Skip to comments.
Womb 'smile' fires abortion row
The Age Online ^
| September 14, 2003
| By Rebecca Urban, James Meikle
Posted on 09/15/2003 10:35:24 AM PDT by miltonim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
reuters
I was surprised when I saw a story on this baby's picture on a regular TV network channel. What is this world coming to?!?
1
posted on
09/15/2003 10:35:25 AM PDT
by
miltonim
To: miltonim
I can't link but GE has a remarkable video demo available.I think it is such a wonderful sight.
2
posted on
09/15/2003 10:39:27 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: miltonim
I can't believe this is news. I still remember watching my oldest on ultrasound at just 19 weeks. He was swimming around, obviously having a good time in there, and he had the most innocent expression on his face. I will never forget it.
3
posted on
09/15/2003 10:45:03 AM PDT
by
Tired of Taxes
(and tired of this screenname, too.)
To: miltonim
Dr Brodie, of Australian Birth Control Services, said it was still unknown if smiles, or other facial movements, were the result of neurological reflexes or emotional development.wideawake, of Baby Murderer Observation Services, said it was still unknown if seething hatred of unborn children is the result of neurological defects or emotional underdevelopment.
4
posted on
09/15/2003 10:45:16 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: MEG33
5
posted on
09/15/2003 10:45:37 AM PDT
by
miltonim
To: MEG33
The server will link automatically if you don't put any HTML tags in the post. Just copy the ling, paste it, and hit the Post button.
6
posted on
09/15/2003 10:47:41 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: miltonim
Whether the facial expressions are an emotional response or merely physical reflex is likely to be debated. Pathetic. Is that the best they can do!
They even question if these unborn children are "human beings." No, actually they are frogs. Sheesh.
7
posted on
09/15/2003 10:47:53 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: miltonim
Thanks.It's been a long time since I had a baby so it is remarkable to me.
8
posted on
09/15/2003 10:48:18 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Blood of Tyrants
Miltonin did it!
9
posted on
09/15/2003 10:49:18 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Tired of Taxes
I am right with you! My wife is 18 weeks and we have seen the baby kick, "wave", and shimmy during the last two ultrasounds. News of this sort is going to help us in the fight to outlaw Abortion.
10
posted on
09/15/2003 10:49:55 AM PDT
by
CanisRex
(my .02)
To: Blood of Tyrants
11
posted on
09/15/2003 10:53:58 AM PDT
by
miltonim
To: CanisRex
Absolutely!
12
posted on
09/15/2003 10:57:49 AM PDT
by
miltonim
To: CanisRex
I am afraid nothing will help outlaw abortion until moral representatives are elected. There are just too many people willing to murder babies because they impinge on their lifestyle.
13
posted on
09/15/2003 10:59:05 AM PDT
by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: miltonim
Why does a baby blink when we assume it is dark inside the uterus?" Professor Campbell(Obstetrician) said. Well if Professor Campbell thinks the only reason for blinking is the presence of light, he should be tied to a stake with his eyes sewn open in a sandstorm in the middle of the night in the Sahara. Afterall, there will be no need for him to blink.
14
posted on
09/15/2003 11:00:21 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
To: freeangel
I believe the only thing that will really work is to change minds and hearts.
15
posted on
09/15/2003 11:01:22 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: StriperSniper
re: Well if Professor Campbell thinks the only reason for blinking is the presence of light, he should be tied to a stake with his eyes sewn open in a sandstorm in the middle of the night in the Sahara. )))
Whence this hostility?
Prof. Campbell merely posits what I'd say was an interesting enough question (though the babe probably blinks in REM sleep); I don't see that it is partisan one way or another. Prof. Campbell does say "baby" after all, which is something of a giveaway as to his probable opinion on the nature of preborn human life.
16
posted on
09/15/2003 11:06:46 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: MHGinTN
ping!
To: MEG33
I believe the only thing that will really work is to change minds and hearts. Correct. Right now, "minds and hearts" are governed by sympathy for the pregnant women -- this baby will cause them a lot of stress and inconvenience, which we can all understand.
The only counter to this is to re-establish the understanding of what the "choice" is really all about --that "reason X" is sufficient to justify the death of the unborn child.
The task is to establish that second part in peoples' minds -- that we're talking about reasons to decide to kill a child. This technology might do it -- but not on its own.
18
posted on
09/15/2003 11:12:53 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: miltonim
I know at least one baby that smiled right after birth: my son.
He was crying while the nurses and doctors poked him, but when dad held him up to my face for the first time ( I couldn't hold him because my abdomen was being stitched up), he not only calmed but smiled.
We have a picture of him swaddled on my hospital bed, taken as we prepared to get ready to go home. He is smiling.
A friend saw the picture and said - that's not a newborn, thats a six-month old baby! But he was four days old.
19
posted on
09/15/2003 11:14:32 AM PDT
by
SarahW
To: Mamzelle; Tailgunner Joe
Prenatal babies have been proven to have brainwave activity just like that seen in dreaming adults. The scare to the champions of serial killing to the preborn is that their dehumanization of the preborn (which is actually the founding principle of the abortion on demand/women's special right to choose a serial killer) will suddenly be called into question as the very real humanity of the preborn is revealed!
20
posted on
09/15/2003 11:20:37 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson