, but it seemed a warm-up to Clark.

Clark's candidacy "would only expand the field" and help the party, Sharpton said later. Clark said he would support Sharpton if the minister wins the nomination and Sharpton said he would do the same for Clark.

"If you can bring the Wesley Clark wing and the Al Sharpton wing of the party out, George Bush doesn't stand a chance," Sharpton said.

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) Howard Dean's campaign is expanding its much-touted Internet organizing as it heads toward the all-important end of the third quarter fund-raising period.

Campaign manager Joe Trippi outlined the steps Friday that range from the now-familiar Internet-organized monthly meetings via meetup.com to such newer ones as DeanTV and an expanding wireless network.

It has a goal of signing up 450,000 supporters via its Web site by the end of September, 900,000 by December and 2 million by the Democratic National Convention next August.

As of midday Friday, 390,111 people had signed up. Campaign staff said nearly all of them contribute in some form, nearly 40 percent financially and thousands more by organizing events, handing out fliers or gaining more visibility for Dean.

Trippi, while leading reporters through a demonstration of the campaign's redoubled online efforts, told of a group of 80 from Philadelphia who attended a Phillies baseball game wearing their Dean T-shirts. They were welcomed to the game with an announcement on the ballpark's scoreboard. He showed a picture of a similar group in Florida who had done the same thing.

Trippi said the goal is to develop a campaign consisting of concentric circles. The headquarters staff is at the center and networks of loosely organized volunteers across the country are in circles linking with the national team.

The tools include such things as DeanTV, where the candidate gives a pep talk each month to be shown to supporters who meet via the Web site MeetUp.com.



TOPICS: Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; alqaeda; arkancide; bushdoctrineunfold; clark; clintonalumni; clintonscandals; donkeyslapper; electionpresident; fthood; icg; idiot; kla; perfumed; prince; rhodesscholar; soros; waco; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: nwrep
This makes me sick. He owes an appology to every American.
21 posted on 09/14/2003 7:16:53 PM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Maybe Clark can win the brainless idiot award. Maybe all the Dems can win it.
22 posted on 09/14/2003 7:20:10 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I actually heard that many of Clark's former collegues in the army are going to come out against him.

Well, tell them to get a move on!!! This guy needs to be cut off at the knees....NOW! What a pompous, good for nothing, opportunistic, lying scumbag! (Tomorrow I'll tell you how I really feel about him.)

23 posted on 09/14/2003 7:25:03 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"Why is it that eight months into your administration, why is it that there was no plan to deal with the number one threat that Bill Clinton's national security team warned you about when you took office?"

If this was the threat they believed it was, then why did Gore and the Democrats obstruct from this mission when they tried to steal the election, leading to months of indecision? And why did they continue this obstruction as Bush tried to put together his cabinet? If this was such an important issue, John Ashcroft (and others) should've been sworn in immediatley to get to the task at hand...but that didn't happen. Instead, we had endless debates over ideology. I just don't recall all this concern in 2001.
24 posted on 09/14/2003 7:31:06 PM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"What happened on 9-11, Mr. President? Why is it that eight months into your administration, why is it that there was no plan to deal with the number one threat that Bill Clinton's national security team warned you about when you took office?"

This statement has Bill Clinton written all over it. If this guy becomes President it will be another term for Bill Clinton and Clark will be merely his mouthpiece. I can just hear Clinton telling Clark: [in dumb-guy Clinton voice] "Ahh warned them about Ahl-Qaeda. Ahh told 'em it was the number one security threat". And, Clark just eats it up, brown-noser that he is.

25 posted on 09/14/2003 7:33:23 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
Since the release of "Losing Bin Laden" the Clinton machine has been running full bore.
26 posted on 09/14/2003 7:42:25 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
Clark is the Clinton Team candidate. One wonders if he is merely a place holder for Hillary. He scoops up a lot of delegates and then bows to a draft Hillary crusade accepting the VP spot instead.
27 posted on 09/14/2003 7:49:53 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Perfumed Prince makes more of a stink
28 posted on 09/14/2003 8:02:44 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarl
u couldn't be more wrong if you purposely set out to be so. Gen. Clark is a brilliant and independent thinker who managed the operation in Bosnia as Supreme Commander of NATO. He is a strong proponent of a national defense structure that would have avoided the morass that has evolved in Iraq. Irrespective of whether we obtain any assistance from any allied power or there is a satisfactory UN resolution, Gen Clark's broad experience in force management, an understanding of logistics and effective resupply that thus far has escaped the sycophants and know-nothing civilians surrounding Rumsfeld and the president, and his grasp of foreign policies realities that is orders of magnitude beyond the present National Command structure are benefits that he brings to the table.

Support him or don't, that's a function of individual study, analysis and even predisposition. But pejorative attributions to him as knee-jerk reaction to his possible opposition to the sitting president is neither intelligent, persuasive nor idicative of commentary by a person worthy of others' attention.

29 posted on 09/14/2003 8:05:01 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

30 posted on 09/14/2003 8:07:57 PM PDT by RJayneJ (To see pictures of Jayne's quilt: http://bulldogbulletin.lhhosting.com/page50.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
It's strange because either a) Clark is a complete idiot; or, b) he thinks we're complete idiots.

Let's not even bring up his "sober" commentary on CNN in April.

31 posted on 09/14/2003 8:18:11 PM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RJayneJ

32 posted on 09/14/2003 8:22:07 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
"I actually heard that many of Clark's former collegues in the army are going to come out against him." OK, but who is going to show it on TV or print it? CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS?? by the time the networks are done with him he'll have 6 "stars". (Thats one more than Ike, Mac Arthur, Bradley and Marshall.)
33 posted on 09/14/2003 8:23:14 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Where is Hillary's Living History now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Inaction before 9-11? Huh? So Bush was supposed to take us to War against the Taliban while Clark's buddies were still contesting the Presidential election. If the Left knew (or cared) about the threat America faced, they wouldn't have tried to castrate the Bush Presidency before 9-11.
34 posted on 09/14/2003 8:25:22 PM PDT by faithincowboys (Defeat the Fifth Column Leftist Bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
Here's a butt-licking leftist's view of W vs. Clark
(Kal at Balto Sun)

Really, such a big, big man.

35 posted on 09/14/2003 8:26:30 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: middie
Support him or don't, that's a function of individual study, analysis and even predisposition. But pejorative attributions to him as knee-jerk reaction to his possible opposition to the sitting president is neither intelligent, persuasive nor idicative of commentary by a person worthy of others' attention.

I disagree. Any General who hitched his star to a Military Hater like Clinton, is worthy of our scorn. Im not decrying his service, just his contradictory politics. Clinton's hatred and abuse of our Military was deplorable, and Clarks constant reference to his position in Clintons admin, speaks volumes for his character. He simply cant be trusted based on his pride of working for Clinton. Becuase he certainly wasnt working for America..

36 posted on 09/14/2003 8:28:32 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Nice cartoon, hope the real general didn't wear those pants for his retention board photo.
37 posted on 09/14/2003 8:30:03 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Where is Hillary's Living History now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Like most Clintonites, the man is a shameless liar.
38 posted on 09/14/2003 8:31:28 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Yeah, some "real war hero."

Bomb Kosovo from 15,000 feet, and then damn near start World War III with the race to Pristina...
39 posted on 09/14/2003 8:33:19 PM PDT by Poohbah (Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"Accuses Bush of inaction before 9-11."

As opposed to Clinton/Clark, who actively aided the Islamofascists with their war against Serbia.

40 posted on 09/14/2003 8:33:33 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy ( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson