Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


reuters

I was surprised when I saw a story on this baby's picture on a regular TV network channel. What is this world coming to?!?

1 posted on 09/15/2003 10:35:25 AM PDT by miltonim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: miltonim
I can't link but GE has a remarkable video demo available.I think it is such a wonderful sight.
2 posted on 09/15/2003 10:39:27 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
I can't believe this is news. I still remember watching my oldest on ultrasound at just 19 weeks. He was swimming around, obviously having a good time in there, and he had the most innocent expression on his face. I will never forget it.

3 posted on 09/15/2003 10:45:03 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (and tired of this screenname, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
Dr Brodie, of Australian Birth Control Services, said it was still unknown if smiles, or other facial movements, were the result of neurological reflexes or emotional development.

wideawake, of Baby Murderer Observation Services, said it was still unknown if seething hatred of unborn children is the result of neurological defects or emotional underdevelopment.

4 posted on 09/15/2003 10:45:16 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
Whether the facial expressions are an emotional response or merely physical reflex is likely to be debated.

Pathetic. Is that the best they can do!

They even question if these unborn children are "human beings." No, actually they are frogs. Sheesh.

7 posted on 09/15/2003 10:47:53 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
Why does a baby blink when we assume it is dark inside the uterus?" Professor Campbell(Obstetrician) said.

Well if Professor Campbell thinks the only reason for blinking is the presence of light, he should be tied to a stake with his eyes sewn open in a sandstorm in the middle of the night in the Sahara. Afterall, there will be no need for him to blink.

14 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:21 AM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
I know at least one baby that smiled right after birth: my son.

He was crying while the nurses and doctors poked him, but when dad held him up to my face for the first time ( I couldn't hold him because my abdomen was being stitched up), he not only calmed but smiled.

We have a picture of him swaddled on my hospital bed, taken as we prepared to get ready to go home. He is smiling.

A friend saw the picture and said - that's not a newborn, thats a six-month old baby! But he was four days old.
19 posted on 09/15/2003 11:14:32 AM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
I remember reading an article on that other party's web forum (sorry, can't mention that name around here anymore). Anyway ... the guy was in pieces over an "anti-choice" ad he saw on TV. The ad was from the makers of the 3D sono equipment and refered to the baby as it should rightfully be ... a baby. The guy that wrote the post in that forum was just mad as hell over it. Quite funny and sad at the same time.
21 posted on 09/15/2003 11:22:43 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
abortionists are now having women who have abortions write little "sorry notes" to their dead babies. It was here on FR a while back. They have moved past dehumanization, and capitalizing on the fact that these "women" dont care that they are killing a real live baby, just as long as it doesnt cramp their style.
25 posted on 09/15/2003 11:49:08 AM PDT by Charlie OK (If you are a Christian, please drive like one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
"We're looking at recognisable human beings."

If that's the criterion then why is Helen Thomas still alive?

"I think they are clutching at straws," he said. "No doubt it will be picked up by those groups that use anything and everything to stop terminations but ignore the fact that women have a right to choice."

Unless it's the woman in the ultrasound picture. She has no choice whatsoever.

The hypocracy of the pro-abortion crowd can turn your stomach.

Shalom.

27 posted on 09/15/2003 11:54:04 AM PDT by ArGee (Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
The technology, known as a 3-D/4-D ultrasound, also reveals limb movements at eight weeks, leaping, turning and jumping at 11 to 12 weeks, intricate finger movements at 15 weeks and yawning at 20 weeks.

That cannot be true. Inanimate objects don't yawn.

30 posted on 09/15/2003 12:01:23 PM PDT by Skooz (All Hail the Mighty Kansas City Chiefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
I Love GE's motto: "We bring good things to life".
32 posted on 09/15/2003 12:03:38 PM PDT by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/921369/posts
Bringing Good Things to Life (ULTRASOUND)
Citizen magazine ^ | June 2003 | Karla Dial
Ever since I heard of this new technology, I've maintained that it is the Stealth Bomber that is going to zoom in under the pro-death crowd's radar and nuke them... once a woman sees what is really in her womb, it ceases to be a "tissue mass" and becomes... a baby. Her baby.
Silent Scream made an impact on those few who saw it.
Fetal Psychology wasn't even a blip.
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/921349/posts
The War Over Fetal Rights
MSNBC.COM ^ | 6/1/03 | Debra Rosenberg
Is this a person?
 
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/921231/posts
Treating the Tiniest (pro-life issue benefits from advances in fetal surgery)
NEWSWEEK ^ | June 9 issue | Claudia Kalb
 
 
 
 
 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/930870/posts
Hometown Heroes: Stirring the Pot (Pro-life moms take on The Pampered Chef)
Citizen Magazine ^ | June 2003 | Candi Cushman
Pro-Life 'Chefs' Exiting the Pampered Life
The Billionaire Bomb [Just look who's funding anti-population programs.]
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/931219/posts
The Fully Informed Mother's Act
Self | 6/18/03 | Blood of Tyrants

41 posted on 09/15/2003 1:39:40 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: miltonim
bump
48 posted on 09/16/2003 8:38:17 AM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson