Time to expose Wesley Clark

none | none | none

[NavTechie]

OK folks. Now that the Oxford 4-star monkey has entered the race. It is time to expose him for the brown nosing, bumbling idiot that he truly is. I urge you to dig up all items that you have read, heard and cited in the past.

I have lefty friends that are hailing him as the savior to the party. It digusts me because of what I know of his campaign in Bosnia and his mishandling of the entire affair.

IMHO he rubs me as a 'Slick Willie II' and I want nothing of him.

Bring it on Freepers!

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

Waco.

[smiley]

This morning on Fox News, Brian Kilmead brought up the question of Wesley Clark's credibility. Seems as though Gen. Clark made some outrageous statements while he was the sitting arm chair General on CCN regarding the Iraq war. Bottom line, Gen. Clark lies.....another "liar" from Arkansas.

[mewzilla]

Just google the words: "Wesley Clark", Iraq, and quagmire all together. You'll get plenty to start on :)

[Hurtgen]

Critical as the military has been of President Clinton's sense of propriety, their own faces should have been a little red when the army's Lt. Gen. Wesley Clark-director of strategy for the Joint Chiefs of Staff-had one of those heart-warming military-to-military exchanges with Serbian Gen. Ratko Mladic. That's the same Mladic who was nominated in 1992 by then-Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger as a prime candidate for a war-crimes trial for his vigorous "ethnic cleansing." According to State Department officials, Clark was asked twice to keep away from Mladic, but "he went anyway" according to the Washington Times (September 2, 1994). Clark's tête-à-tête with Mladic may be tame by Jane Fonda-visits-Hanoi standards, but, according to one U.S. official, "It's like cavorting with Hermann Goering." To further the embarrassment, a photo of Clark and Mladic, wearing each other's hats, appeared in several European newspapers (Washington Post, September 1, 1994).

[jimbo123]

Flashback: Brit General stops Wes Clark 'from starting WWIII'...

[Brilliant]

Clark ordered a British general to attack Russian troops in Bosnia, but the general refused, saying, "I am not going to start WWIII over you." Can't see why anyone would trust him with the briefcase. Also, he was drummed out of the military because he could not get along with his subordinates. Not a very ringing endorsement. Those same subordinates would be under him if he were Commander in Chief.

[mewzilla]

Here's a link to a story on the particular lie in question.

[Miss Marple]

And here's the picture, Hurtgen, to go with that little item you just posted. I suggest it be downloaded onto your hard drive, as it is from a foreign source and may disappear.

[jmstein7]

That's interesting. . . if you take a clip of what Clark predicted would happen (negative) and then when actually happened (positive) in any phase of the Iraq war, you will see that he was almost always wrong. Do we want a guy who is always wrong as president? NO (that's why Jimmy Carter got the boot).

[reformedliberal]

See Drudge this morning. He's on it in regards to Pristina/WWIII.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

...Clark ordered a British general to attack Russian troops in Bosnia, but the general refused,...

General Waco Clark had no such reservation when ordered to gas and burn the children.

[BluH2o]

David Hackworth, much decorated former Army Colonel, author, TV analyst/pundit, has stated that Clark epitomized the military term "perfumed prince". He's just another product of Arkansas who has a very high opinion of himself; Clark's candidacy for president is an ego trip, an opportunity to be seen on the nat'l stage and get face time on TV.

[mass55th]

I think it was Ann Coulter or someone else on Fox News that was talking about Clark. There was friction between him and Clinton over using Black Hawk helicopters in Kosovo. Clark wanted to, Clinton said no. Then she briefly touched on Clark being booted by Clinton and I'm assuming it was over the way Clark wanted to run the program over there. There was also a mention of the bombings. Seems that Clinton issued an order for "no military casualties" and would not allow the planes dropping the bombs to fly low enough to do their job. He was afraid they'd take some artillery. Supposedly, they were flying so high that they could not accurately hit their targets and civilians were being unnecessarily hit. The pilots finally begged to be able to do their job properly saying they'd rather put their lives on the line in the air than take any innocent lives on the ground. I'm wondering if the bombing of the Chinese Embassy couldn't be related to Clinton's order.

[SpinyNorman]

Still, his candidacy has its humorous side and should be allowed to fester for a while.

Why? Think of this: What is John Kerry going to talk about now that his "low profile" participation in the Vietnam war has been trumped? He has to be royally pissed.

Do they give Purple Hearts for a candidacy blowing up in your face? LOL!

[Russell Scott]

Lots of tasty info at the link below.

http://www.zpub.com/un/clark.html

[tioga]

I intend to smile, refer to him as the "little general" and mention his history of lies, Waco/child killing, Bosnia dumb career moves, his promotion/"retirement" as a clintoon lackey and watch the fireworks.... And for sure, let's read up on him. He's a proven loser -- bring it on.

[Redbob]

This is the same Wesley Clark who was so enormously spectacularly wrong about the conduct of the war in Iraq.
And war is allegedly his specialty.

What else is he spectacularly ignorant about?
Everything?

[smiley]

Excellent read...thank you for posting...! I'm going to bookmark this article and show it to my liberal co-workers. Thanks again!

[Truth666]

hEADLINES - not

Disgusting looking oscar winner claiming "9-11 passengers scaredy cats" launchs 2004 president campaign for general that claims to have officially tried to start WWIII

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30367